My experience of Novus ordo Pentecost Sunday. (first time in years)

  • Thread starter Thread starter mao_now
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

mao_now

Guest
As A convert, I have for most of my catholic life assisted at the TLM now called “EF”. During my days of searching for the truth all celebrations of the Mass I attended were the Novus Ordo, now called “OF” After conversion I discovered the EF and have never went back to a liturgy of the OF. except for this past Sunday.

Now its been awhile since I have been to the OF, but I distinctly remember, how it was done in my pre conversion days, and it seems that alot has changed since then. Let me say from the start, this is not an attack on the OF nor do I doubt its validity, this is just an observation from someone who has an experience of Catholicism that has been shaped and nourished by the EF.Indeed this celebration of the OF was abuse free as far as I could tell.
so bear with me…please in charity.

The Church itself was built around 1974 its huge with very fine materials used. Lots of wood and Marble. fine metals and stained glass. Its built in the semi circular pattern, rows of pews on 3 sides but nothing behind the altar but A wall of white marble and molded plaster. On the wall is A giant molded Christ with arms in the orans position. To the left of this was A giant wooden cross. (no corpus) below was A wooden shelf on which was the tabernacle, made like A golden microwave oven. (the door even opened like one) in front was an altar that looked like an ikea table. on the same level and to the left was the ambo? A white plaster affait that had an unusual curve to it. There was some golden things attached but I couldnt make out what they were. The stained glass was modern but very nice and tasteful, as were the stations. But there were no statues or icons, and no vigil lamps, other than A very nice traditional sanctuary lamp on the wall by the tabernacle. It was the only “real” candle in the place, all others on the altar, (including the Easter candle) were fake. By that I mean they were large white cylinders that obviously were full of some kind of fuel, and they were lit and burned, but they werent wax. A parishoner told me later there were some "votive lights in back but they were all electric. I didnt notice them though.
I arrived early and the thing that first struck me was the level of noise.And the way people were dressed. Mostly shorts (men and women) and sandals and flip flops. Kind of “tennis court chic” (this is A very wealthy Parish) The more people arrived, the louder the talking as friends, family and neighbors greeted one another and caught up on the weeks events. One ot two people knelt in prayer and A few genuflected, I even saw A lady wearing A Chapel veil. But the talking was really getting loud at this time, and the choir was practicing a little.

To the left of the Sanctuary was an area I shall call the “music area” It had A large choir, An electric guitar, drums, saxophone, trombones, clarinets, and flutes, and A huge grand piano. Behind the piano was the handbell people. all of these instruments were played during the Mass.
At Mass time, A man from the choir stepped up to A lectern and said very cheerily “good morning everyone! and welcome to St…celebration of Pentecost Sunday!” the crowd responded in kind. The music began to play and the choir sing as the entrance procession started.The words to the songs appeared on the back wall. It was standard fare, 4 tiny children servers 2 boys 2 girls, in cassock and cottas, One carrying A huge oversized cross (with corpus) the others carrying those fat white cylinders, the girls with ponytails bouncing, and behind them A deacon and priest.

The vestments seemed to be made of Precious materiels ie damask and gold thread, (this is A very wealthy white Parish with A huge congo) but the style was practically undiscernible. I mean the dalmatic and chazzie were just huge pieces of precious fabric, that went to the floor. They had somekind of ophrey on them in geometric patterns and both had collars (I forget the name for that piece of tat) but at least they werent polyester with lime green vines and huge globs of purple grapes sewn on…LOL

