Judas Ordained A Priest?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rogerteder
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

Rogerteder

Guest
The council of Trent taught that when Jesus said “Do this in remembrance of me.” He instituted the priesthood and ordained the first priests. Was Judas ordained a priest? It seems as if he was. Does ayone ave any links or marticles on this?🙂
 
I think Judas left the Seder early…I don’t think he received the Eucharist
 
Unfortunately you may or may not be mistaken, depending on the Gospel and how you choose to interpret said Gospel. Of the Four Gospel only three have institution narratives. Of those three Matthew and Mark have the same basic story for the order of the events of the Lord’s Supper. In Mt 26: 21-25 we are told how Jesus announces He will be betrayed. Mt. 26: 26-29 are the actual institution narrative. In Mark the same pattern exists: Mk 14: 18-21 is the Betrayal, 22-25 the institution narrative. The problem with you argument is that in these Gospel the exit of Judas is not mentioned. He may have been there for the entire thing or may have left after Jesus told him He knew.

Luke on the other hand has the order of events switched. In Lk 22: 19-20 we are given the institution narrative. Verse 21 starts the story of Judas. In this Gospel Judas is most assuredly around for the commissioning.

In the end we dont know. Judas may or may not have been at the insitution, but does it really matter? the worst that can happen is we get biblical proof that preists and Bishops are supossed to be as spotless as God himself, they can still sin!
 
CUAGRAD08 said:
Unfortunately you may or may not be mistaken, depending on the Gospel and how you choose to interpret said Gospel. Of the Four Gospel only three have institution narratives. Of those three Matthew and Mark have the same basic story for the order of the events of the Lord’s Supper. In Mt 26: 21-25 we are told how Jesus announces He will be betrayed. Mt. 26: 26-29 are the actual institution narrative. In Mark the same pattern exists: Mk 14: 18-21 is the Betrayal, 22-25 the institution narrative. The problem with you argument is that in these Gospel the exit of Judas is not mentioned. He may have been there for the entire thing or may have left after Jesus told him He knew.

Luke on the other hand has the order of events switched. In Lk 22: 19-20 we are given the institution narrative. Verse 21 starts the story of Judas. In this Gospel Judas is most assuredly around for the commissioning.

In the end we dont know. Judas may or may not have been at the insitution, but does it really matter? the worst that can happen is we get biblical proof that preists and Bishops are supossed to be as spotless as God himself, they can still sin!
Click to expand...
I agree it doesnt matter. Obviously priests, Bishops, Popes etc can and do sin. It might matter though if Jesus gave Judas communion. Because satan entered Judas. How could Jesus give him his precious Body and Blood?
 
Rogerteder said:
…Because satan entered Judas. How could Jesus give him his precious Body and Blood?
Click to expand...
I would opinion that it was for the same reason he gives it to us: out of unconditional love.

The Gospels say that Jesus said to “do this in memory of me”, but they don’t record if everyone did. Maybe the eucharist was Jesus reaching out again to Judas, and maybe he let it pass. Maybe he consumed the body and blood, but then gave in to sin and tempation (as even we do today)?
 
yes popes sin 😦 or else vatican II would have been thrown out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top