R
Ron_Conte
Guest
I note that several contrary opinions above are ‘ipse dixit’ arguments; they consist simply in a series of baseless assertions, with no support. In effect, the poster is saying this is true because I say it is true, and that is false because I say that it is false.
My position has support from the documents that I cite above. In addition:
Concerning marriages between two unbaptized persons, this is a true type of marriage, called merely natural marriage. The Sacrament of marriage is both a natural marriage and a Sacrament.
However, magisterial documents and Canon Law use ‘valid’ to refer only to the Sacrament of Marriage. If anyone hold a contrary opinion, cite a document that uses ‘valid’ to describe a merely natural marriage.
Catholics cannot have a valid marriage that is not a Sacrament:
“for Catholics, a valid marriage can only be one that is celebrated according to the laws of the Church.” ADDRESS OF JOHN PAUL II TO THE TRIBUNAL OF THE ROMAN ROTA 18 January 1990
§2. For this reason, a valid matrimonial contract cannot exist between the baptized without it being by that fact a sacrament.
Canon law uses the term valid marriage only for the Sacrament of marriage.
Familiaris Consortio uses the term valid marriage only for the Sacrament of marriage.
The citation above from apologist Jim Blackburn carries no weight of its own, since it is not a magisterial source, and it does not present an argument to show that merely natural marriages are called ‘valid’.
My position has support from the documents that I cite above. In addition:
Concerning marriages between two unbaptized persons, this is a true type of marriage, called merely natural marriage. The Sacrament of marriage is both a natural marriage and a Sacrament.
However, magisterial documents and Canon Law use ‘valid’ to refer only to the Sacrament of Marriage. If anyone hold a contrary opinion, cite a document that uses ‘valid’ to describe a merely natural marriage.
Catholics cannot have a valid marriage that is not a Sacrament:
“for Catholics, a valid marriage can only be one that is celebrated according to the laws of the Church.” ADDRESS OF JOHN PAUL II TO THE TRIBUNAL OF THE ROMAN ROTA 18 January 1990
§2. For this reason, a valid matrimonial contract cannot exist between the baptized without it being by that fact a sacrament.
Canon law uses the term valid marriage only for the Sacrament of marriage.
Familiaris Consortio uses the term valid marriage only for the Sacrament of marriage.
The citation above from apologist Jim Blackburn carries no weight of its own, since it is not a magisterial source, and it does not present an argument to show that merely natural marriages are called ‘valid’.