Jewish Temple #3 --- prophesied in Scripture, now only a few years away!

  • Thread starter Thread starter brb3
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Rev. 13:1-3 Describes the BEAST from the SEA with 7 heads. Has a blasphemous name. And he gives his power and kingship to the dragon [satan]. And a mortal wound occurs to only ONE of the heads, but the beast recovers by miraculous means. Secular men worship the beast, and the beast persecutes the saints [Church].
One minor correction. The sea beast “gets” it power and throne “from” the dragon. The beast is Rome and the one head is Nero who commited suicide.
Rev. 13:11-15 Now a 2nd BEAST from the EARTH arises with similar authority to the 1st Beast. And makes the people worship beast #1, and convinces them to make an idol of Beast #1. This idol / statue will be animated, breathing and speaking … and all will have to take the ‘mark’ of the beast… 666. But, the idol is not human ! Its something material … like a robot, perhaps.
Earth beast was the priestly and juridical body (of Israel) that rejected the kingship of Christ and pledged their allegiance to Caesar (Jn 19:15)

The idol is not literal. It is and allusion to (Dan 3:1-7).
Rev. 14:8-12 The 1st Beast & its Idol rule … but, God’s wrath is poured out upon his secular followers.
Rev. 15:5 temple of the tent of witnesses seen in heaven
Rev. 16:1 Loud voice from the temple … telling the angels to take plagues down to earth.
[the Temple is in heaven at this time. Seems the rapture of saints has already occurred]
The heavenly Temple has always existed. THe eartly one is a copy.
Chp. 17 … the harlot [of Babylon] joins the Beast — later the Beast turns on the Great City and burns it to the ground.
3 1/2 year Jewish-Roman war.
Chp. 18 the people of Babylon mourn loss of the city. Verse 24 “And in her was found the blood of the prophets and of the saints” … so this appears to be Jerusalem, not Rome. :hmmm:
Exactly! The Apocalypse is the end of the Old Covenant Age. This prefigures the end of time itself, when Christ returns. The first is a localized judgment the second will be universal. The ECF’s said something similair would happen to Rome inbetween time.
Chp. 19:11-21 Christ and the saints [in heaven] return to earth to defeat the Beasts 1 & 2.
This is not literal, just like the LORD did not literally come to Egypt in (Isa 19:1). He sent the Assyrians in (Isa 20:1)

The Lords judgment is destroying two dynasties rule. Julius Caesar’s line and the Old Covenant priesthood and Laws scheduled to pass away.
Chp. 20 White Throne Judgment of ALL.
The Church age or New Testament age (millenium) happens before Christ returns.
Chp. 21 New Heaven & New Earth … with HOLY, New Jerusalem … coming down to exist on the NEW EARTH. But, it has NO Temple. The Sunshine comes from the Father, and the Moonlight from Christ.
The Trinity is the sanctuary of the heavenly city. The Old Jerusalem was built around the Temple, and the New Jerusalem stand within the temple of the Lord. There is no partitions or veils to prevent access.
 
Good points ! Perhaps the Protestant viewpoint of the EndTime is too influenced by OT ‘Jewish’ ideas. They take Rev. too literally.

The Key BREAKOUT juncture … is when God says “behold the DAYS ARE COMING declares the Lord, when I will establish A NEW COVENANT WITH ISRAEL,” … not like the OT one with Abraham.

When did/will this BREAKOUT occur ? Was it the Cross, was it Pentecost & Catholic Church inception, will it be the Rapture, will it be Christ’s return to redeem Israel … fighting on their behalf at Armaggedon ?

Somewhere in prophesy should be the definitive answer !!!
Prophecy is fulfilled with the Lord’s birth and everything that follows.

Then he took the bread, said the blessing, broke it, and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body, which will be given for you; do this in memory of me.” And likewise the cup after they had eaten, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which will be shed for you. (Luke 22:19-20)
 
The Key BREAKOUT juncture … is when God says “behold the DAYS ARE COMING declares the Lord, when I will establish A NEW COVENANT WITH ISRAEL,” … not like the OT one with Abraham.

When did/will this BREAKOUT occur ? Was it the Cross, was it Pentecost & Catholic Church inception, will it be the Rapture, will it be Christ’s return to redeem Israel … fighting on their behalf at Armaggedon ?

