Jesus' DNA

  • Thread starter Thread starter BioCatholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If all of his DNA came from Mary, Jesus would be a twin/clone of Mary. He must have gotten an X chromosome from somewhere. I don’t see why half of the genetic code could not have been created ex nihilo by God.
This was within Mary’s body, He could have rearranged the DNA of one of her cells and inserted it into an egg
All of his DNA came from Mary. He took his whole human nature from her, that is the teaching of the Church.

But that doesn’t mean he would be a clone. God could rearrange the DNA, even create a **Y **chromosome by rearranging base pairs.

Half of the DNA was probably ALREADY in an egg. The other half he could have taken from any cell and rearranged the base pairs how he needed.

This issue is really not a difficulty for the faith.
 
40.png
batteddy:
All of his DNA came from Mary. He took his whole human nature from her, that is the teaching of the Church.

But that doesn’t mean he would be a clone. God could rearrange the DNA, even create a **Y **chromosome by rearranging base pairs.

Half of the DNA was probably ALREADY in an egg. The other half he could have taken from any cell and rearranged the base pairs how he needed.

This issue is really not a difficulty for the faith.
Oops. I meant Y chromosome. Thanks for catching that. Right, Jesus received his whole humanity from Mary, so I guess the little bits must have been rearranged.

It all comes down to spelling out the implications of “The Word became Flesh.” Fully human: human mind, will, body, bones, flesh, cells, DNA, molecules, etc. It’s all good.

These scientific psuedo-problems do distract, though, from the truly wonderous fact that God chose to become a man.
 
Gosh - maybe that’s why He walked the earth 2,000 years ago. Today the government would be keeping Him is some lab to experiment on.

Perhaps embyonic stem cell research?
 
40.png
joshua1:
This is why we call it the Mystery of the Incarnation.
Pope Innocent III’s letter “Eius exemplo” Dec. 18, 1208, “Incarnationem divinitatis non in Patre neque in Spiritu Sancto factam, sed in Filio tantum, corde credimus et ore confitemur; ut qui erat in divinitate Dei Patris Filius, Deus verus ex Patre, esset in humanitate hominis filius, homo verus ex matre, veram carnem habens ex visceribus matris et animam humanam rationabilem, simul utriusque naturae, id est Deus et homo, una persona, unus Filius, unus Christus, unus Deus cum Patre et Spiritu Sancto, omnium auctor et rector, natus ex virgine Maria vera carnis nativitate…”

“homo verus ex matre, veram carnem habens ex visceribus matris” could be translated: “true man from the mother, having true flesh from the viscera of the mother”.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top