J
Jim_Baur
Guest
I heard on a LCMS radio that the pharisees would not keep fish or sheep.
Is that correct?
Thanks!
Is that correct?
Thanks!
I dunno…Seems to be a pretty big disconnect between your title question and your post question…Pharisees are a subset of Jews - so saying Pharisees would not keep fish or sheep is different from saying “Jews were not shepherds”…I heard on a LCMS radio that the pharisees would not keep fish or sheep.
Is that correct?
Thanks!
Many of the key figures chosen by God in the OT were shepherds.Note that David was a shepherd.
I read, and I cannot recall where, that Pharisees tended to also be scribes, professional writers. Jews as a whole were literate in that they could read, but writing was a special skill. I also believe there were “capital S” Scribes in the Temple, and common scribes in towns and villages. I think the Scribes were like lawyers.Beyond that I tend to agree with Jerry. The Pharisees were likely more “merchant” types and even if they did buy and sell sheep or fish…they most likely did not handle the actual labor themselves…
but I could be way off on that…
Peace
James
Jacob (Israel) and his entire family were shepherds. Joseph told his brothers to tell Pharaoh that they tended sheep when he brought them to introduce them to Pharaoh (See Genesis 47) I believe in the Roman Empire of Jesus’ day most people were illiterate and those who could read were given the special title “Lego” meaning “I can read.”I read, and I cannot recall where, that Pharisees tended to also be scribes, professional writers. Jews as a whole were literate in that they could read, but writing was a special skill. I also believe there were “capital S” Scribes in the Temple, and common scribes in towns and villages. I think the Scribes were like lawyers.
hmmmm - I need to look this up…
Nah, it’s the Sadducees who were primarily aristocratic. The Pharisees were more of a populist group composed of men from different social classes, ranging from semi-educated tradesmen and merchants to literate scribes, teachers, and legal professionals. There were rich men who were Pharisees, yes, but I should note that two of the most famous sages, Hillel and Shammai, were actually working-class poor: one was a woodcutter (one of the lowliest professions in antiquity, note) and the other did construction work. In other words, they don’t have much difference from Jesus Himself, who was a craftsman (tekton) who would have dabbled in wood-working and housebuilding and a few other odd jobs on the side. If we believe St. Paul was a Pharisee, there’s another one who supported himself by manual labor (tentmaking).I would think that the Jewish society was composed of a mixture of trades:
Agricultors, herders, fishermen, carpenters, mercants, etc same as in any equivalent society of the day.
If the Pharisees were a rich class probably they were mercants, but I would not make such a wide brush statement.
Some Jews were sheperds.
![]()
Patrick, your knowledge is a continuiag source of amazement to me. God bless you in this Holy Season.Nah, it’s the Sadducees who were primarily aristocratic. The Pharisees were more of a populist group composed of men from different social classes, ranging from semi-educated tradesmen and merchants to literate scribes, teachers, and legal professionals. There were rich men who were Pharisees, yes, but I should note that two of the most famous sages, Hillel and Shammai, were actually working-class poor: one was a woodcutter (one of the lowliest professions in antiquity, note) and the other did construction work. In other words, they don’t have much difference from Jesus Himself, who was a craftsman (tekton) who would have dabbled in wood-working and housebuilding and a few other odd jobs on the side. If we believe St. Paul was a Pharisee, there’s another one who supported himself by manual labor (tentmaking).
Thanks to all for the things I am learning on this website. And Easter Greetings to allPatrick, your knowledge is a continuiag source of amazement to me. God bless you in this Holy Season.
Jacob was over a thousand years removed from the Incarnation, the great Temple, the “urban” landscape of the Jerusalem of Jesus’ time.Jacob (Israel) and his entire family were shepherds. Joseph told his brothers to tell Pharaoh that they tended sheep when he brought them to introduce them to Pharaoh (See Genesis 47) I believe in the Roman Empire of Jesus’ day most people were illiterate and those who could read were given the special title “Lego” meaning “I can read.”
Thank youJacob was over a thousand years removed from the Incarnation, the great Temple, the “urban” landscape of the Jerusalem of Jesus’ time.
Regardless of the status of literacy in general in the Roman Empire, the Jews were their own nation, a subculture with their own rule and practice. Almost all Jewish men could read as they were required to read from the sacred scrolls at various times. The boys were initially taught by their mothers at home, so girls had to know how to read a bit, also.
“Lego,” in Greek, means generally “to utter.” Things Jesus says often begin lego: “I say.” (i.e., Matthew 16:18) It’s certainly possible, as you say, for it to have also referred to writing, I imagine, though I haven’t found it in Scripture. But they hardly refer to writing in Scripture.