S
steveb1
Guest
What is the significance of Jesus’ sacrificial atonement being symbolized in Paschal Lamb imagery? In normative Judaism, the lamb was simply an element of the Seder, along with the matzo, the bitter herbs, etc.
Traditionally, the lamb’s only function beyond nourishment was to have its blood smeared on Hebrew doorposts, in order for YHVH’s avenging angel to see it and “pass over” houses so marked. But the Passover lamb, as far as I know, never symbolized the redemption of Israel, and was never thought to be a sin-expiation or a religious sacrifice - so its application to Jesus strikes one as rather odd.
If memory serves, the “atoning animal sacrifices” made in the Temple by the Jewish priests were never Passover lambs, but rather other animals like bulls or goats. The Paschal lamb was butchered in the home, then privately served with Seder dinner. So the two animals - one, the lamb; the other, the priestly altar animals, seem to serve two entirely different functions. The lamb is for a private commemoration of the Exodus from Egypt; the bull is for a public altar sacrifice.
Therefore, why and how did Jesus’ bloody sacrifice on the cross come to be associated with a purely private, NON-SACRIFICIAL consumption of a lamb? One would expect that if Jesus’ atonement was going to be associated with an animal, that animal would have been a truly sacrificial animal, such as the bulls that were indeed used in Temple atonement sacrifice.
Traditionally, the lamb’s only function beyond nourishment was to have its blood smeared on Hebrew doorposts, in order for YHVH’s avenging angel to see it and “pass over” houses so marked. But the Passover lamb, as far as I know, never symbolized the redemption of Israel, and was never thought to be a sin-expiation or a religious sacrifice - so its application to Jesus strikes one as rather odd.
If memory serves, the “atoning animal sacrifices” made in the Temple by the Jewish priests were never Passover lambs, but rather other animals like bulls or goats. The Paschal lamb was butchered in the home, then privately served with Seder dinner. So the two animals - one, the lamb; the other, the priestly altar animals, seem to serve two entirely different functions. The lamb is for a private commemoration of the Exodus from Egypt; the bull is for a public altar sacrifice.
Therefore, why and how did Jesus’ bloody sacrifice on the cross come to be associated with a purely private, NON-SACRIFICIAL consumption of a lamb? One would expect that if Jesus’ atonement was going to be associated with an animal, that animal would have been a truly sacrificial animal, such as the bulls that were indeed used in Temple atonement sacrifice.