LAUDATO SI - Action Items

  • Thread starter Thread starter John_Cocktosen
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

John_Cocktosen

Guest
Ok, I scanned through the document and most of it is stating the problems. So if I want to be a good catholic and just do what the pope tells me then what are my action items that I should implement? I didn’t see a list or examples of what to do. Maybe someone who has read it more thoroughly can point me in the right direction.
 
Ok, I scanned through the document and most of it is stating the problems. So if I want to be a good catholic and just do what the pope tells me then what are my action items that I should implement? I didn’t see a list or examples of what to do. Maybe someone who has read it more thoroughly can point me in the right direction.
You need to read the document and make up your own mind. You must understand that the Encyclical said many things which no one is conscience bound to agree with. Nor are the political, economic solutions binding on anyone’s conscience. Do you believe global warming is taking place, do you believe it is man made or largely so, do you believe man can solve it, do you believe the CO2 is harmful to the environment, do believe that air-conditioning is harmful to the environment? Well, you are not required to believe any of these things because none of them have been proven true.

But to solve the environmental problems the document proposes an international body with the authority to set policy and enforce it. Sounds like something designed to deprive nations of their political autonomy and replace it by a kind of world government. No one has to agree to such policies. No one, no nation is ever conscience bound to sacrifice their national soverignty.for any reason.

So read it yoursefl, a chapter at a time.

Linus2nd
 
But to solve the environmental problems the document proposes an international body with the authority to set policy and enforce it. Sounds like something designed to deprive nations of their political autonomy and replace it by a kind of world government. No one has to agree to such policies. No one, no nation is ever conscience bound to sacrifice their national soverignty.for any reason.
There is nothing so remarkable about calling for international agreements. Nations have been submitting to such things for hundreds of years. They are called treaties. What Francis is proposing could easily be implemented by a series of treaties. Don’t try to scare us with the boogy man of “one world governement”, because it just isn’t called for in this case.
 
There is nothing so remarkable about calling for international agreements. Nations have been submitting to such things for hundreds of years. They are called treaties. What Francis is proposing could easily be implemented by a series of treaties. Don’t try to scare us with the boogy man of “one world governement”, because it just isn’t called for in this case.
Well, read the document for yourself.

Linus2nd
 
From what I gathered from reading it, the “action item” was a general call to dialogue and discussion in good faith to come up with solutions. The Pope merely laid out what appears to him to be the problems and what the relevant principles we need to keep in mind when trying to solve them, but he didn’t himself provide any specific solutions.
 
From what I gathered from reading it, the “action item” was a general call to dialogue and discussion in good faith to come up with solutions. The Pope merely laid out what appears to him to be the problems and what the relevant principles we need to keep in mind when trying to solve them, but he didn’t himself provide any specific solutions.
Agreed. It does sound like people are misunderstanding this encyclical as an “environmental” encyclical when it is better understood as an ecological encyclical. It’s main point is for us to be aware of and understand better how our interactions have a real and lasting impact on the world around us. It is not just about plants and animals, it’s primarily about human beings. Our adoption of a throwaway culture has resulted in things like abortions, the devaluing of human complimentarity, poverty, and environmental degradation, most obviously in climate change.

He’s not proposing “X% of reductions in greenhouse gas emissions using A, B, and C methods” rather he is trying to do what you just said, to have a dialogue and discussion in good faith and through that to come up with solutions that uphold human dignity and respect for all creation.
 
Ok, I scanned through the document and most of it is stating the problems. So if I want to be a good catholic and just do what the pope tells me then what are my action items that I should implement? I didn’t see a list or examples of what to do. Maybe someone who has read it more thoroughly can point me in the right direction.
I found a lot of things:

Use less AC – we’ve turned our from 79 to 82, just at the point of feeling slight discomfort, for the sake of the kingdom of God.
55…People may well have a growing ecological sensitivity but it has not succeeded in changing their harmful habits of consumption which, rather than decreasing, appear to be growing all the more. A simple example is the increasing use and power of air-conditioning…
Reduce, reuse, recycle, becoming energy/resource efficient/conservative:
22…We have not yet managed to adopt a circular model of production capable of preserving resources for present and future generations, while limiting as much as possible the use of nonrenewable resources, moderating their consumption, maximizing their efficient use, reusing and recycling them. A serious consideration of this issue would be one way of counteracting the throwaway culture which affects the entire planet…

169…Reducing greenhouse gases requires honesty, courage and responsibility,…

180…on the national and local levels, much still needs to be done, such as promoting ways of conserving energy. This would include favouring forms of industrial production with maximum energy efficiency and diminished use of raw materials, removing from the market products which are less energy efficient or more polluting, improving transport systems, and encouraging the construction and repair of buildings aimed at reducing their energy consumption and levels of pollution. [caulking windows, increasing a home’s insulation, etc come to mind here.]]

211…avoiding the use of plastic and paper, reducing water consumption, separating refuse, cooking only what can reasonably be consumed, showing care for other living beings, using public transport or car-pooling, planting trees, turning off unnecessary lights, or any number of other practices. All of these reflect a generous and worthy creativity which brings out the best in human beings. Reusing something instead of immediately discarding it, when done for the right reasons, can be an act of love which expresses our own dignity.