The Mass began as usual but There was somekind of asperges.after the priest reverenced the altar, He blessed water, and he and the Deacon went amongst the people with little bowls and palm leaves sprinkling everyone. The choir sang “song of fire and water” the words were projected on the back wall. There was the gloria next, (Mass of creation) I read that on the back wall. Then the readings, But I couldnt follow them, because all of the readings were presented at one time, mixed in with bits of song from the Choir, and Dramatic voices and handbells…it was pure theater. And the curious thing was, the bits of song from the choir, was to the Traditional melody of “Veni creator Spiritus!” But it was all in English.after all of this was done. Next A man went to the front of the Choir and people stood, He said “please sit down for the sequence” This was followed by loud laughter. And then he sang the sequence, I didnt recognize the Melody or the translation, even though it was projected on the wall.Then came the Gospel there was an alleluia, the Deacon read the Gospel but seemed to show inordinate reverence to the book itself. He bowed profoundly to it, but walked right in front of the tabernacle without so much as a nod. A short 15 min homily, something about coke bottles and blades of grass employed as instruments. and how we could become instruments also when hit by the wind of the Holy Spirit. Then they began to prepare the altar, the choir sang A song. I noticed the vessels were all very nice and made of gold, in traditional designs. But the 2 little altar girls put them on the altar. even the main chalice, which was covered with A pall and purificator. It seemed like 2 little girls setting the table for their mother.The gifts were brought fwd. and the Eucharistic prayer III was used. I noticed at the preface the Priest joined his thumbs and index fingers…strange… athe consecration bells were rung, and the Priest lifted up A GIANT host. (no incense was used at all during this mass) The Eucharistic ministers lined up after the priests communion. They recieved, and then they distributed communion. A priest, deacon and about six lay people. for maybe 400 communicants.I noticed A lot of folks dashing out the doors after communion. (the crowd thinned considerably) after the vessels were cleansed. evryone sat in silence for A minute. The choir director stepped forward and made the announcements. Most of which were accompanied by loud laughter and clapping. A final blessing, and they marched out. as soon as the choir finished…the congo applauded…and it was all over…then the real talking and catching up began! It all seemed very strange to me…I was almost lost…But it made me realize this…call it what you will EF or OF there are not two uses of the one Roman rite. There are two religions battling for the soul of one Church…there can be only one…For years the Old faith put up A vicious fight for its very survival. Now it has been brought to the mainstream again…It will be interesting to see how this plays out. I dont doubt the faith of these people at this Mass…it just seemed…so innocent…so inward… These are just my thoughts and observations.
God bless
 
My church is semicicular as well. Some of what you described is clearly off the wall as far as rubrics as in the bowls of water and and palms. But as in the English “Veni” yeah that is the norm. We sang a English version of the Veni even though we had a choir to sing the Latin, and we always sing the Gloria that goes “Raise your voices, give glory to God … etc” yes I have only been to one EF in my life and it was SOOOO different. Maybe there is something to this terminology that cardinal hoyos has been using calling the EF the Gregorian Rite.
 
Why did you go to OF instead of your usual Mass? (Out of town?)

Our OF Masses are not like this at all. I’ve been to several dozen parishes in several states since becoming Catholic in 2004, and I have never seen an OF Mass like you describe.

I really wonder why it is that the Traditionalists are always the ones to discover these wild Masses. How awful for them! I’m serious. It seems really too bad that the people who are most upset about deviations from the established norm are the ones who always encounter it, while people like me who wouldn’t know the difference never run into anything other than orthodox, by the GIRM Masses.

It’s kind of like what happens at our house–when an animal lover comes over, all our cats hide in the basement, except for the fat cat with diabetes who’s always interested in getting petted. But when someone who hates cats or is allergic to cats comes over, all our cats come out and wallow all over the poor unfortunate visitor and shed and drool and sometimes even hack up a hairball on their shoes.

It’s just not fair!

Now I would be open to “new” forms of worship in Mass, as I am a convert, but I never run across Masses like some of the Traditionalist on these forums describe. The wildest thing that I have ever seen in an NO Mass is when the priest welcomes the people, he will say a few words about the feast day and explain why he is wearing a certain vestment. Really wild, right?

Another thing that I saw once is that after Mass, a crowd of people gathered around the piano, and the very talented musician played contemporary praise songs while all the people joined in. It was AFTER Mass, and to me, it was cool–after all, lots of people like to pray after Mass, right? (There was an Adoration Chapel right next to the Church, so anyone who wanted silent prayer could go there.)

But that’s the wildest. And to me, that’s pretty staid.

