Mary The Mother Of God

  • Thread starter Thread starter Will_Pick
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
W

Will_Pick

Guest
23 Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us. KJB1611
Does the word LORD also mean God ?
I was looking for verses that will tell us that Mary was the mother of God.
 
Yes, the word LORD means God. But, the title Mother of God isn’t about such semantics. It means that since Jesus is the Son of God who is one with the Father and the Holy Spirit, conceived of Mary’s flesh and born as fully man and fully God, she can be properly entitled, the “Mother of God.”
 
The word Lord in Greek (kurios) does not always mean God (theos).

That said, this is a pretty easy one to come to for most folks. It’s important to state what “Mother of God” does not mean: It does not mean that Mary gave birth to the Trinity, nor that she is older than God the Son, the second Person of the Blessed Trinity. What it does mean is the following:
Major premise: Jesus was God.
Minor premise: Mary was the mother of Jesus.
Conclusion: Mary was the mother of God.

In order to escape this logical conclusion, you must refute either the major premise or the minor premise. It would seem that most objectors would grant both, however some assert that Jesus was not just one person - He was kinda’ like a schitzophrenic, with a God-within-him and a Him-without-God. This is the heresy known as Nestorianism. (You can learn more about the early heresies here.)

I believe one of the best “proof texts” would be John 20:28. In John 20:28 the apostle Thomas, upon seeing the resurrected Jesus, said to him, “My Lord and my God!” The Greek text literally reads, “The Lord of me and the God of me” ("ho kurios mou kai ho theos mou"). Another use where ‘kurios’ means God is in 2 Corinthians 3:16-18, where Paul identifies the Spirit with ho kurios (“the Lord”): “Whenever a person turns to the Lord the veil is removed. Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. All of us, gazing with unveiled face on the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, as from the Lord who is the Spirit.”

So it can be demonstrated that Lord and God can be used interchangably, but Lord does not necessarily mean God (although God is always Lord). It’s like saying “all apples are fruit but not all fruit are apples”. The NT writers typically use Lord (and not God) in reference to Christ in order to keep the persons of the Trinity separate and distinct, and prevent the Modalist heresy (linked above).

Please let me know if further clarification is needed.

God Bless,
RyanL

P.S.
I’m sure you’ve already found it, but there’s also Luke 1:43, where Elizabeth says to Mary:
And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?
 
When the Archangel Gabriel announced to our Lady that her Son would “reign forever” (Luke 1:32-33), he implicitly revealed that she was to become the Mother of a Divine Person.
Only God can reign forever.
 
40.png
RyanL:
The word Lord in Greek (kurios) does not always mean God (theos).

That said, this is a pretty easy one to come to for most folks. It’s important to state what “Mother of God” does not mean: It does not mean that Mary gave birth to the Trinity, nor that she is older than God the Son, the second Person of the Blessed Trinity. What it does mean is the following:
Major premise: Jesus was God.
Minor premise: Mary was the mother of Jesus.
Conclusion: Mary was the mother of God.

In order to escape this logical conclusion, you must refute either the major premise or the minor premise. It would seem that most objectors would grant both, however some assert that Jesus was not just one person - He was kinda’ like a schitzophrenic, with a God-within-him and a Him-without-God. This is the heresy known as Nestorianism. (You can learn more about the early heresies here.)

I believe one of the best “proof texts” would be John 20:28. In John 20:28 the apostle Thomas, upon seeing the resurrected Jesus, said to him, “My Lord and my God!” The Greek text literally reads, “The Lord of me and the God of me” ("ho kurios mou kai ho theos mou"). Another use where ‘kurios’ means God is in 2 Corinthians 3:16-18, where Paul identifies the Spirit with ho kurios (“the Lord”): “Whenever a person turns to the Lord the veil is removed. Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. All of us, gazing with unveiled face on the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, as from the Lord who is the Spirit.”

So it can be demonstrated that Lord and God can be used interchangably, but Lord does not necessarily mean God (although God is always Lord). It’s like saying “all apples are fruit but not all fruit are apples”. The NT writers typically use Lord (and not God) in reference to Christ in order to keep the persons of the Trinity separate and distinct, and prevent the Modalist heresy (linked above).

Please let me know if further clarification is needed.

God Bless,
RyanL

P.S.
I’m sure you’ve already found it, but there’s also Luke 1:43, where Elizabeth says to Mary:
Thank you but did you say Luke 1:43 does Luke have 43 verse
 
Will Pick:
Thank you but did you say Luke 1:43 does Luke have 43 verse
Actually, Luke, chapter 1, has 80 verses. RyanL’s citation of Luke 1:43 is correct.
 
Well all you have to do is to find all the verses that show Jesus to be human and then all the verses that show him to be God.

In this we see that Jesus, a person, has two natures, human and divine.

Mary, a human being, could not give birth to a nature, only a person.

This divine person is Jesus Christ who is true God and true Man.

Therefore Mary is “Mater Dei” or Mother of God.

Ken
 
Will Pick:
Thank you but did you say Luke 1:43 does Luke have 43 verse
Sorry,Sorry I was looking at the WRONG book. I feel like a fool
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top