Issue with divergent spiritualities

  • Thread starter Thread starter WoundedIcon
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
W

WoundedIcon

Guest
I’ve seen that in the Byzantine tradition the use of the imagination during prayer is strongly warned against, and soundly condemned. But in the Latin tradition there are many spiritual practices that encourage the use of the imagination. I find this to be a rather big issue in reuniting Rome and the Orthodox because it shows that they have a very different tradition of prayer, relationship to God, and mysticism. I can see how all doctrinal issues can be resolved… but I honestly don’t know what to do about one side’s praxis practically damning the others…
 
Let me add this: I know in both traditions that mysticism is actually considered the normative path for every Christian, that all progress in righteousness is mystical regardless of whether it’s accompanied by a light show or not. So what I’m saying is… how can we reconcile two different paths that are supposed to be considered normative, and two different paths that effect every believer?
 
Let me add this: I know in both traditions that mysticism is actually considered the normative path for every Christian, that all progress in righteousness is mystical regardless of whether it’s accompanied by a light show or not. So what I’m saying is… how can we reconcile two different paths that are supposed to be considered normative, and two different paths that effect every believer?
Think of it this way: both the 405 Freeway (8 lanes wide) and Sepulveda Boulevard (2 lanes wide) will ultimately reach the ocean. There are advantages and disadvantages to each road: the 405, being a freeway, is faster, but may also be very nerve-wracking. Sepulveda, being a surface street, is slower, but provides more opportunities to look at the beautiful scenery and make “pit stops” if necessary.

Since both roads are approved for travel by the Dept. of Transportation, it’s up to the driver to evaluate the pros and cons of each route, and decide which one to take. Once you do, it’s a good idea to stick with it till you reach your destination. You could switch back and forth, but that might actually make your trip a lot longer.

In the same way, you can choose to travel to God via the mysticism of the East or the mysticism of the West. Both paths have been approved by the Church, so we know neither one is “wrong”. It’s totally a matter of what you, the believer, find preferable. Evaluate the pros and cons of each path, pick one, and stick with it!
 
(there isn’t any implicit rule or law that says all Christian believers have to follow the same practices) -
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top