Where do you FIND these wild Masses anyway?! :confused:
 
Why did you go to OF instead of your usual Mass? (Out of town?)

Our OF Masses are not like this at all. I’ve been to several dozen parishes in several states since becoming Catholic in 2004, and I have never seen an OF Mass like you describe.

I really wonder why it is that the Traditionalists are always the ones to discover these wild Masses. How awful for them! I’m serious. It seems really too bad that the people who are most upset about deviations from the established norm are the ones who always encounter it, while people like me who wouldn’t know the difference never run into anything other than orthodox, by the GIRM Masses.

It’s kind of like what happens at our house–when an animal lover comes over, all our cats hide in the basement, except for the fat cat with diabetes who’s always interested in getting petted. But when someone who hates cats or is allergic to cats comes over, all our cats come out and wallow all over the poor unfortunate visitor and shed and drool and sometimes even hack up a hairball on their shoes.

It’s just not fair!

Now I would be open to “new” forms of worship in Mass, as I am a convert, but I never run across Masses like some of the Traditionalist on these forums describe. The wildest thing that I have ever seen in an NO Mass is when the priest welcomes the people, he will say a few words about the feast day and explain why he is wearing a certain vestment. Really wild, right?

Another thing that I saw once is that after Mass, a crowd of people gathered around the piano, and the very talented musician played contemporary praise songs while all the people joined in. It was AFTER Mass, and to me, it was cool–after all, lots of people like to pray after Mass, right? (There was an Adoration Chapel right next to the Church, so anyone who wanted silent prayer could go there.)

But that’s the wildest. And to me, that’s pretty staid.

Where do you FIND these wild Masses anyway?! :confused:
It’s not just the traditionalists. A friend at school and his family went to Washington, and they came across a parish that was so far off the wall, they left in the middle to go find a different one.
 
Cat, they are not so rare as you think. What you accept as “normal” may not be “normal” at all. Had I not seen such abuses with my own eyes as a cathedral chorister of 25 years, I would give you the benefit of the doubt. However, I have seen such abuses with my own two eyes both at the cathedral and at my local geographic parish five miles away. We have driven 25 miles one way for the last 25 years to attend the cathedral parish which, when not involved in diocesan events (ordinations, etc) is a far different parish.

My local geographic parish has an adoration chapel. Go to Mass and you have a band not a choir. Keyboards, guitars, drums, etc. The last time I went was the First Sunday of Advent…Pulsing drums and guitars…keyboardist flaying away. Bum, bum, bum, bum…Preeeepare Ye the way of the Lord…Godspell - the musical.

No, Cat. I am not some wild eyed traditonalist. I have indeed seen with my own two eyes and heard with my own two ears. Folks aren’t making it up. Count yourself fortunate that you have not seen such abuses but rest assured they do exist…they do exist.
 
Why did you go to OF instead of your usual Mass? (Out of town?)

Our OF Masses are not like this at all. I’ve been to several dozen parishes in several states since becoming Catholic in 2004, and I have never seen an OF Mass like you describe.

I really wonder why it is that the Traditionalists are always the ones to discover these wild Masses. How awful for them! I’m serious. It seems really too bad that the people who are most upset about deviations from the established norm are the ones who always encounter it, while people like me who wouldn’t know the difference never run into anything other than orthodox, by the GIRM Masses.

It’s kind of like what happens at our house–when an animal lover comes over, all our cats hide in the basement, except for the fat cat with diabetes who’s always interested in getting petted. But when someone who hates cats or is allergic to cats comes over, all our cats come out and wallow all over the poor unfortunate visitor and shed and drool and sometimes even hack up a hairball on their shoes.

It’s just not fair!

Now I would be open to “new” forms of worship in Mass, as I am a convert, but I never run across Masses like some of the Traditionalist on these forums describe. The wildest thing that I have ever seen in an NO Mass is when the priest welcomes the people, he will say a few words about the feast day and explain why he is wearing a certain vestment. Really wild, right?

