John 13:10

  • Thread starter Thread starter James224
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

James224

Guest
John 13 speaks of Jesus washing the feet of the Apostles. Do you think that by Jesus saying that by washing Peter’s feet he was totally clean would point to the fact that, in Baptism, we don’t need to be immersed and that pouring is acceptable?
 
John 13 speaks of Jesus washing the feet of the Apostles. Do you think that by Jesus saying that by washing Peter’s feet he was totally clean would point to the fact that, in Baptism, we don’t need to be immersed and that pouring is acceptable?
That might be stretching it a bit. Cross reference with Exodus 40:12 and 40:30-32.
 
I think Jesus was making a point that you must be willing to serve others as a Christian.
 
John 13 speaks of Jesus washing the feet of the Apostles. Do you think that by Jesus saying that by washing Peter’s feet he was totally clean would point to the fact that, in Baptism, we don’t need to be immersed and that pouring is acceptable?
D-R Bible, Haydock Commentary:

Ver. 10. He that is washed, &c. The feet are always apt to contract some dust or dirt; and in the mystical sense, he that is washed by the sacraments of baptism, or penance, from greater sins, must still endeavour to cleanse, and purify his affections from lesser failings of human frailty. And you, my apostles, are clean from greater offences, but not all of you, meaning the traitor Judas. (Witham) — It is impossible that the extremities of the soul (if we may be allowed the expression) should not, as long as we tread upon this earth, receive some stain or other; although in the opinion of men, the soul appear just. Many indeed after baptism, are covered with the dust of sin, even to the head, but those who are disciples indeed, need only to wash their feet. (Origen, tract. 32. in Joan.) — The foulness of the feet, when the rest is clean, signifies the earthly affections, and remains of former sins remitted, which are to be cleansed by devout acts of charity and humility. (St. Ambrose, lib. iii. de Sacram. chap. 1; St. Bernard, de cæn. Dom. ser. 1.) — Though his disciples were clean, still he washed their feet, comformably to that of the Apocalypse, chap. xxii. “He that is clean, let him be cleansed still.” (Origen, tract. 32. in Joan.)
 
John 13 speaks of Jesus washing the feet of the Apostles. Do you think that by Jesus saying that by washing Peter’s feet he was totally clean would point to the fact that, in Baptism, we don’t need to be immersed and that pouring is acceptable?
The passage, in context, doesn’t seem to be concerned with the sacraments of their administration, but with a lesson in servanthood with Jesus as an example.

Here’s what the Navarre Bible Commentary on this passage says:
  1. Jewish families sacrificed a lamb on the eve of the Passover, in keeping with God’s command at the time of the exodus from Egypt when God liberated them from the slavery of Pharaoh (Exodus 12:3-14; Deuteronomy 16:1-8). This liberation prefigured that which Jesus Christ would bring about–the redemption of men from the slavery of sin by means of His sacrifice on the cross (cf. 1:29). This is why the celebration of the Jewish Passover was the ideal framework for the institution of the new Christian Passover.
Jesus knew everything that was going to happen; He knew His death and resurrection were imminent (cf. 18:4); this is why His words acquire a special tone of intimacy and love towards those whom He is leaving behind in the world. Surrounded by those whom He has chosen and who have believed in Him, He gives them His final teachings and institutes the Eucharist, the source and center of the life of the Church. “He Himself wished to give that encounter such a fullness of meaning, such a richness of memories, such a moving image of words and thoughts, such a newness of acts and precepts, that we can never exhaust our reflection and exploration of it. It was a testamentary supper, infinitely affectionate and immensely sad, and at the same time a mysterious revelation of divine promises, of supreme visions. Death was imminent, with silent omens of betrayal, of abandonment, of immolation; the conversation dies down but Jesus continues to speak in words that are new and beautifully reflective, in almost supreme intimacy, almost hovering between life and death” ([Pope] Paul VI, “Homily on Holy Thursday”, 27 March 1975).
What Christ did for His own may be summed up in this sentence: “He loved them to the end.” It shows the intensity of His love—which brings Him even to give up His life (cf. John 15:13); but this love does not stop with His death, for Christ lives on and after His resurrection He continues loving us infinitely: “It was not only thus far that He loved us, who always and forever loves us. Far be it from us to imagine that He made death the end of His loving, who did not make death the end of His living” (St. Augustine, “In Ioann. Evang.”, 55, 2).
  1. The Gospel shows us the presence and activity of the devil running right through Jesus’ life (cf. Matthew 4:1-11; Luke 22:3; John 8:44; 12:31; etc.). Satan is the enemy (Matthew 13:39), the evil one (1 John 2:13). St. Thomas Aquinas (cf. “Commentary on St. John, in loc.”) points out that, in this passage, on the one hand, we clearly see the malice of Judas, who fails to respond to this demonstration of love, and on the other hand great emphasis is laid on the goodness of Christ, which reaches out beyond Judas’ malice by washing his feet also and by treating him as a friend right up to the moment when he betrays Him (Luke 22:48).
Continued below…
 
