B
Bill_Dodds
Guest
And sometimes it can and is: God is love.If I can’t fit it on a bumper sticker, it’s not worth believing.![]()
And sometimes it can and is: God is love.If I can’t fit it on a bumper sticker, it’s not worth believing.![]()
Very true!And sometimes it can and is: God is love.
Well, not to make a pun, but thinking on that, it would seem clear that thinking deeply requires a lot of brain space, just like in the same manner good quality text demands five pages just to deliver a single point.One of the symptoms of our culture that I think Twitter exemplifies perfectly is our growing lack of an ability to think deeply.
Totally with you on this: language is meant to be as fluid as we are, and just because we aren’t talking/writing like people in a Jane Austen novel, doesn’t mean the human race is about to devolve into cave people going “Umfh, umfh, umfh.”Language is always evolving. I don’t like the idea of “the language is getting worse” or “it used to be better”. Centuries from now (if the second coming hasn’t happened by then), people will probably look back and see us as a period of intense grammatical change which made English a more phonetic language. This is probably exactly what English needs to get away from some of its archaic features.
Don’t get me wrong - I love correct grammar. I just don’t think when the grammar changes it should be seen as bad.
My colleague got an email from his high school son’s teacher. She didn’t capitalize anything of use punctuation. He replied back and told her that he feared for his child - that she was a teacher and if she was sloppy in communicating how was she going to teach his child.Texting has destroyed the English language. Twitter is just burying it.
Maybe the Shift key on the computer was stuck? Mine has been known to act up randomly.My colleague got an email from his high school son’s teacher. She didn’t capitalize anything of use punctuation. He replied back and told her that he feared for his child - that she was a teacher and if she was sloppy in communicating how was she going to teach his child.
Not necessarily. Plenty of people just don’t bother. They don’t want the “additional” exertion of using capital letters or punctuation marks. As such, they’ll write in all lowercase or all uppercase and use three dots as dividers, if any.Maybe the Shift key on the computer was stuck? Mine has been known to act up randomly.
Yeah, magnet notes on the fridge.Moderation, I suppose, is the key here.
The invention of shorthand is not without reason. Certainly, it brings us much convenience especially when we’re short of time and have to get a message across quickly.
True, lol. Nice catch. On the other hand, it’s consistent with similar developments in other languages and it could be recognised as a legitimate change. This is different from lousy “texting” grammar and syntax in official writing. I frequently lament what even professional linguists are capable of producing.I had to grin when I read the thread title, which is itself an example of the devolution (okay, change, pace some of the posters) of the language during this generation. I’m Gen-X but can recall being taught that it was not correct grammar to use “how” as a noun. According to the style manuals, it should be worded “Is Twitter ruining the way people write?”![]()
I had the same thought, too when I saw how someone wrote particular words, which makes sense if you think of how those words are starting to be pronounced. (mostly the i and e sounds interchanging - which seems to happen a lot in the English language throughout the centuries) Also, if you read literature from the 16th century, it looks like a blend between Old English and Modern English.Language is always evolving. I don’t like the idea of “the language is getting worse” or “it used to be better”. Centuries from now (if the second coming hasn’t happened by then), people will probably look back and see us as a period of intense grammatical change which made English a more phonetic language. This is probably exactly what English needs to get away from some of its archaic features.
Don’t get me wrong - I love correct grammar. I just don’t think when the grammar changes it should be seen as bad.
Twitter, MySpace, FaceBook etc are all disasters. Gimme old BBS’es or even better newsgroups. The days of alt.barney.dinosaur.die.die.die and other fun groups likeOf course our ability to write is being ruined by Twitter, but it is also being ruined by texting, slang, and Spell Check. Culture is just in a permanent decline and we just have to face up to it.
It’s like how calculators are ruining people’s ability to do basic math…try and do a long multiplication or division in your head…most people can’t…Heck I see people all the time trying to get out the phones to use the “Tip calculator” to figure out the tip…for crying out loud it’s not hard to compute 20% from the total bill!![]()
This was the troll (first relevant part, note the typical trolling style):
I get this feeling that your anti-MS because your an old school
UNIX weenie that hates the fact of MS-NT eating your lunch with
zero administration and fast setup?
This was the first answer:
“Zero Administration?” …Service packs that fix one problem while
introducing another. Distributed in straight binary format with no
source code and no compiler, so you can’t fix bugs in the code
yourself. Changing simple things like IP settings requires a reboot.
Changing damn near anything requires a reboot. On what’s supposed to
be an Enterprise-class server? The people that actually have to
administer NT systems usually hate them. Their boss is the one who
bought MS’s BS about “ease of use” and “reliability”.
This was the second answer (quite interesting, I believe)
I can vouch for this somewhat, having to deal with an NT box at work, although it’s actually given us little trouble. The reason for this is that we have only one mission-critical function running on NT: our proxy server. The only other tasks it’s used for are backing up the network and file/application serving, neither of which would cripple us if the box puked tomorrow. The real important stuff runs on Linux or Solaris (and, as soon as Informix ports its DB tools to Linux, the Sun box will find itself on the doorstep the next day).
What slays me about Microsoft is how badly their software can coexist with other products, including their own. A classic example is their aforementioned proxy Server. When you set up NT with the Option Pack and Service Pack 3, it installs Internet Information Server 4.0 by default. Which is fine, except for one small detail: it breaks proxy Server. We had to back IIS 4.0 out of the system and install IIS 3.0, which has no trouble working with proxy Server. AFAIK, there is still no fix to get proxy Server working properly with IIS 4.0.
Now tell me: if Microsoft can’t be bothered to fix glaring compatibility issues with its own products, what makes anyone think it gives two shits about making them compatible with anyone else’s? Why the hell did Sun sue Microsoft over the Java issue in the first place?
Second part of the troll:
UNIX hit rock bottom 2 years ago when the DOD **** canned it due to
it high cost. NT is cheaper and faster to use. Who in their right
mind would spend $1,500 for a crude UNIX OS when NT is better and
almost $ 1,300 cheaper???
First answer
Well, why would you need to spend $1500 when you can get your pick of
various *BSD and Linux OS’s for either the cost of the CD, or the time
it takes to download? NT Server costs $200? I think it’s a bit more
than that. And you also have to buy client licenses by the seat. The
more workstations you have being served by NT, the greater the cost.
Second answer
He may be thinking of NT Workstation, which is a very different
animal.
Source:Point of comparison: our upgrade to NT (we qualified, having run
Netware previously) cost us just under $1500 for the server and 30
client licenses (also not $200). But Solaris is much, much more
expensive, especially if you run it on SPARC hardware, although
there are no client-access restrictions.