Another thing that I saw once is that after Mass, a crowd of people gathered around the piano, and the very talented musician played contemporary praise songs while all the people joined in. It was AFTER Mass, and to me, it was cool–after all, lots of people like to pray after Mass, right? (There was an Adoration Chapel right next to the Church, so anyone who wanted silent prayer could go there.)

But that’s the wildest. And to me, that’s pretty staid.

Where do you FIND these wild Masses anyway?! :confused:
“Dear” Sister Cat,
NO, I was not out of town, I went with a friends elderly grandmother. She asked me to go with her, in the hopes it would encourage her grandson, who is my best friend. (it didnt) And I can see why.
So you see, I was not on A “Novus Ordo witch hunt” I just happened to be there, and found the liturgy Interesting. So I says to myself, “while here let me just Mystery worship this place” There was nothing “wild” at all. As I stated in the op it seemed Abuse free. Just A lot of very rich white people, and they all seemed into themselves. Everyone had some little self important “job” It was A very linear inward experience. Indeed the Worship of the most blessed Trinity, and the honor of Our Lady, were secondary at best. (or so it seemed to me) And as I said in the op, I dont doubt their faith, or innocence. but I was apalled at the banality. Just another Sunday at “Saint suburbia”
God Bless
 
But it made me realize this…call it what you will EF or OF there are not two uses of the one Roman rite. There are two religions battling for the soul of one Church…there can be only one. God bless
You’d better inform the Holy Father of that; he seems to think otherwise. Good thing we’re here to set him straight. :rolleyes:
 
You’d better inform the Holy Father of that; he seems to think otherwise. Good thing we’re here to set him straight. :rolleyes:
LOL I dont care what the Holy Father thinks, about what I wrote. I daily call down Gods blessing on him for the Motu Proprio. But it is what it is. Our Lord Pope Benedict, the sixteenth of that name…is not in the “pews” myself and many others see it for what it is…there can be only one.
And there are 2 religions in the Roman rite, stick your heads in the sand if you must.
God Bless
 
It’s kind of like what happens at our house–when an animal lover comes over, all our cats hide in the basement, except for the fat cat with diabetes who’s always interested in getting petted. But when someone who hates cats or is allergic to cats comes over, all our cats come out and wallow all over the poor unfortunate visitor and shed and drool and sometimes even hack up a hairball on their shoes.

It’s just not fair!
Cat, was this your cat in the last clip?

youtube.com/watch?v=waon5FH5Fjo&feature=related

PS I too have a diabetic cat. Might bring her to church with me if I see irreverence, whatja think? 🙂

Just teasing you, of course.
 
It’s not just the traditionalists. A friend at school and his family went to Washington, and they came across a parish that was so far off the wall, they left in the middle to go find a different one.
Washginton state? Hooo yeah. I’m over here, and I managed to walk into the one mostly orthodox, by the GIRM parish in seattle(besides the tiny, quite demeaned TLM community). The rest are pretty…out there. Even the cathedral is. It’s a Romanesque building that was remodeled on the inside with some crazy modern things.

It’s nice to hear about another NO parish that uses cassocks and cottas/surplices. I love those…albs just look bad, in my opinion.

clapping and laughing and such, icky…😦
 
Yes, but they’re still valid.

Maybe this was the same one?

youtube.com/watch?v=SZ6KWt49wIA&NR=1
:eek: That is quite possibly the scariest thing I’ve ever seen.

And I’m pretty sure that they knew it was technically a valid Mass, but I’m thinking that if I were in the same situation, I wouldn’t be comfortable staying around either. It’s not so much that it in and of itself isn’t valid, but I still wouldn’t feel comfortable being there.
 
I really wonder why it is that the Traditionalists are always the ones to discover these wild Masses. How awful for them! I’m serious. It seems really too bad that the people who are most upset about deviations from the established norm are the ones who always encounter it, while people like me who wouldn’t know the difference never run into anything other than orthodox, by the GIRM Masses.

