Magdalen & Da Vinci Code

  • Thread starter Thread starter HagiaSophia
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
H

HagiaSophia

Guest
A new Catholic website aimed at Da Vinci fans is timed to coincide with today’s feast of St Mary Magdalene, depicted in the book as the sacred vessel, or Holy Grail, who bore Jesus Christ’s children. The site, designed by the Catholic Enquiry Office (CEO), a national office of the Church, includes biographies of St Mary, Bible extracts, prayers, articles, web links, images and a cake recipe.

Website: life4seekers.co.uk/TheDaVinciCode-resources.htm

It includes question-andanswer sessions listing alleged historical, artistic and religious errors in the book, such as its depiction of the Catholic organisation Opus Dei.

The website promotes Mary Magdalene, believed to have been a former prostitute, as a “faithful follower” of Jesus Christ who had done wrongs but whose life was changed by her experience of God’s “unconditional love and mercy”. The Church is hoping not only to counter the book’s claim of a secret bloodline descended from Jesus and Mary Magdalene, but also to capitalise on the increased interest in Christianity that the work has generated.

Since the death of Pope John Paul II, the Catholic Agency to Support Evangelisation, set up last year, has been fielding six inquiries a day or more from callers interested in converting to Catholicism. The Da Vinci Code has sold 25 million copies worldwide. Filming takes place next month at Lincoln Cathedral for sections of the book set in Westminster Abbey. The film, starring Sir Ian McKellen, Tom Hanks and Audrey Tautou, is to be made in Lincoln after the Abbey refused permission, denouncing the book as theologically unsound.

Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the prelate appointed by the Vatican to defend the Church’s reputation, has described the novel as a “castle of lies” that “distorted” the truth.

Cardinal Bertone, the Archbishop of Genoa, says that the novel is a deliberate attempt to discredit the Catholic Church through absurd and vulgar falsifications.

The Catholic Church in England and Wales believes that the book’s success reveals “a widespread thirst for the truth” and hopes that its own website will be “of service” to Brown enthusiasts.

Monsignor Keith Barltrop, the director of the CEO, said: “We are not trying to take on The Da Vinci Code.” Rather the Church was “shameless” in availing itself of the chance to evangelise, he said.

He added: “There is huge interest in the book. It poses as the truth but it clearly is not. It is a damn good read but it is a long way from the truth.

“People are engaged in a lot of things, from aromatherapy through to tarot cards to this sort of thing. Rather than be negative about it, we see it as symptomatic of a seeking mentality that, for whatever reason, does not get channelled to organised religion.”

He said that The Da Vinci Code appealed because it came across as “unorthodox, exciting and risky”. He added: “That answers something quite powerful in people.”

timesonline.co.uk/article/0,3-1703838,00.html
 
I’m glad that they’re trying to bring good out of the whole DaVinci Code thing. It does seem like our world is searching for something, but people seem to be buying into so many counterfeits. Hopefully this will lead them to the Truth that will set them free.

I also once read something that said that the DaVinci Code was a great opportunity to bring more people to a better understanding of the Theology of the Body:
Steve Kellmeyer:
All of us attacked Dan Brown for his numerous historical inaccuracies, but those inaccuracies were throw-away lines for him. His lousy history was just the delivery system for an articulate philosophy. Throughout his book, Brown insists on three things: (1) marriage is holy, (2) sex is holy and (3) women are to be treated as images of God. The whole book is spent emphasizing and re-emphasizing those three points.

He mis-represented Christ’s sex life so he could talk about adult sex lives. Like most of secular society, he does not believe Christians have anything useful to say about sex. So, he simply substituted pagan terms for three Christian concepts. He didn’t speak of the sacredness of marriage, he used an Egyptian pagan term, Hieros Gamos. He extolled pagan goddess worship (ritualized sex), he insisted Jesus was married all in order to prove sex is holy. Instead of saying women are made in the image and likeness of God, he used pagan terminology: they are goddesses. He insisted that ‘Christians think sex is dirty’ to justify this paganized wording.

These three facts - holy sex, holy marriage, women are to be treated as holy - made his book tremendously popular because these three facts are true. They are, in fact, the only true things the secular culture has said about sex in the last forty years.
Something to think about…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top