T
Tiffse
Guest
What is the church’s position on the movie, Luther (2003) starring Joseph Fiennes? Is it historically accurate?
This is to be expected, as indulgences is the topic used for the Reformation. I found the same faults and misunderstandings in the film on Luther put out 50 years ago.The film also promotes an erroneous understanding of indulgences. While it is certain that abuses involving their dispensation did occur, the film mistakes those abuses for official church teaching.
But how accurate could it be when the historical Martin Luther was a 300 lb fat guy and Joseph Fiennes was slim?What is the church’s position on the movie, Luther (2003) starring Joseph Fiennes? Is it historically accurate?
Did it show the scene where he threw the bottle of ink at the Devil? (The stain is still there on the wall – I’ve seen it.)But how accurate could it be when the historical Martin Luther was a 300 lb fat guy and Joseph Fiennes was slim?
Do you mean: TRIUMPH OF THE WILL. ?The movie is good, but it is a complete joke for accuracy. Imagine Hitler making a movie on why he was soo great.
Well the theses were written as a foundation for a debate by scholars on ‘what are indulgences and how they should be presented’. Luther was seeing a misunderstanding and also finding that some were teaching incorrectly what indulgences do for the person. In reading the theses you will find he supports the Pope and wants him to insure that the teachings are right.I read Luther’s 95 Theses a couple of years ago and was amazed to find how they are all essentially about indulgences. I expected to find points about the worship of icons, or confessing to God and not a priest, or all of the other things that the Protestants told me were wrong about the Catholic Church.
I also like historic films but the Luther movie went sour for me when he delivers his homilies, not from a pulpit, but while wandering around the main aisle of a medevel church ,for all the world looking like he’s lecturing at a modern business symposium.I was considering renting Luther also for the same reason as Fizendell; I like historical drama.
I saw Cate Blanchett in Elizabeth, which was one on the most historically inaccurate films I’ve seen, but it was beautiful to watch. The acting, costumes and settings were magnificent.
Aint’t that the truth kinda like the movies that have a slim Henry the VII battling the Pope and wooing ANN Bolyenn. Both of these church dissidents were fat toads. Why Hollwood has Richard Burton and Joseph Fines playing these toads are beyond me.But how accurate could it be when the historical Martin Luther was a 300 lb fat guy and Joseph Fiennes was slim?
He was a professor. In that scene, he was “wandering around the main aisle” of his college classroom lecturing to his students not “delivering his homilies.”I also like historic films but the Luther movie went sour for me when he delivers his homilies, not from a pulpit, but while wandering around the main aisle of a medevel church ,for all the world looking like he’s lecturing at a modern business symposium.![]()