S
Sean
Guest
who said it was?
I know that as early as the 70s, the Melkites were training married men for priesthood, and avoiding the hideous ban by sending them back to Antioch for ordination. Antioch then lent them back permanently to their former dioceses . . .Correct me if I’m wrong but haven’t the Melkites at times here in the U.S. sent seminarians to Antiochian seminaries?
The underlying question was about seminaries in full communion, and the suggested seminary is SSPX.who said it was?
In addition, the Melkites frequently ordain men who have been formed outside of the seminary system, in a sort of parish-based internship. They must have a master’s in theology, but the rest of their formation is determined by the bishop and does not necessarily include a formal program outside of that which can be provided by the local parish.ziapueblo:![]()
I know that as early as the 70s, the Melkites were training married men for priesthood, and avoiding the hideous ban by sending them back to Antioch for ordination. Antioch then lent them back permanently to their former dioceses . . .Correct me if I’m wrong but haven’t the Melkites at times here in the U.S. sent seminarians to Antiochian seminaries?
Today, they have multiple seminarians at the (formerly Ruthenian) Pittsburgh Seminary.
One cannot hold this belief and be “in communion” with Rome.However, the celebrant must intend to do what the Church does. The Novus Ordo Missae will no longer in and of itself guarantee that the celebrant has this intention. That will depend on his personal faith (generally unknown to those assisting).
Therefore, these Masses can be of doubtful validity.