Somewhere in prophesy should be the definitive answer !!!
As ryanoneil pointed out, the Lord said at the Last Supper:

And having taken the cup, and having given thanks, He gave it to them, saying, “Drink from it, all of you, for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the remission of sins; and I tell you, that I will not drink henceforth on this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it with you new in the kingdom of my Father.

-Matthew 26:28-29

And having taken the cup, having given thanks, He gave to them, and all they drank from it; and He said to them, “This is my blood of the covenant that is poured out for many. Amen, I say to you, that no more will I drink of the fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new in the kingdom of God.

-Mark 14:23-25

And in the same way the cup after the supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood, that for you is being poured out.

-Luke 22:20

In the same way also the cup after the supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” For as often as you eat this bread and this cup drink, you proclaim the death of the Lord until He comes.

-1 Corinthians 11:25-26

It all hearkens back to:

And Moses wrote all the words of YHWH, and rose early in the morning, and built an altar at the foot of the mountain, and twelve standing-stones for the twelve tribes of Israel; and he sent the young men of the sons of Israel, and they caused burnt-offerings to go up, and sacrificed sacrifices of peace-offerings to YHWH - young bulls. And Moses took half of the blood, and out it in bowls, and half of the blood he threw against the altar. And he took the book of the covenant, and read it the ears of the people, and they said, “All that YHWH has spoken we will do, and we will be obedient!” And Moses took the blood, and threw it out on the people, and said, “Behold the blood of the covenant that YHWH has made with you according to all these words.

-Exodus 24:4-8

Once again, I might warn you about the idea of the Rapture as presented in premillenialism.
 
Prophecy is fulfilled with the Lord’s birth and everything that follows.

Then he took the bread, said the blessing, broke it, and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body, which will be given for you; do this in memory of me.” And likewise the cup after they had eaten, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which will be shed for you. (Luke 22:19-20)
So … the Eucharist is the Epiphany Key that unlocks the mystery !

Not symbolic, but the ESSENSE of the New Covenant … believers sealed/infused by Christ’s Body/Blood. The perpetual, living sacrafice that is forever ongoing — from the rising to the setting of the Sun.

Yes, I see the Church clearly described by John in his End Time prophesy. But, there may yet be a double meaning … that applies to the Jews as well. There are some verses in John and the OT prophets that don’t seem to have been fulfilled yet … and refer to the Jews.
 
Also, we know Judas received the Eucharist. But, because he lacked faith, not receiving in correct spirit as taught by Christ … it did him no good, it lacked salvific grace.

Later, Paul in his Epistle addresses this matter for us … regarding correct receipt of the Eucharist.
 
So … the Eucharist is the Epiphany Key that unlocks the mystery !

Not symbolic, but the ESSENSE of the New Covenant … believers sealed/infused by Christ’s Body/Blood. The perpetual, living sacrafice that is forever ongoing — from the rising to the setting of the Sun.

Yes, I see the Church clearly described by John in his End Time prophesy. But, there may yet be a double meaning … that applies to the Jews as well. There are some verses in John and the OT prophets that don’t seem to have been fulfilled yet … and refer to the Jews.
Like…?
 
Once again, I might warn you about
the idea of the
Taken from the above article is the following :

Rev. 20:4 - this verse shows the millennium is the period of Christ’s current reign with his saints in heaven and his rule through the Church. This view, which Protestants call “amillennialism,” is consistent with the Cathlic view. The RAPTURE AND THE SECOND COMING WILL OCCUR AFTER CHRIST’S REIGN AND THE END OF THE CHURCH MILITANT ON EARTH.

I’m not clear on the last sentence above: 1). Rapture & Second Coming … they are not two separate events ! 2). What do Catholic mean by ‘Christ’s reign’ … as taught in 20:4 ? [Current heavenly millennial OR future earthly millennial] ?
 
I’m not clear on the last sentence above: 1). Rapture & Second Coming … they are not two separate events ! 2). What do Catholic mean by ‘Christ’s reign’ … as taught in 20:4 ? [Current heavenly millennial OR future earthly millennial] ?
Yep, in Dispensational Premillennialism the Rapture is usually presented as happening BEFORE the Second Coming. However, because amillennialism is the opinion which has took hold within Catholic circles, the idea is that the “thousand years” in which Christ will rule is interpreted to be a symbolic (not literal) thousand years: the “thousand years” is the Age of the Church, when Christ will rule, seated at God’s right hand, through His Church, and Satan is bound in such a manner that he cannot stop the spreading of the Gospel all over the world (this does not stop him from tempting individuals, however).

