Is this pro-life argument true?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dobereiner
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Semantics. LOL. When I had an unviable pregnancy/miscarriage, I was given the option to either take the “abortion pill” or perform a DNC (it is really an abortion) or have it pass naturally. Imagine how daunting it was to choose an option. hahaha.
 
But to opt for the medical option or the surgical abortion IS considered abortion in the medical field, it’s the same procedure, same medication. When you book the procedure, it’s essentially the same thing. Imagine how daunting that is for a Catholic - -having to book an “abortion” or be filled a prescription for THE “abortion pill” - - even if you know the pregnancy is not viable and you need it done.

I’m not trying to make a point, actually.
 
I know that and I agree a woman needs to do what is required to ensure are “products of conception” are out of her body in this case.
 
A you a man or woman? Clearly you’ve never experience a miscarriage or know anyone who has.

I personally went for a natural miscarriage - - because the pregnancy is early enough, it was just a really strong, prolonged period (yes, I will be graphic) with huge blood clots coming out of you. It’s painful . However ,for some women they have no choice but to have a dnc because the already dead embryo or fetus (that does not have a heartbeat, mind you) is too large to be passed naturally. There is where you need to make a choice whether to do the surgical abortion or dnc or the abortion pill.

When i say the pregnancy is no longer viable it means a) there is no heartbeat or it has stopped developing before the heartbeat even can start. To call a woman “murderer” because she chooses expel a “non-viable pregnancy” in the means she thinks is most apporopriate for her is disrespectful and at best.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top