Nathanael: an interpretation to the problem Jn 1:43-51 (corrected)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gloria_de_G
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Reading the above quote (post #26) I had the impression that posts 21, 22, & 32 made by po18guy Forum Elder, Prayer Warrior, Radio Club Member were dismissed out of hand.

It is good the material was studied. Forum Elder po18guy cited commentary taken from
Catena Aurea which is COMMENTARY ON THE FOUR GOSPELS, COLLECTED OUT OF THE WORKS OF THE FATHERS, BY ST. THOMAS AQUINAS.

I thought by saying, “I am not going to go one by one telling you where I do not believe they got it” you believed the writings of the likes of** St. Augustine or St John Chrysostom** were not germane or helpful to your interpretation of John 1:48.

mea culpa
Well, see, instead of trying to overpower me like this, go and see what I wrote for the answer to Nathanael problem** and then correct me from there** if you think I said some nonsense. As for the Fathers of the Church you do not know my love for Saint Augustine, I even can say that he is my spiritual director.

But not because of that I have to believe when the Fathers of the Church spoke of ‘antipodes’, they thought that the earth was flat.!!! In fact Saint Augustine did not believe in antipodes but said this:

“it is too absurd to say that some men might have set sail from this side and, traversing the immense expanse of ocean, have propagated there a race of human beings descended from that one first man.” i.e. Adam. (City of God XVI 9)

“This opinion of St. Augustine was commonly held until the progress of science, whilst confirming his main contention that the human race is one, dissipated the scruples arising from a defective knowledge of geography.” From www.newadvent.org

So please if you do not like my interpretation, which differs from that of the Fathers, with all respect due to them,** tell me where and point it out so that I can review myself**. Be fare and do not just try to overpower me like this, I may be new in the forums but I am not a youngster.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=843795

In the love of the mysterious ways in which the Holy Spirit work for our good,
Gloria

.
 
I do not understand your statement or your tone. I was replying in a nice manner to to the your question.

We were having a nice discussion on the topic with some interesting observations. But thank you for correcting me as well as the rest oft those who posted here, including the Forum Elder.
It had nothing to do with the fig tree; it had to do with the Holy Spirit.
My answer was related to this that you said…
May be, please you should excuse my English because is not my mother tongue, and what you answered I took it like saying that you were not interest in the argument because you did not add anything, you drop the statement and that was that…sorry for that. Like you said: mea culpa.

Gloria,

.
 
We can argue till the cows come home and speculate but you cannot say one is wrong and the other is right.We are all speculating on all the information available.When Phillip brought Nathaniel to Jesus he said here comes a honest man a true son of Israel.The name Israel was given for the first time to Jacob and that is the reason I inferred that Jesus could have in his divine power seen that Nathaniel was reading Scripture and perhaps the passage about Jacobs ladder.I must congratulate everyone for their excellent contributions and the attempt to Discern the mind of our Divine Saviour.God Bless You All
Well dear Anton we have been 2000 years or so talking about all this, isn’t beautiful!!

Do you know that I put forward my own interpretation of the passage, is here:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=843795

And if you have any objection, they are must welcome.

In the love of the Truth,
Gloria

.
 
You know Timothy, if you were right and as soon as Nathanael saw Jesus he realized that Jesus was the Messiah, just because some suggest that he was a scholar of the Hebrew Scriptures, then why to the Pharisees and the Sadducees and Scribes did not happen the same, they all were Hebrew Scholars as it were???

Not even Thomas, who was one of the 12 believed the others that Jesus has resurrected… not to mention that after Jesus’ death they even went back to fishing (Peter) like if nothing had happen…???

And do you want me to believe that Nathanael just like that believed in Jesus, just by seeing him??? Even before they saw miracles?? No, I do not take it, and if Nathanael was a Hebrew Scholar or not I do not know, and I believed no one knows, is a speculation to give an answer to the problem.

By the way I gave an interpretation here if you would like to see it, and if you have objections let me know. It is build only on the poor details that we have of the encounter and Jewish expectations for the messianic age.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=843795

In the love of Christ
Gloria,

.
The Sadducees only believed in the first five books of the Bible, the Torah. The Sadducees did not believe that anything the Prophets wrote was true.Jesus even rebukes them for their lack of belief in the resurrection of the dead citing their ignorance of scripture as one of the reasons for their incorrect doctrine.

But Jesus answered them, "You are wrong, because you know neither the scriptures nor the power of God. (Matthew 22:29)

Jesus rebukes the Pharisees and Sadducees for their inability to correctly interpret the Scriptures, their inability to see 'the sign of the times", their inability to see that the time for the Messiah had arrived.

