S
Schism_hater
Guest
Regardless of the fact that wine is partially composed of water, wine is much more than just water, and wine is still a different drink from water. Water is composed of oxygen and hydrogen; would you be comfortable altering your ordinance so that you just inhale oxygen instead of drinking water?So if God wanted to use water instead of wine, he could not do it? And what is the percentage of water in either of them? It is symbolic.
The point is that God did not want to use water instead of wine or He would have said so. Instead every indication is that Christ intended that wine (or at least unfermented grape juice) be used.
And even the Eucharist were merely “symbolic” (and in fact it is symbolic, and it also is what is symbolized) being faithful to the manner (in its essentials) in which the sacred mysteries, or ordinances, are handed down to us is part of being faithful to God. If it doesn’t matter what is used in the ordinances, why does not the LDS baptize with lemonade, or petroleum?