Issue of celibacy causing the great schism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter notredame_999
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Interesting that Humbert didn’t cite divorce and remarriage as one of the ‘evils’ of Constantinople. Catholic apologists today cite that as a huge issue yet it didn’t even appear on Humbert’s radar, despite it being accepted practice in the East.
Very, Very good point!!!
 
How significant was the issue of mandatory clerical celibacy in relation to the great schism between east and west? Was it one of the top 3 reasons? Does the issue hinder a possible re-unification?
No. Rome didn’t actually enforce clerical celibacy in the west until almost a hundred years post Humbert. (It did enforce continence, but that’s a different matter.)
 
There are issues that were considered very important long ago that we no longer have a problem with now. For example, the issue of using azymes (unleavened bread) in the Eucharist.🤷
I just read an interesting post, by Patrick457, the assertion made was that the church at Rome originally used leavened bread. I had always wondered about that but I never read any scholarship on the subject. If the references are correct, there was a distinct Rite of Preparation as well. In the time of Cardinal Humberto he might have been quite unaware of it.

One can read the particulars here
 
I just read an interesting post, by Patrick457, the assertion made was that the church at Rome originally used leavened bread. I had always wondered about that but I never read any scholarship on the subject. If the references are correct, there was a distinct Rite of Preparation as well. In the time of Cardinal Humberto he might have been quite unaware of it.

One can read the particulars here
The Dominican Missal still has a prothesis; it was based upon French use of the Roman Missal ca. 1200.

So we know that the preparation ritual survived past the switch to unleavened bread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top