B
brotherhrolf
Guest
Actually, the first six or seven John Norman books were pretty good. Unfortunately things went downhill from there.
Really…? I have not read his Arthurian series but I have been reading his Templar series and I don’t find him to be gushy. Different concept maybe?Another series of Arthurian books to avoid, sad to say, is the Steven Lawhead series–and he writes from a pro-Christian viewpoint, too.
The best adjective for his writing style is gushing–he seems to be writing for a particular female audience (Harlequin Romance I suppose) and the story and the characters suffer.
Although I thoroughly enjoy Lawhead and pretty much all his novels, and the fact that they all have a very Christian bent to them, he does include some questionable material. Such as his novel on the life of St. Patrick. In the novel Patrick is influenced by Pelagious and basically becomes a druid of sorts.Really…? I have not read his Arthurian series but I have been reading his Templar series and I don’t find him to be gushy. Different concept maybe?
I loved the Space Trilogy, especiallyThat Hideous Strength. Lewis did a really good job of his portrayal of magic, and for being a protestant, was very intune with the Catholic “sacramental imagination.”The last volume of C.S. Lewis’ “Space Trilogy”, That Hideous Strength, ties in the Arthurian mythology (specifically, Merlin and Logres) with J.R.R. Tolkien’s Middle Earth world and the world Lewis created (or modified, as it’s supposed to take place in Earth, Mars and Venus, late 30’s-early 50’s). Well worth reading, as are the other two volumes in the series - Out of the Silent Planet (the first volume) and Perelandra.