In the image below, this is number 4:



In this idea, a ‘rapture’ of sorts will happen AFTER, not BEFORE or DURING, the tribulation - which all the faithful (the Church) here on earth living at that time will experience. Nobody would be spared this time of trials. IMO this is what the Catechism was referring to when it said:

675 Before Christ’s second coming the Church must pass through a final trial that will shake the faith of many believers. The persecution that accompanies her pilgrimage on earth will unveil the “mystery of iniquity” in the form of a religious deception offering men an apparent solution to their problems at the price of apostasy from the truth. The supreme religious deception is that of the Antichrist, a pseudo-messianism by which man glorifies himself in place of God and of his Messiah come in the flesh.

676 The Antichrist’s deception already begins to take shape in the world every time the claim is made to realize within history that messianic hope which can only be realized beyond history through the eschatological judgment. The Church has rejected even modified forms of this falsification of the kingdom to come under the name of millenarianism, especially the “intrinsically perverse” political form of a secular messianism.

677 The Church will enter the glory of the kingdom only through this final Passover, when she will follow her Lord in his death and Resurrection. The kingdom will be fulfilled, then, not by a historic triumph of the Church through a progressive ascendancy, but only by God’s victory over the final unleashing of evil, which will cause his Bride to come down from heaven. God’s triumph over the revolt of evil will take the form of the Last Judgment after the final cosmic upheaval of this passing world.

That webpage I linked to says as much:

Catholics certainly believe that “we will be caught up in the air” (1 Thess 4:17) when the trumpet sounds. So Catholics do believe in the “Rapture” if one is talking about the third option - Post Tribulation Rapture (although they understand the 1000 years to mean “a long time” Rev. 20:2-3; 7). The term “rapture” is derived from the text of the Catholic Latin Vulgate that was written in 390 A.D. It comes from 1 Thess. 4:17-“we will be caught up,” [Latin: *rapiemur]).

Catholics find no solid scriptural evidence that Jesus will come two or three more times. We think Scripture is clear that He will only come one more time. Catholics do not see any Biblical evidence as to why Christians should be “spared” the tribulation of the evil one. The Catholic Church feels that all Biblical evidence points to the contrary - that Christians will undergo great persecutions and tribulation. Catholics believe that history bears witness that the Church thrives under persecution.

Perhaps we will win many converts to Christianity during the tribulation. Most humans (including me) are more disposed to a conversion of heart when things are bad. Nothing creates an open mind and opens someone to a personal relationship with Christ more than suffering. During the tribulation people will be looking for answers. They will be “ripe” for conversion. This is the only value of the tribulation.The Bible says:

How, then, can they call on the one they have not believed in? And how can they believe in the one of whom they have not heard? And how can they hear without someone preaching to them? And how can they preach unless they are sent? As it is written, “How beautiful are the feet of those who bring good news!” (Rm 10:14-15)

If all the “good Christians” are taken out of the world during the tribulation, who will be left on earth to convert the poor souls who are looking for answers during that time? Would Jesus leave humans on earth for the devil to ravage but remove all the Christians who can convert them? This would prevent the spreading of the Gospel during that time. If he did that he would be condemning these non-Christians before the Judgment day. (Mat 11:22)​

And because the ‘thousand years’ would have been over by then according to the amillennialist opinion, the ‘rapture’ precedes (probably acting as a prelude to) the Last Judgment - everyone, not just the good faithful, would be taken up to meet the Judge of the living and the dead.
 
Jeremiah 33:14-26 Is this only about the Catholic Popes/Priests & Christ the Branch ? No double meaning for the Jews also ?

Zechariah 13:1-3 If we see this as Christ [and how can we not ?] … then, what do we do with verses 2/3 ? Would that not disallow John’s vision of prophesy ? … unless we say it wasn’t prophesy, but only an allegory of ‘past tense’ fulfilled matters.
 
