J
Jaypeeto4
Guest
**I would also challenge your assertion that the despotic regimes you mention were “lawful” authority since the leadership in each case murdered its way to the top. How could they be “lawful”? **
I agree, but nobody, it seems, questions our American Republic.
Don’t get me wrong, I love our constitution and it’s guarantees of many freedoms,
but let’s look at this, as far as legality of Regimes goes.
Paul told the early Christians to obey the Roman Empire’s government in all things except those that disobeyed God. Yet the Roman Empire and it’s Caesars were as corrupt and despotic as could possibly be.
With that command of Paul in mind, didn’t the CHRISTIAN members of the continental Congress DISOBEY that command of Paul (and hence of God) when they decided to launch a rebellion and violent revolution against the government of King George or whoever else might have been ruling “The Colonies” at the time? Yes, the English government of the Colonies was very oppressive, but so was Rome, and Christians were NEVER AUTHORIZED by the Apostles to participate in Revolts/Revolutions.
Our government is, right or wrong, our “De Facto” political authority.
Those living in Germany during the Hitler years were living under the “De Facto” authority there, and HAD TO OBEY ORDERS or be executed themselves. Yet that didn’t excuse them when it came to the Nuremberg and other post-war trials.
“I was just doing my job” will not always get one off the hook.
If I were an executioner (and good Lord, who would WILLINGLY apply for a job like THAT??), and I heard that legitimate doubts had been raised as to the actual guilt of a convicted murderer, I don’t know that I could bring myself to perform the lethal injection.
And if the person IS actually innocent, because a prosecutor (to win the case and another feather in his career cap, and some do do this) suppressed evidence of the accused killer’s innocence, then God help him/her and anyone else involved if the execution takes place, but the especial and subjective guilt would fall upon the person who knew the accused to be innocent of murder, and suppressed the evidence.
I agree, but nobody, it seems, questions our American Republic.
Don’t get me wrong, I love our constitution and it’s guarantees of many freedoms,
but let’s look at this, as far as legality of Regimes goes.
Paul told the early Christians to obey the Roman Empire’s government in all things except those that disobeyed God. Yet the Roman Empire and it’s Caesars were as corrupt and despotic as could possibly be.
With that command of Paul in mind, didn’t the CHRISTIAN members of the continental Congress DISOBEY that command of Paul (and hence of God) when they decided to launch a rebellion and violent revolution against the government of King George or whoever else might have been ruling “The Colonies” at the time? Yes, the English government of the Colonies was very oppressive, but so was Rome, and Christians were NEVER AUTHORIZED by the Apostles to participate in Revolts/Revolutions.
Our government is, right or wrong, our “De Facto” political authority.
Those living in Germany during the Hitler years were living under the “De Facto” authority there, and HAD TO OBEY ORDERS or be executed themselves. Yet that didn’t excuse them when it came to the Nuremberg and other post-war trials.
“I was just doing my job” will not always get one off the hook.
If I were an executioner (and good Lord, who would WILLINGLY apply for a job like THAT??), and I heard that legitimate doubts had been raised as to the actual guilt of a convicted murderer, I don’t know that I could bring myself to perform the lethal injection.
And if the person IS actually innocent, because a prosecutor (to win the case and another feather in his career cap, and some do do this) suppressed evidence of the accused killer’s innocence, then God help him/her and anyone else involved if the execution takes place, but the especial and subjective guilt would fall upon the person who knew the accused to be innocent of murder, and suppressed the evidence.