C
Chris-WA
Guest
Is it true that a temple-married man may remarry in the temple if his wife passes away, but a temple-married woman cannot do the same if her husband passes away? If so, why?
I’m quite familiar with LDS doctrine, but this one issue seems to be one Mormons just don’t talk about. It’s not in their distant history–it’s now and continuing. I would really like to hear from LDS how they feel about this, and I’ve yet to hear an explanation as to why this is so.Hi Chris,
Yes , it is indeed true that a man can marry more than once in the Mormon temples while a woman may not. The Mormon church goes so far as to teach that a man will be allowed to have more than one wife in the “Celestial Kingdom” - the highest degree of Heaven in their theology. Why? I am not really sure. I think this doctrine/practice is to keep alive the doctrine of “Plural Marrige” or polygamy. It is interesting to note that the church changed their stance on polygamy while applying to be part of the USA. The federal govenment was quite reluctant to admit what would be come Utah because of this practice. Their “prophet” had a “revelation” that is was not necessary to practice polygamy.
Those who practice polygamy now days are generally members of the FLDS, an dissident group. The larger church based in Salt Lake City does not practice that doctrine and in fact excommunicates those who do .
My great great grandfather had 3 wives. I should tell you that I used to be LDS. I am so grateful that God has given me the privilege of being part of Holy Mother Church.
Gramps,
Why can’t a woman be sealed to more than one husband, but a man can to as many wives? Was this instructed of the Lord?
Ace
Ace,
The purpose of plural marriage (1 man to multiple wives) is explained here in Jacob:
askgramps.org/wp-content/uploads/Bible-book-Mormon2-240x300.jpgJacob 2:30
30 For if I will, saith the Lord of Hosts, raise up seed unto me, I will command my people; otherwise they shall hearken unto these things.
Doctrine & Covenants 132:58-66 gives much further clarification. Particularly verse 63 also gives the purpose:
63 But if one or either of the ten virgins, after she is espoused, shall be with another man, she has committed adultery, and shall be destroyed; for they are given unto him to multiply and replenish the earth, according to my commandment, and to fulfil the promise which was given by my Father before the foundation of the world, and for their exaltation in the eternal worlds, that they may bear the souls of men; for herein is the work of my Father continued, that he may be glorified.
This commandment is the way that the Lord would help fulfill the Abrahamic covenant.
Gramps
They probably keep hoping that Washington will change its mind about what constitutes a valid marriage.I’m quite familiar with LDS doctrine, but this one issue seems to be one Mormons just don’t talk about.
No. Both may get married in the temple, but the man may remarry for eternity, while the woman may only remarry for Time unless she gets her first sealing broken.Is it true that a temple-married man may remarry in the temple if his wife passes away, but a temple-married woman cannot do the same if her husband passes away? If so, why?
Both Women and Men can be resealed in the temple. It is easier however for men to be resealed. The women has to go thru the defined process to become unsealed from the original husband. My understanding is that it is along the same lines of getting a marriage annulled in the CC. I have heard that is it a difficult process, but I have also heard that it is easier than getting an annullement in the CC. It all depends on the reasoning, such as death, rape, abuse etc…
It’s comparable, yes, you are well-informed. But not quite as difficult. For example, I think that you’d find it harder to get an annulment for a one-time adultery, or other similar issues related to unworthiness. (And no, that’s not my story; I’m a strict booze fiend.)