Jesus taken up to heaven

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catholicwoman11
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Catholicwoman11

Guest
I know that Jesus ascended of his own power according to Catholic teaching. I am in agreement with this. However, I have trouble explaining this to a Protestant when the passage says in the New American Bible “So then the Lord Jesus, after he spoke to them, was taken up into heaven and took his seat at the right hand of God”. The Protestant is taking issue with the word “taken” and does not think he did it of his own power, but that Father took him up. The Protestant is having some issues with the co-equalness of the Trinity (which is kind of a different issues, but if anyone has some bible passages for that too, that would be helpful)

Thanks
 
I know that Jesus ascended of his own power according to Catholic teaching. I am in agreement with this. However, I have trouble explaining this to a Protestant when the passage says in the New American Bible “So then the Lord Jesus, after he spoke to them, was taken up into heaven and took his seat at the right hand of God”. The Protestant is taking issue with the word “taken” and does not think he did it of his own power, but that Father took him up. The Protestant is having some issues with the co-equalness of the Trinity (which is kind of a different issues, but if anyone has some bible passages for that too, that would be helpful)

Thanks
Not an answer to the question per se, but I’ll also add that there are also passages in Scripture where Jesus is not said to ‘rise’, but ‘raised’ from the dead, something which is unfortunately obscured in a few translations which turn the passive into an active in some instances. Here are three such passages (I’ll give more later):

“This Jesus God raised up, and of that we all are witnesses.”

Acts 2:32

If the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, he who raised Christ Jesus from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through his Spirit who dwells in you.
  • Romans 8:11
For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised oon the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the Twelve. …] Now if Christ is proclaimed as raised from the dead, how can some of you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised. And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain. We are even found to be misrepresenting God, because we testified about God that he raised Christ, whom he did not raise if it is true that the dead are not raised. For if the dead are not raised, not even Christ has been raised. And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins.
…] But in fact Christ has been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep. For as by a man came death, by a man has come also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive.

1 Corinthians 15
 
Jesus is equal in dignity and might to God the Father; however out of perfect humility, God the Son wholly summits to the Father, obeying the Father even unto death.

Therefore, its perfectly fitting that God the Father glorify His obedient Son by raising Him to Heaven.
 
Jesus is equal in dignity and might to God the Father; however out of perfect humility, God the Son wholly summits to the Father, obeying the Father even unto death.

Therefore, its perfectly fitting that God the Father glorify His obedient Son by raising Him to Heaven.
With this in mind would it thus be correct to say that both the Resurrection and Ascension are acts that involve both the Father and the Son (or better yet, the whole Trinity)? On one hand, we can say that Jesus rose and ascended of His own divine power, and on the other hand, the Father raised His Son from the dead and exalted Him.
 
Does this have to be either or, or can it be both and more?

John 20:17 Jesus saith to her: Do not touch me, for I am not yet ascended to my Father. But go to my brethren, and say to them: I ascend to my Father and to your Father, to my God and your God.

Ephesians 4:10
He that descended is the same also that ascended above all the heavens, that he might fill all things.

Douay-Rheims Catholic Bible
 
Jesus makes it clear that everything he does he does so according to the will of his Father. All of his actions, words and thoughts are given to him by the Father. He lives in perfect submission to the Father doing nothing except that which the Father has given him to do.

So it seems clear that the Son exercises his will to be in total submission to the Father. So when Isaiah says it pleased the Father to crush him and the the Son tells Pilate “I lay my life down no one takes it from me” there is no conflict of wills. The Father loved the world so he sent his Son. The Son loves the world so He came. The Spirit loves the world so he fills the Church and makes her holy.

So when the Bible says he was taken up it could just have easily had said “he went up” and it would have been saying the same thing. The Father wills the Son wills the Spirit wills and there is no dispute among the Godhead at all.

God Bless
 
With this in mind would it thus be correct to say that both the Resurrection and Ascension are acts that involve both the Father and the Son (or better yet, the whole Trinity)? On one hand, we can say that Jesus rose and ascended of His own divine power, and on the other hand, the Father raised His Son from the dead and exalted Him.
I think would be correct. Bogeydogg says it well - all persons in the Trinity are united in their divine will - saying one rose the other is the same as the other raising himself.
…He lives in perfect submission to the Father doing nothing except that which the Father has given him to do…

God Bless
👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top