Yep, in Dispensational Premillennialism the Rapture is usually presented as happening BEFORE the Second Coming. However, because amillennialism is the opinion which has took hold within Catholic circles, the idea is that the “thousand years” in which Christ will rule is interpreted to be a symbolic (not literal) thousand years: the “thousand years” is the Age of the Church, when Christ will rule, seated at God’s right hand, through His Church, and Satan is bound in such a manner that he cannot stop the spreading of the Gospel all over the world (this does not stop him from tempting individuals, however). In the image below, this is number 4:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...nial_views.svg/420px-Millennial_views.svg.png
So the Catholic Church believes in a SYMBOLIC 1000 yr, yet a LITERAL [heavenly & earthly] reign, followed by the Rapture & Great White Throne Judgment ?
 
So the Catholic Church believes in a SYMBOLIC 1000 yr, yet a LITERAL [heavenly & earthly] reign, followed by the Rapture & Great White Throne Judgment ?
Well, AFAIK it is not a “belief” in the sense of undisputed dogma, but we generally follow St. Augustine on this point on espousing amilllenialism. Somebody correct me if I am wrong, but in a sense, yes, we do believe in a symbolic time period yet a literal reign of Christ through His Church. The idea of a pre-tribulational Rapture is actually a new one: it is first attested only in the 1800’s.

In the early Church, there were two main opinions running side-by-side: amillennialism and premillennialism. However, the premillenialism that was held at that time is different from the dispensational premillennialism that is dominant today. Many of the church fathers who held this historical premillenialism believed in a sexta-septamillennial tradition which posits that the world is destined to last for just 6,000 years and then experience a thousand years of rest (the millennial kingdom) before the end, paralleling the seven days of Genesis. All in all, there is to be a 7,000 year period, and after that, the new creation.

Many of those who opposed this premillennialism (such as Origen and St. Augustine, who once held the opinion himself) usually did so on the grounds that positing a literal thousand-year reign is too ‘carnal’. For example, St. Augustine once wrote (City of God 20.7):

The evangelist John has spoken of these two resurrections in the book which is called the Apocalypse, but in such a way that some Christians do not understand the first of the two, and so construe the passage into ridiculous fancies. For the Apostle John says in the foresaid book, “And I saw an angel come down from heaven…Blessed and holy is he that has part in the first resurrection: on such the second death has no power; but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with Him a thousand years.

Those who, on the strength of this passage, have suspected that the first resurrection is future and bodily, have been moved, among other things, specially by the number of a thousand years, as if it were a fit thing that the saints should thus enjoy a kind of Sabbath-rest during that period, a holy leisure after the labors of the six thousand years since man was created, and was on account of his great sin dismissed from the blessedness of paradise into the woes of this mortal life, so that thus, as it is written, “One day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day,” (2 Peter 3:8) there should follow on the completion of six thousand years, as of six days, a kind of seventh-day Sabbath in the succeeding thousand years; and that it is for this purpose the saints rise, viz., to celebrate this Sabbath.

And this opinion would not be objectionable, if it were believed that the joys of the saints in that Sabbath shall be spiritual, and consequent on the presence of God; for I myself, too, once held this opinion. But, as they assert that those who then rise again shall enjoy the leisure of immoderate carnal banquets, furnished with an amount of meat and drink such as not only to shock the feeling of the temperate, but even to surpass the measure of credulity itself, such assertions can be believed only by the carnal. They who do believe them are called by the spiritual Chiliasts, which we may literally reproduce by the name Millenarians. It were a tedious process to refute these opinions point by point: we prefer proceeding to show how that passage of Scripture should be understood.

St. Augustine’s opinion proved to be popular enough that it became the majority opinion in all of Christendom for many centuries to come (most Reformers themselves were amillennialists), that is before the resurgence of Premillennialism and the advent of Dispensationalism in the 19th century.
 
Just another quote from St. Augustine (The City of God 20.9):

But while the devil is bound, the saints reign with Christ during the same thousand years, understood in the same way, that is, of the time of His first coming. For, leaving out of account that kingdom concerning which He shall say in the end, “Come, you blessed of my Father, take possession of the kingdom prepared for you,” (Matthew 25:34) the Church could not now be called His kingdom or the kingdom of heaven unless His saints were even now reigning with Him, though in another and far different way; for to His saints He says, “Lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world.” (Matthew 28:20)

Certainly it is in this present time that the scribe well instructed in the kingdom of God, and of whom we have already spoken, brings forth from his treasure things new and old. And from the Church those reapers shall gather out the tares which He suffered to grow with the wheat till the harvest, as He explains in the words: “The harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels. As therefore the tares are gathered together and burned with fire, so shall it be in the end of the world. The Son of man shall send His angels, and they shall gather out of His kingdom all offenses.” (Matthew 13:39-41) Can He mean out of that kingdom in which are no offenses? Then it must be out of His present kingdom, the Church, that they are gathered.

