Do you really think the only real violence that can be perpetrated against the person, is physical?
Sarah x
My fundamental values
As catholic lay person, my line is the respect of moral natural law of human beings, I mean the humanity, male and female, created by God. My natural values are coming from the Creator. The humanity is composed of males with all the corollaries and also is composed of females with all the corallaries.
In front of God, we are equal in dignity with the same rights, duties and obligations and with special rights, duties and obligations in function of sex: this is the equality and the equity in function of sex. The male is a man, the female is a woman. Man has to stay male, woman has to stay female. Man does not have to want be a female, woman does not have to want be a male, each gender (sex) has to accept its body, its soul with their own corollaries. This is the dual humanity, body and soul and male and female: it is the nature wanted by God. The male has to respect the female and the female has to respect the male.
Because of the original sin and the bad effect of concupiscence, the male wants to dominate the female, and the woman want to seduce, in the wrong way, the male. As catholic, we have to avoid that. it is a moral obligation. Each one has to try to respect its vocation of male and its vocation of female. As catholic man, I have to have a huge consideration for the woman. In my mind, woman is the most beautiful creature of the creation, she is on the top of the natural creation wanted by God. She is potential lover, potential wife and potential mother. For a catholic man, she has to be his natural complementarity. For a catholic, woman is so divine. The bashing of woman is a social and moral scandal. It is very immoral. It is absurd. I do not tolerate that. I am very sad of that.
In the marriage, the woman is or should be the " New Eve of her Man " and the " Saint Mary Magdalene of her husband ", I mean: the Female, the Fiancée, the Bride, the Sweetheart, the Love, the Mistress, the Lover, the Beloved, the Muse, the Friend, the Best-friend, the Girlfriend, the Helper, the Soul-Mate, the Companion, the Partner, the Associate, the Wife and the Potential Mother, the Educator, the Teacher, the Professor, the Thinker, the Philosopher, the Schoolgirl, the Pupil, the Student, the Follower, the Female Opposite Number, the Alterity, the Complementarity, the Princess, the Queen, the Doctress, the Nurse, the Guide of her Husband and the Person who reveals in him, his part of feminity and helps his masculinity. Female has to understand the normal sexuality of her male. Wife is the teacher of the sexuality of her husband, she is also the professor of the sexuality of her husband, and then she is the doctor and love’s master of the sexuality of her husband.
In the marriage, the man is or should be to be the " New Adam of his wife" and the " Holy Beloved of his wife" , I mean: the Male, the Fiancé, the Bridegroom, the Sweetheart, the Love, the Lover, the Beloved, the Companion, the Friend, the Best friend, the Boy-friend, the Helper, the Soul-Mate, the Companion, the Partner, the Associate, the Husband and the potential Father, the Educator, the Teacher, the Professor, the Thinker, the Philosopher, the Master, the Mentor, the Follower, the Schoolboy, the Pupil, the Student, the Male Opposite Number, the Alterity, the Complementarity, The Prince, The King, the Doctor, the Nurse, the Guide of his Wife, and The Person who reveals in her, her part of masculinity and helps her feminity. Husband is the teacher of the sexuality of his wife, he is also the professor of the sexuality of his wife, and then he is the doctor and love’s master of the sexuality of his wife.
In conclusion:
the Masculinism, the radical feminism, the sexism from male, the sexism from female, the theory of gender, the misandry, the misogyny, the theoretical homosexualism, the negationism of alterity and of the complementarity of male and female, the negationism of the sexuation, the relativism of the sexuation…etc. All those heresies or those ideologies are wrong, are dangerous, are not very natural. As catholic, I have to avoid them. And there are two type of wrong approaches: by nature, by essence, by substance or by circumstances and intentions. Their moral regimes are not the same and have to be different, it is not negotiable. Here, the radical feminism is not on the same line than me and than the catholic church, it is the issue.
Of course, there are moral , mental, physical and psychological violence, but also a degree.
The wrong subtance and the wrong intentions and circumstance make the difference: not totally equal. These are the issue and the moral debate.
