- Status
E
EddieArent
Guest
Yeah, and do you think the bishops in Australia will get a talking to due to their letter wanting priests to marry?
S
Sean_O_L
Guest
Caveamous, EddieArent,
There are “some” very vocal dissident priests who seek a review of the married priests matter. Of course, this is a Disciplinary matter NOT A DOCTRINAL matter.
I applaud your efforts to promote the 1962 liturgy of the Mass of the Roman Rite as initially permitted by Indult. I applaud your promotion of Ecclesia Dei, etc. I point out to you you that Quo Primum of Pope St Pius V has been lawfully obrogated by Pope Paul VI - being the replacement of the then normative 1962 liturgy of Mass by the 1969 liturgy - thus making the 1969 liturgy the normative Mass of the Roman Rite.
Unfortunately, it is too easy to mix one thing with an unrelated other thing.
As you have written it, “their” refers to “the bishops in Australia” “wanting priests to marry.”! This is not the case.
There are “some” very vocal dissident priests who seek a review of the married priests matter. Of course, this is a Disciplinary matter NOT A DOCTRINAL matter.
I applaud your efforts to promote the 1962 liturgy of the Mass of the Roman Rite as initially permitted by Indult. I applaud your promotion of Ecclesia Dei, etc. I point out to you you that Quo Primum of Pope St Pius V has been lawfully obrogated by Pope Paul VI - being the replacement of the then normative 1962 liturgy of Mass by the 1969 liturgy - thus making the 1969 liturgy the normative Mass of the Roman Rite.
Unfortunately, it is too easy to mix one thing with an unrelated other thing.
B
bear06
Guest
Once again it would seem that we’re back to the “If they can do something wrong why can’t SSPX do something wrong too?” argument. Disobedient is disobedient.
- Status