KJV accuratcy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Montie_Claunch
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Montie_Claunch

Guest
Overlooking the missing books from the King James Verison, How accurate is the ol’ KJV? Thanks and God bless.
 
Montie Claunch:
Overlooking the missing books from the King James Verison, How accurate is the ol’ KJV? Thanks and God bless.
It is not bad, but it is heck to read! I like the Douay-Rheims. It has all of the missing books, is probably the best translation in English, and it is pretty easy to read.
 
Montie Claunch:
Overlooking the missing books from the King James Verison, How accurate is the ol’ KJV? Thanks and God bless.
There are booby traps in it – such as the over emphasis on salvation through faith alone and on witchcraft (James himself believed in witches.)
 
Well, I’m not a Scripture Scholar or anything, but here is my understanding on the KJV.

Since it’s first publication, there have been some 20,000 edits and corrects made to the King James version of the Bible.

The Old Testament version in the King James, is based on the Hebrew version of the OT, whereas, the Catholic Bible uses the Septuagint(Greek) version of the OT, which was the version used by the early Christian Church. The Septuagint has 7 more books than the Hebrew Version of the OT.

For Centuries after the destcution of Jerusalem, Jews claimed that the Septuagint was never used by Jews as being valid. However, the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls proved them wrong, in that they contained both the Septuagint and Hebrew versions of the OT.

Also, 80% of the Old Testament references and quotes made in the New Testament are in the Septuagint Version of the Old Testament. Use of the Septuagint OT when reading the New Testament, is more favorable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top