Marriage and wedding questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter pioneer1572
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P.S. The link provided by “Just Lurking” refers to the so-called Petrine Privilege. The requirements for that dissolution are different than those for the Pauline Privilege.
Thanks for the correction!
The encyclopedia is speaking of a scenario where no one is Catholic. So, if our second wife Betty was another Lutheran, for example, the privilege would still apply.
I have a question in this case: Suppose Betty (Lutheran) and Fred (Lutheran) divorce. Now Fred wants to marry Cathy, who is Catholic and free to marry. Can Fred use ligamen/prior bond to annul his marriage with Betty, and then use the Pauline or Petrine privilege to dissolve his marriage to Wilma upon his marriage to Cathy?
 
Originally Posted by pioneer1572
I have to say that I’ve seen the paperwork asking for such dispensations from form in the case of many a mixed-marriage and a simple “For the spiritual welfare of the couple” has been the usual reason for the request. I’ve not seen any such requests refused. I guess it depends on the bishop.
 
That is my understanding as well, but I believe there is an additional requirement that a priest (of the local diocese? or possibly just deputed by the local pastor) needs to be present at the wedding (not necessarily officiating in any way, could be just as a guest).

But Joe has given the best advice, talk to the priest.

–Jen
No, once the dispensation from form has been granted it falls to the Catholic party to inform the diocese and the parish that the marriage has been celebrated. No official ‘Church presence’ is required at the wedding.
 

I have a question in this case: Suppose Betty (Lutheran) and Fred (Lutheran) divorce. Now Fred wants to marry Cathy, who is Catholic and free to marry. Can Fred use ligamen/prior bond to annul his marriage with Betty, and then use the Pauline or Petrine privilege to dissolve his marriage to Wilma upon his marriage to Cathy?
Hello,

Well, since I am of the opinion that Betty and Fred (Lutherans) would have been validly married only because the Pauline privilege dissolved Fred’s first marriage, that procedure would not be acceptable.

The process you laid out is used if, for example, Fred and Betty were also unbaptized and then Fred becomes a Christian, Betty leaves, and he wants to marry Cathy. This is getting into esoteric stuff…and somewhat off-topic. So, I’ll leave it at that. It’s too late in the day for me to think clearly enough to explain other possible scenarios.

Dan
 
Catholics are bound to get married according to canonical form. The Church can grant dispensation from canonical form. If dispensation from canonical form is granted the marriage is valid and there would be need for a convalidation.
^^I believe you meant to say “there would be no need for a convalidation”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top