222…Christian spirituality proposes a growth marked by moderation and the capacity to be happy with little. It is a return to that simplicity which allows us to stop and appreciate the small things, to be grateful for the opportunities which life affords us, to be spiritually detached from from what we possess, and not to succumb to sadness for what we lack. This implies avoiding the dynamic of dominion and the mere accumulation of pleasures.
223. Such sobriety, when lived freely and consciously, is liberating. It is not a lesser life or one lived with less intensity. On the contrary, it is a way of living life to the full. In reality, those who enjoy more and live better each moment are those who have given up dipping here and there, always on the look-out for what they do not have. They experience what it means to appreciate each person and each thing, learning familiarity with the simplest things and how to enjoy them. So they are able to shed unsatisfied needs, reducing their obsessiveness and weariness. Even living on little, they can live a lot, above all when they cultivate other pleasures and find satisfaction in fraternal encounters, in service, in developing their gifts, in music and art, in contact with nature, in prayer. Happiness means knowing how to limit some needs which only diminish us, and being open to the many different possibilities which life can offer.

Go on renewable energy (when feasible, of course):
26…There is an urgent need to develop policies so that, in the next few years, the emission of of carbon dioxide and other highly polluting gases can be drastically reduced, for example, substituting for fossil fuels and developing sources of renewable energy…

164…developing renewable and less polluting forms of energy…

Of course, these are general guidelines – it is up to us to figure out which things out of the 1000s of possible measures we can do to reduce, reuse, recycle, become energy & resource conservative & efficient, and go on renewable energy when feasible and affordable.

And to pressure businesses to provide these better alternatives and become themselves better stewards of creation in their operations and gov reps to help bring about this more healthy and environmentally sound world. Make sure one’s school and church are on the right track.
 
Ok, I scanned through the document and most of it is stating the problems. So if I want to be a good catholic and just do what the pope tells me then what are my action items that I should implement? I didn’t see a list or examples of what to do. Maybe someone who has read it more thoroughly can point me in the right direction.
Maybe the problem is with your idea that being a good Catholic is “just doing what the Pope tells me.”

Maybe the Pope is more interested in awakening the conscience than in laying down exact prescriptions.

Edwin
 
Here’s some positive news:

“New Zealand Will Shutter Last Remaining Coal Power Plants, Officials Say”
e360.yale.edu/digest/new_zealand_will_shutter_last_remaining_coal_power_plants_officials_say/4503/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+YaleEnvironment360+%28Yale+Environment+360%29

“New Zealand will close its last remaining coal plants and rely even more heavily on renewable sources for its electricity needs, the country’s energy minister announced Thursday. New Zealand already has the fourth-largest share of renewable electricity generation in the world, with roughly 80 percent of its energy needs met by renewables. The final two coal-fired power plants will shut down by December 2018, according to the utility company running the plants, which cited changing market conditions that have made coal power unnecessary in New Zealand. The nation has been using coal to fill gaps in dry years, when hydropower could not meet the grid’s demand. But recent investments in wind and, particularly, geothermal energy have made that stopgap measure unnecessary, the energy minister said. The country has pledged ahead of the Paris climate summit to cut emissions to 30 percent below 2005 levels by 2030 and is aiming to meet 90 percent of its electricity needs with renewables by 2025.”

The U.S. has a long way to go, but we can also do much much better in this regard…
 
Just got this re coal in the U.S.: “King Coal, Long Besieged, Is Deposed by the Market” NY Times, August 6, 2015, at nytimes.com/2015/08/07/business/energy-environment/coal-industry-wobbles-as-market-forces-slug-away.html?emc=edit_th_20150807&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=42795222&_r=0

Here’s how I responded on the Environmental Anthropology listserv that send me the link:

One down, 2 to go (gas and oil).

We got a notice a few months ago that they plan to frack under my house, under a large residential area in a Edingburg, Texas (pop. 82,000), including under 2 elementary schools. The drilling company didn’t expect any pushback, but that’s what they got at the city hall hearing. They have for the time being withdrawn their permit application, but we expect they will be back in full force in the future…

It’s too bad our country considers drinking water a commodity that can be replaced with ?? Agent Orange orange juice or poison – see “American Orange” trailer re a Superfund site in a nearby town at youtube.com/watch?v=zdobt3POUCo – and not a source of life or a right of all people. As you all may know from GASLAND Cheney’s 2005 Energy Policy Act they Safe Drinking Water Act was altered to exclude fracking injection fluids (except diesel) from regulation, so poisonous drinking water for human consumption is considered perfectly okay by U.S. standards…and for livestock and crops that will make it to our plates.

Another problem in South Texas is hydrogen sulfide outgassing from fracking operations, poisoning the air. But not to worry, the Texas Commission on Env Quality (our state EPA) puts air monitors 20 miles away to monitor the air from fracking operations, and guess what, has found no health risks as all, even tho people living next to such operations are sick and dying. See “Fracking the Eagle Ford Shale: Big Oil And Bad Air On The Texas Prairie” at youtube.com/watch?v=l4UR3ELYT6U.

Perhaps the future is now, since it’s possible if AGW progresses and goes into hysteresis H2S outgassing from super-anoxic oceans may be our progeny’s fate – see “Massive release of hydrogen sulfide to the surface ocean and atmosphere during intervals of oceanic anoxia” at www3.geosc.psu.edu/~jlm80/Geosc497/Kump2005burp.pdf

It seems elsewhere Pope Francis has spoken against harms from fracking, so this is something we should also oppose. Which means we need to take his advice about getting more and more into energy/resource efficiency/conservation and alt energy when feasible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top