S
Sir2v4
Guest
I watched all the ten hours of this condensed documentary about the alleged involvement of two men in the homicide of a female magazine representative.
I can’t make up my mind about the conviction of Steven Avery. It seems to revolve around the results from the FBI blood sample analysis. I think that analysis was incompetent, as it was a special test that the FBI had to develop just for this case.
It seems like there was a rush to judgment about the involvement of Avery. Aside from the questionable blood analysis, I can’t believe that he would be so clumsy to leave all the evidence on his property.
In a television police program, the police would look at the husband a lot closer than seems to have been done in this case. I can’t say Avery is guilty or innocent, but I don’t think the prosecution proved its case.
I can’t make up my mind about the conviction of Steven Avery. It seems to revolve around the results from the FBI blood sample analysis. I think that analysis was incompetent, as it was a special test that the FBI had to develop just for this case.
It seems like there was a rush to judgment about the involvement of Avery. Aside from the questionable blood analysis, I can’t believe that he would be so clumsy to leave all the evidence on his property.
In a television police program, the police would look at the husband a lot closer than seems to have been done in this case. I can’t say Avery is guilty or innocent, but I don’t think the prosecution proved its case.