Married priests policy

  • Thread starter Thread starter wet-rat
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
W

wet-rat

Guest
Suppose the rules were changed to allow a married man who has been at least 25 years ordained as a permanent deacon to be ordained as a priest. Essentially this would allow a married man who has served the Church as a deacon to spend some of his retirement years as a priest.

What effect would this have on the Church?
 
Why wait 25 years? Seems like a waste of tyalent and devotion. Maybe 25 years for the deaconesses. 🙂
 
Why wait 25 years? Seems like a waste of talent and devotion. Maybe 25 years for the deaconesses. 🙂
 
They have to be 35 or older to become a permanent deacon- add 25 to that- they’d be 60 years old. I’m not sure someone that old would want to START something different like that. I don’t mean to be stereotypical here, but I would think that people close to that age would prefer to think towards retirement.
 
40.png
m134e5:
They have to be 35 or older to become a permanent deacon- add 25 to that- they’d be 60 years old. I’m not sure someone that old would want to START something different like that. I don’t mean to be stereotypical here, but I would think that people close to that age would prefer to think towards retirement.
On a side note, I had a priest at my former parish before I moved who was around 60 when he became a priest after having his marriage annuled. He wanted to spend the rest of his days serving the Church, and in a sense, making up for lost time as he believes he should have been a priest from the start. 🙂 Thanks and God Bless.
 
If we are to have married priests (other than a few converts), it would seem reasonable to wait until the children are grown and out of the house. Then there would be fewer conflicts between family and church.
 
Are not priests already married to the Church?

Deaconness were forunners of Nuns. I think they were more in the Eastern Church, not the Latin Rite.

🙂
 
A Presbyter is an elder. Grandfatherly types would make the best priests, it worked for the early church!

+T+
Michael
 
except for a few who have been hired at various jobs in the diocese, or as hospital chaplains, etc. most deacons here are retired, have income from others sources, and serve in parishes on a volunteer basis or with a small stipend and expenses covered. I don’t know of any, employed or not, who earns enough to raise a family on. Some have wives still working so they have insurance.

Until Catholics learn to tithe it will not be possible to have married priests because the average non-tithing parish does not bring enough income to support a priest with a family. This in spite of the fact that there congregations are usually much larger than neighboring Protestant or Jewish congregations who donate enough to support their pastors and rabbis in a manner comparable to the living style of the surrounding area.
 
The pastor of my parish is one of the few converts that is a married priest. And he is a very good and holy one. But all his children are grown and out of the house. This is the only situation in which I believe married men should be priests.
 
I heard that many many years ago that priests could marry and the reason why they changed this was in case of divorce that the church would be liable to pay the spouses support.
By the way how can I become a deacon or priest? My marriage has been annulled since 2000 and I am 48 yrs. old
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top