Multiverse and Many Worlds interpretation what kind fallacies are these

  • Thread starter Thread starter YehoiakhinEx232
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Y

YehoiakhinEx232

Guest
One of the problems I’ve discovered with the Multiverse and Many Worlds interpretation proposed by Atheists and Materialists, is that they assume that these things are real based solely on mathematical equations. It’s like saying that if I type “2+2=4” on this text that somewhere in the cosmos two 2s come to together and become a 4 is there a term for this kind fallacy? Am I wording this argument correctly?

Also can any direct me to more books, articles and videos debunking these theories, particularly the multiverse?
 
One of the problems I’ve discovered with the Multiverse and Many Worlds interpretation proposed by Atheists and Materialists, is that they assume that these things are real based solely on mathematical equations. It’s like saying that if I type “2+2=4” on this text that somewhere in the cosmos two 2s come to together and become a 4 is there a term for this kind fallacy? Am I wording this argument correctly?

Also can any direct me to more books, articles and videos debunking these theories, particularly the multiverse?
There is no proof that multiverses exist, but I don’t think there is any definitive scientific reason why they could not, so there is nothing scientific that ‘debunks’ them.

You can watch this PBS documentary that gives more info:video.pbs.org/video/2168433605/
 
One of the problems I’ve discovered with the Multiverse and Many Worlds interpretation proposed by Atheists and Materialists, is that they assume that these things are real based solely on mathematical equations. It’s like saying that if I type “2+2=4” on this text that somewhere in the cosmos two 2s come to together and become a 4 is there a term for this kind fallacy? Am I wording this argument correctly?

Also can any direct me to more books, articles and videos debunking these theories, particularly the multiverse?
Here’s the issue that I have with your request. You see a theory that could possibly jeopardize your current viewpoint and your immediate reaction is to debunk it. At least have the intellectual curiosity to understand it, before you attempt to dismiss it. Much wisdom is lost when men delude themselves into believing that they already have the answers.
 
One of the problems I’ve discovered with the Multiverse and Many Worlds interpretation proposed by Atheists and Materialists, is that they assume that these things are real based solely on mathematical equations. It’s like saying that if I type “2+2=4” on this text that somewhere in the cosmos two 2s come to together and become a 4 is there a term for this kind fallacy? Am I wording this argument correctly?

Also can any direct me to more books, articles and videos debunking these theories, particularly the multiverse?
Science requires repeatable, empirical evidence to support/refute a theory. There is nothing scientific about this. In fact, the “evidence” of this theory begs the question. Anyone who claims to have discovered something from another universe also claims they know everything about ours. Otherwise, how could they know this substance is not from our universe? It would be like me discovering a neutron 100 years ago and claiming that its proof of another universe. How could they know this neutron is part of another universe and not ours? Unfortunately, it appears in this case science has become victim to a world view by those who claim such absurd fallacies (e.g. Klaus and Hawkings). Fortunately, this has been largely rejected by the physics community.

Philosophically, from what i have gathered this is a really bad attempt at the first cause argument. They simply pass the buck to something eternal we have yet to discover (and never will since its in a separate universe; how convenient). Anyways, if you’re looking for a good book concerning apologetics and physics, I would recommend, “New Proofs for the Existence of God”, by Robert Spitzer. If you enjoy modern physics and apologetics, i believe you will enjoy this one.
 
back in the mid-90’s I took a throw away college class to fulfill my requirement for one last elective in order to graduate. it was a science class called Biology and Man, which explored topics from evolution to genetics. now, I had always attended Catholic schools, from kindergarten all the way through high school and college, and while evolution was taught as a theory, it was always stressed that it’s just a theory, and then I would go off to theology class and be reassured that God created the universe. but this class was different as I took it at a local community college to save some money and just get my last 3 credits, and the professor was a legitimate scientist and an atheist. to my surprise, I ended up loving the class and the professor, and I would regularly discuss what we learned that night with him after class was over. One night, I don’t remember exactly how, but our coversation turned to my Catholic faith, and he seemed surprised that I believed in God. From the discussions we had througout the semester, I guess he assumed I believed in science and not religion (as if you cannot believe in both). I explained to him that not only have I never viewed science to be in conflict with my faith, but that it has actually strengthened it. He was even more perplexed, so I further explained that the more I learn about science, the more I become convinced that theories like evolution are true, the more I learn about the vastness of space, the billions of galaxies, the complexities of life, etc. the more I become convinced that life cannot be an accident - that there must be a God. All he could do was look at me and say, “hmm.” anyway, the point of that story is to ask why are you so concerned with disproving the multiverse theory? perhaps it’s true, perhaps it’s nonsense, but either way, what effect would it have on your faith?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top