Jesus reinstating Peter as bishop of Rome?

[billcu1]

No, but the Psalms are much improved. The 1970 NAB did not use inclusive language. In 1986, the NT was re-translated to make it more of a formal translation (as compared to the 1970 NT), but they added the inclusive language (though not to the degree that the NRSV did). In the US mass, we still use the 1970 OT and Psalms and the 1986 NT with some revisions added (like: ‘Hail, full of grace’, etc.).

What’s “inclusive language”? Ok so it’s the NAB the lectionary is based. I might just start going with the DR then. But I use the daily liturgy of the word from www.usccb.org to do lectio divina.

 

[JamesTheJust]

What’s “inclusive language”? Ok so it’s the NAB the lectionary is based. I might just start going with the DR then. But I use the daily liturgy of the word from www.usccb.org to do lectio divina.

Inclusive language is changing “brothers” to “brothers and sisters”, or something like that. This is prevalent in many modern translations. The Church’s policy is that horizontal (talking about humans) inclusive language is OK, but vertical (talking about God or the angels/demons) is NOT.

Your Bible reading plan sounds great to me! Though, I have found that reading from paper is better for doing lectio than reading from a screen is. I might suggest that you just look up the verses, then read them from your actual Bible.