P
Publisher
Guest
I never knew the Society of Friends was considered “feel good”…I always felt the deep personal burden of seeking to conform myself to His will and seek a life of personal holiness through allowing my “life to speak” my beliefs before this world.Perhaps I didn’t phrase it correctly, it isn’t that they claim to be the actual church, but that they claim not to be a distinct group. The non-denominational claim is that they are base Christians, and an independent umbrella group. This claim is of course contradicted by the fact that they tend to be quite strict that everyone conform to the beliefs of their pastor (though not all non-denominational churches) and they are quite quick to kick people out (I know one individual who was kicked out of a non-denom church held in his own living room).
I suspect this is hard to describe to someone from a feelgood church such as the Quakers. My basic issue with them, however, is that they are baptists who claim to not be Baptists.
I have always feelt a deep responsibility to the community of faith of which I belong and a deep personal sense of service to “the least of these”…There certainly is joy…“joy unspeakable and full of glory”…but “feel good”??? I must be doing something wrong…never thought of the Society of Friends as “feel good” religion.
Something for me to ponder I guess.