3-6. Aware that He is the Son of God, Jesus voluntarily humbles Himself to the point of performing a service appropriate to household servants. This passage recalls the Christological hymn in St. Paul’s Letter to the Philippians: “Christ Jesus, who, though He was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied Himself, taking the form of a servant…” (Philippians 2:6-7).
Christ had said that He came to the world not to be served but to serve (Mark 10:45). In this scene He teaches us the same thing, through specific example, thereby exhorting us to serve each other in all humility and simplicity (cf. Galatians 6:2; Philippians 2:3). "Once again He preaches by example, by His deeds. In the presence of His disciples, who are arguing out of pride and vanity, Jesus bows down and gladly carries out the task of a servant…] This tactfulness of our Lord moves me deeply. He does not say: `If I do this, how much more ought you to do?’ He puts Himself at their level, and He lovingly chides those men for their lack of generosity.
“As He did with the first twelve, so also, with us, our Lord can and does whisper in our ear, time and again: `exemplum dedi vobis’ (John 13:15), I have given you an example of humility. I have become a slave, so that you too may learn to serve all men with a meek and humble heart” ([St] J. Escriva, “Friends of God”, 103).
Peter understands particularly well how thoroughly our Lord has humbled Himself, and he protests, in the same kind of way as he did on other occasions, that he will not hear of Christ suffering (cf. Matthew 8:32 and par.). St. Augustine comments: “Who would not shrink back in dismay from having his feet washed by the Son of God…You? Me? Words to be pondered on rather than spoken about, lest words fail to express their true meaning” (St. Augustine, “In Ioann. Evang.”, 56, 1).
7-14. Our Lord’s gesture had a deeper significance than St. Peter was able to grasp at this point; nor could he have suspected that God planned to save men through the sacrificing of Christ (cf. Matthew 16:22 ff). After the Resurrection the Apostles understood the mystery of this service rendered by the Redeemer: by washing their feet, Jesus was stating in a simple and symbolic way that He had not come “to be served but to serve”. His service, as He already told them, consists in giving “His life as a ransom for many” (Matthew 20:28; Mark 10:45).
Our Lord tells the Apostles that they are now clean, for they have accepted His words and have followed Him (cf. 15:3)–all but Judas, who plans to betray Him. St. John Chrysostom comments as follows: “You are already clean because of the word that I have spoken to you. That is: You are clean only to that extent. You have already received the Light; you have already got rid of the Jewish error. The Prophet asserted: Wash yourselves; make yourselves clean; remove the evil from your souls' (Isaiah 1:16).... Therefore, since they had rooted evil from their souls and were following Him with complete sincerity, He declared, in accordance with the Prophet's words: He who has bathed is clean all over’” (St. John Chrysostom, “Hom. on St. John”, 70, 3).
15-17. Jesus’ whole life was an example of service towards men, fulfilling His Father’s will to the point of dying on the Cross. Here our Lord promises us that if we imitate Him, our Teacher, in disinterested service (which always implies sacrifice), we will find true happiness which no one can wrest from us (cf. 16:22; 17:13). “`I have given you an example’, He tells His disciples after washing their feet, on the night of the Last Supper. Let us reject from our hearts any pride, any ambition, any desire to dominate; and peace and joy will reign around us and within us, as a consequence of our personal sacrifice” ([St] J. Escriva, “Christ Is Passing By”, 94).
 
No. Jesus just made an example that the greatest was to serve the lowest. It was just a lesson of humbleness. Nothing about baptism.
 
Thanks everyone! I especially love the Haydock Commentary. I read all of your posts - thatnks for your effort!
 
I don’t think it’s so simple as some of you have replied. Jesus washing the feet of the disciples is a very powerful example of humility and service to others, and possibly more than that. But, Peter’s question to Jesus and then the answer given should not be written off as just a part of the story. I’m sure this little aside in the story is much richer than that. I can’t remember now what I was taught, but I have learned a reference to baptism in connection to this episode. I don’t think it’s a stretch of the imagination, at all, to consider a hint to non-submersion here, or even to the need for only one baptism. I need to find my old references, so I’m a little sorry for speaking up without any backup, but some of you seem no less eager to claim that it has nothing to do with baptism, as I am eager to stake my claim that it does, or, at least, might.
 
I have seen this verse referenced as an indication that Jesus did in fact baptise the Apostles, which seems a legitimate inference. Suggesting that He was addressing the various methods by which the baptism of believers might be carried out in the future seems a bit of a stretch. We know He gave His authority to the Apostles for the administration of the Sacraments, why should we think that He must have also given specific instructions for every little thing - or that those instructions must have been recorded in Scripture?
 
In sensus plenior:

water is the word of God. (we renew our minds by the washing of His word"
The feet represent our Walk or Life (Ears hearing the word, Eyes understanding the word, Feet Walking in the word.)

When he washed their feet he was making their “walk” or life clean. So if your life is clean, the body is just flesh and it is clean too.

Associated with this is why you take your shoes off when walking on Holy ground.
The earth represents the earthly. We wear sandals so that we live a life separated from the world. But when on Holy Ground, nothing should come between God’s Holiness and our life.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top