Is this valid?

[Hellisreal]

EM
stands for extraordinary minister, not Eucharistic minister!

i dont see where it says not to shorten it to EM only if you shorten it make sure the meaning remains the same

This function is to be understood strictly according to the name by which it is known, that is to say, that of extraordinary minister of Holy Communion

What is the confusion folks?

And can you back up your claim that EM = Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion?

 

[GregoryPalamas]

I see no need for laity distributing the Eucharist. I never go to any of them. I go only to a priest or a deacon and I do not receive in the hand.

CDL

 

[Hellisreal]

I see no need for laity distributing the Eucharist. I never go to any of them. I go only to a priest or a deacon and I do not receive in the hand.

CDL

I wish I was in the Eastern Rite for this and other reasons.

 

[GregoryPalamas]

I wish I was in the Eastern Rite for this and other reasons.

Is there one in your area? Check it out if so.

I don’t receive from laity even if I am in an RC Church. Nor do I receive in the hand in a RC Church.

CDL

 

[bluehen]

I don’t receive from laity even if I am in an RC Church. Nor do I receive in the hand in a RC Church.

CDL

That’s fine, but the church has clearly said that both are okay under the approved circumstances, and so your position doesn’t make you “more correct” or a better Catholic. I’m sorry - a better “Catholic of the Latin Rite in union with Rome”.

 

[Hellisreal]

That’s fine, but the church has clearly said that both are okay under the approved circumstances, and so your position doesn’t make you “more correct” or a better Catholic. I’m sorry - a better “Catholic of the Latin Rite in union with Rome”.

Gregory is NOT of the Latin Rite.

And thanks for your apology BTW.

 

[maryj]

Gregory is NOT of the Latin Rite.

And thanks for your apology BTW.

[SIGN]CHILL[/SIGN]

 

[Marian_Carroll]

The thread is now closed.