So He says, “He that breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven: but he that does and teaches thus shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:19) He speaks of both as being in the kingdom of heaven, both the man who does not perform the commandments which He teaches—for to break means not to keep, not to perform—and the man who does and teaches as He did; but the one He calls least, the other great. And He immediately adds, “For I say unto you, that unless your righteousness exceed that of the scribes and Pharisees,”— that is, the righteousness of those who break what they teach; for of the scribes and Pharisees He elsewhere says, “For they say and do not;” (Matthew 23:3) — unless therefore, your righteousness exceed theirs that is, so that you do not break but rather do what you teach, “you shall not enter the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:20)

We must understand in one sense the kingdom of heaven in which exist together both he who breaks what he teaches and he who does it, the one being least, the other great, and in another sense the kingdom of heaven into which only he who does what he teaches shall enter. Consequently, where both classes exist, it is the Church as it now is, but where only the one shall exist, it is the Church as it is destined to be when no wicked person shall be in her. Therefore the Church even now is the kingdom of Christ, and the kingdom of heaven. Accordingly, even now His saints reign with Him, though otherwise than as they shall reign hereafter; and yet, though the tares grow in the Church along with the wheat, they do not reign with Him. For they reign with Him who do what the apostle says, “If you be risen with Christ, mind the things which are above, where Christ sits at the right hand of God. Seek those things which are above, not the things which are on the earth.” (Colossians 3:1-2) Of such persons he also says that their conversation is in heaven. (Philippians 3:20) In fine, they reign with Him who are so in His kingdom that they themselves are His kingdom. But in what sense are those the kingdom of Christ who, to say no more, though they are in it until all offenses are gathered out of it at the end of the world, yet seek their own things in it, and not the things that are Christ’s? (Philippians 2:21)

It is then of this kingdom militant, in which conflict with the enemy is still maintained, and war carried on with warring lusts, or government laid upon them as they yield, until we come to that most peaceful kingdom in which we shall reign without an enemy, and it is of this first resurrection in the present life, that the Apocalypse speaks in the words just quoted.
 
Jeremiah 33:14-26 Is this only about the Catholic Popes/Priests & Christ the Branch ? No double meaning for the Jews also ?

Zechariah 13:1-3 If we see this as Christ [and how can we not ?] … then, what do we do with verses 2/3 ? Would that not disallow John’s vision of prophesy ? … unless we say it wasn’t prophesy, but only an allegory of ‘past tense’ fulfilled matters.
Technically this notion rests on the Dispensationalist idea that the nation of Israel is distinct from the Church (though they recognize an overlap between the two), and that God will fulfill His promises to national Israel. These promises include the land promises, which in the future result in a millennial kingdom where Christ, upon His return, will rule the world from Jerusalem for a thousand years.

The Church age is, in the classic Dispensationalist way of putting it, one of the parentheses, the ‘dispensations’, in God’s plan of the ages, which concerns the Jewish people. At the beginning of the Church age, dispensationalists hold, God turned aside from dealing with the Jewish people in order that a (primarily) gentile Church might be built up. After the Church is taken out of the picture by the Rapture, God will turn back to dealing with the Jewish people.

The Church meanwhile officially holds that the Mosaic covenant was fulfilled by the New Covenant in Christ. The practical purpose of the nation of Israel in God’s plans is now replaced by the role of the Church. There is an integral continuity between the Old and New Covenants rather than a rupture.

Nevertheless, the Church does not follow punitive supersessionism (what is usually called “replacement theology”) in that it does not see the Jewish people as being condemned and forsaken by God because of their rejection of Jesus and thus are effectively and completely irrelevant in terms of eschatology and Biblical prophecy. The New Israel, the Church, may now be entrusted with the fulfilment of the promises of the Old Israel, but this does not obliterate the identity of the Old Israel, nor deprive it from playing any role in God’s plan of the ages. Hence the common saying that one of the signs that signal the parousia is the acceptance by the Jews as a whole - though not necessarily every Jewish individual - that Jesus is the Messiah.