Where do you FIND these wild Masses anyway?! :confused:
Cat, I have to admit, I’ve often wondered this myself. But it makes sense. If I were Satan and wanted to insert chaos into God’s Kingdom, I would strike at where each person’s treasure lies. I would lead devout Traditionalists to the craziest parishes in town; I would put them in the front pews where the goofiest Mass ever was being “performed” – even if it was the only time in a century such a Mass had ever taken place. Let them be discouraged about their Church, and let those who don’t understand think they are whackos.

Like you, I don’t see rampant craziness at Mass – just the occasional eye-rolling-worthy statement or symbolism. But that isn’t how Satan strikes at me – he does it in many other ways.

I promise to pray for the good men and women who are burdened by inappropriateness in our Holy Liturgy; and hope they will pray for me, too.
 
Cat, I have to admit, I’ve often wondered this myself. But it makes sense. If I were Satan and wanted to insert chaos into God’s Kingdom, I would strike at where each person’s treasure lies. I would lead devout Traditionalists to the craziest parishes in town; I would put them in the front pews where the goofiest Mass ever was being “performed” – even if it was the only time in a century such a Mass had ever taken place. Let them be discouraged about their Church, and let those who don’t understand think they are whackos.

Like you, I don’t see rampant craziness at Mass – just the occasional eye-rolling-worthy statement or symbolism. But that isn’t how Satan strikes at me – he does it in many other ways.

I promise to pray for the good men and women who are burdened by inappropriateness in our Holy Liturgy; and hope they will pray for me, too.
This is a truly excellent explanation.
 
Cat, I have to admit, I’ve often wondered this myself. But it makes sense. If I were Satan and wanted to insert chaos into God’s Kingdom, I would strike at where each person’s treasure lies. I would lead devout Traditionalists to the craziest parishes in town; I would put them in the front pews where the goofiest Mass ever was being “performed” – even if it was the only time in a century such a Mass had ever taken place. Let them be discouraged about their Church, and let those who don’t understand think they are whackos.

Like you, I don’t see rampant craziness at Mass – just the occasional eye-rolling-worthy statement or symbolism. But that isn’t how Satan strikes at me – he does it in many other ways.

I promise to pray for the good men and women who are burdened by inappropriateness in our Holy Liturgy; and hope they will pray for me, too.
Remember it would probably go the other way too - if a non-trad wanted to experience the EF it wouldn’t surprise me if a lot of 'em were led to the coldest most unfriendly over-tizzed theatrical performance of a Mass where God seemed entirely secondary to the priest and servers making all the gestures and pronouncing all the words just so as if it were some kind of magic spell, were totally lost because of the Latin and the silent Canon etc etc.

One reason I’ve never been to a TLM, though I’ve seen several broadcast ones - I feel like I’d probably miss the point entirely in the midst of all the ephemera. And don’t tell me it couldn’t possibly happen, I know plenty of older relatives who were there pre-Vatican 2, who have always been extremely well educated and devout with it, and still would almost certainly not willingly choose to go to an EF.
 
Remember it would probably go the other way too - if a non-trad wanted to experience the EF it wouldn’t surprise me if a lot of 'em were led to the coldest most unfriendly over-tizzed theatrical performance of a Mass where God seemed entirely secondary to the priest and servers making all the gestures and pronouncing all the words just so as if it were some kind of magic spell, were totally lost because of the Latin and the silent Canon etc etc.
Absolutely. As someone who knew only the OF and has only been exposed to the EF over the past few years due to, first, friends who are quite devoted to it and, second, our parish beginning to offer it twice a month, if I only “tried” the TLM once, I would have never come back. As your basic hard-headed Irish, however, I keep coming back and, each time, find a greater depth of spirituality in the prayer experience that is the TLM. Unlike some on the board, I am not totally devoted to one or the other form – but Satan certainly tried his best to keep me away from the EF. Ironically, experiencing the EF has led me to seek out old missals and traditions which have greatly enriched my spiritual life – without taking away from my less traditional prayer expressions.

I LOVE HAVING SUCH A RICH FAITH HERITAGE IN OUR HOLY MOTHER CHURCH!!! 👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top