Your advice works fine for others; perhaps you can apply it to yourself, too.He has as much a right to post what he wants as you do.
Geez, here’s a novel thought: if you don’t like the conversation, stay out of the kitchen.
Really, how disingenuous can you be? The Roman Missal was revised in 1969 for the exact same reason that the Tridentine Missal was issued in 1570; it was ordered by a Council.
rolleyes, then that is your right, but it doesn’t lessen the truth of what Frosty conveyed.The Church is two thousand years old. A hallmark of our generation/society is a lack of perspective. I question why anyone would be offended by the term Novus Ordo. Perhaps they wish to hide the historical perspective of the new order.
It’s not a revision, it’s a new Mass. Bugnini himself admitted to this fact.Really, how disingenuous can you be? The Roman Missal was revised in 1969 for the exact same reason that the Tridentine Missal was issued in 1570; it was ordered by a Council.
Also, what Frosty has related has been repeated here many times by sources of knowledge far greater than yours or mine. If you wish to dispense with the reality of the situation by branding it “relativism”