Following St. Augustine, the Church teaches that the Jewish people are an important reminder that the “gifts and calling of God are irrevocable” (Romans 11:29). The persevering presence of Israel on earth is perhaps that best proof that God exists and that His covenant extends “to a thousand generations” (Deuteronomy 7:9). The Church recognizes an ongoing and unique relationship between the Jewish people, God and the Church. Note however that we do not hold a dual-covenant theology, which teaches that Jews may simply keep the Law of Moses while the Gentiles must become Christians to enter under the covenant. For example, in paragraph 9 of Lumen Gentium (1964), it says that God “chose the race of Israel as a people” and “set up a covenant” with them, instructing them and making them holy. However:

All these things, however, were done by way of preparation and as a figure of that new and perfect covenant, which was to be ratified in Christ, and of that fuller revelation which was to be given through the Word of God Himself made flesh. “Behold the days shall come saith the Lord, and I will make a new covenant with the House of Israel, and with the house of Judah…I will give my law in their bowels, and I will write it in their heart, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people…For all of them shall know Me, from the least of them even to the greatest, saith the Lord.” (Jer. 31, 31-34) Christ instituted this new covenant, the new testament, that is to say, in His Blood (Cf. 1 Cor. 11, 25), calling together a people made up of Jew and gentile, making them one, not according to the flesh but in the Spirit. This was to be the new People of God. For those who believe in Christ, who are reborn not from a perishable but from an imperishable seed through the word of the living God, (Cf. 1 Pet. 1, 23) not from the flesh but from water and the Holy Spirit (Cf. Jn. 3, 5-6), are finally established as “a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a purchased people …who in times past were not a people, but are now the people of God.” (1 Pet. 2, 9-10)

And in paragraph 7 of In Notes on the Correct Way to Present the Jews and Judaism (1985):

In virtue of her divine mission, the Church” which is to be “the all-embracing means of salvation" in which alone "the fulness of the means of salvation can be obtained” (Unit. Red. 3); “must of her nature proclaim Jesus Christ to the world” (cf. Guidelines and Suggestions, I). Indeed we believe that is is through him that we go to the Father (cf. Jn. 14:6) “and this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent” (Jn 17:33).

Jesus affirms (ibid. 10:16) that “there shall be one flock and one shepherd”. Church and Judaism cannot then be seen as two parallel ways of salvation and the Church must witness to Christ as the Redeemer for all, “while maintaining the strictest respect for religious liberty in line with the teaching of the Second Vatican Council (Declaration Dignitatis Humanae)” (Guidelines and Suggestions, I).
 
So … the Eucharist is the Epiphany Key that unlocks the mystery !

Not symbolic, but the ESSENSE of the New Covenant … believers sealed/infused by Christ’s Body/Blood. The perpetual, living sacrafice that is forever ongoing — from the rising to the setting of the Sun.

Yes, I see the Church clearly described by John in his End Time prophesy. But, there may yet be a double meaning … that applies to the Jews as well. There are some verses in John and the OT prophets that don’t seem to have been fulfilled yet … and refer to the Jews.
Jesus does specifically mention the New Covenant there, but it is more than that. Jeremiah says “It will not be like the covenant I made with their fathers the day I took them by the hand to lead them forth from the land of Egypt.” Think of exodus and apply it to Jesus. Think of Israel and apply it to Jesus. He is baptized (beloved son) and driven out into the desert. Jesus is the New Moses and representative of the New Israel (beloved son). Like Moses, Jesus ends His 40 day fast by climbing a “mount” to give the people the law of God (Sermon on the Mount), to fulfill the Law (of Moses) and the prophets.

Then at the transfiguration he is seen with the Law and prophets (Moses and Elijah) talking about the exodus that He was going to accomplish in Jerusalem. Here we see the connection with Jeremiah- as the first exodus led to the making of a covenant between God and Israel at Sinai, this new exodus would result in a new covenant. It was his Passion, death and Resurrection that the prophets foresaw. As the first exodus liberated Israel, the new exodus will liberate every race and people. As the first exodus freed Israel from bondage to Pharaoh, the new exodus will free all mankind from slavery to sin and death.

And of course, Jesus makes a direct quotation of Moses’ words at Sinai at the Last Supper.

Then he took the blood and sprinkled it on the people, saying, “This is the blood of the covenant which the LORD has made with you in accordance with all these words of his.” (Ex 24:8)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top