And the Pharisees and Sad’ducees came, and to test him they asked him to show them a sign from heaven. He answered them, "When it is evening, you say, It will be fair weather; for the sky is red.' And in the morning, It will be stormy today, for the sky is red and threatening.’ You know how to interpret the appearance of the sky, but you cannot interpret the signs of the times. An evil and adulterous generation seeks for a sign, but no sign shall be given to it except the sign of Jonah." So he left them and departed. (Matthew 16:1-4)

Jesus rebukes the 'Jews" for not correctly understanding that the scriptures bear witness to him.

You search the scriptures, because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness to me; yet you refuse to come to me that you may have life. (John 5:39-40)

Many regular people however, knew that the messiah was to come.

Then went out to him Jerusalem and all Judea and all the region about the Jordan, and they were baptized by him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins. (Matthew 3:5-6)

All of Judea went out to John the Baptist. That was a region the size of a US state, and more people even from around the Jordan River. Everyone was preparing for the Messiah. The Scribes of the Law and Pharisees however, didn’t see it and so were not baptized.

When they heard this all the people and the tax collectors justified God, having been baptized with the baptism of John; but the Pharisees and the lawyers rejected the purpose of God for themselves, not having been baptized by him. (Luke 7:29-30)

No matter what the explanation, what is clear is that “under the fig tree” was a Jewish figure of speech for being a student of the Hebrew Scriptures. It was a rabbinical phrase, an idiom, to refer to someone who was a student of the Scriptures or someone who meditated on the Scriptures.

-Tim-
 
Under the fig tree” was a rabbinical idiom, a figure of speech. It was a phrase used by rabbis to refer to someone who was a student of the Scriptures or someone who meditated on the Scriptures.

Jesus was a rabbi. When he said that he saw Nathanial “under the fig” tree, it was a statement that he knew that Nathaniel was a student of the Scriptures.

When Jesus says that Nathanial has no guile, he is referring to Jacob in the Old Testament who took his brother’s blessing with guile.

**But he said, “Your brother came with guile, and he has taken away your blessing.” ** (Genesis 27:35)

-Tim-
 
Under the fig tree” was a rabbinical idiom, a figure of speech. It was a phrase used by rabbis to refer to someone who was a student of the Scriptures or someone who meditated on the Scriptures.
OK Timothy I am not going to take this anymore. Tell me the references about this rabbinical idiom in those days, to be used as a figure of speach and then I will start to believe you other wise I believe what I find in the Bible, Micha 4:3-4 which it was really a messianic ideal to be under the fig tree. I have Scripture that backs up my interpretation. Give me yours, because for me this is must important for the Jews of those days since they were all wondering when the Messiah will come.
Jesus was a rabbi. When he said that he saw Nathanial “under the fig” tree, it was a statement that he knew that Nathaniel was a student of the Scriptures.
And why Jesus should want to say that? What extraordinary thing was if Nathanael was a student of the Scriptures. I really do not see, if he was, every one knew about it, he was not a student in secret and will not have provoke the response that he gave to Jesus.

Look if you do not agree with my interpretation, why you do not object directly from what I said???

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=843795
When Jesus says that Nathanial has no guile, he is referring to Jacob in the Old Testament who took his brother’s blessing with guile.

***But he said, “Your brother came with guile, and he has taken away your blessing.” *** (Genesis 27:35)

-Tim-
I do not believe this free interpretation just like that. Just because the word guile is mention? Why? Did Philip had a brother and did not act like Jacob in some similar instance???

But see Timothy if you carry on saying things before I finished the investigation that I am making to answer in the other post I am going to take ages!!! :crying:

In the love of God,
Gloria

.
 
Notice that when Nathaniel’s brother Phillip calls him, he references scripture - Moses, the law and the Prophets. This is how we know that Philip and Nathaniel were students of the Scriptures.

*Philip found Nathan’a-el, and said to him, "We have found him of whom Moses in the law and also the prophets wrote, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph." (John 1:45) *

Jesus was a rabbi. Rabbis used several teaching techniques when teaching from the scriptures. One of the rabbinical techniques Jesus uses often is called remez. Remez is a teaching technique where a rabbi hints at a scripture verse to bring the mind of his audience not only to the verse he is hinting at but to the surrounding verses and themes they convey. That is what Jesus is doing when he uses the word guile, bringing his audiences mind to the story of Jacob and Esau. He is contrasting Jacob and Esau with Phillip and Nathaniel.

But he said, "Your brother came with guile, and he has taken away your blessing." (Genesis 39:35)

Jesus saw Nathan’a-el coming to him, and said of him, "Behold, an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile!" (John 1:47)


Jesus calls Nathaniel an Israelite - a son of Israel. Israel was Jacob and Esau’s father. It is a reference to Phillip and Nathaniel as sons of Israel and a comparison of them to Jacob and Esau. It is also a reference to Jacob’s ladder.

That is how the teaching technique of remez works. Jews would have understood rabbinical teaching this way. Nathanial even calls refers to Jesus as a rabbi in his response.

Nathan’a-el answered him, "Rabbi, you are the Son of God! You are the King of Israel!" (John 1:49)

People would often sit in the shade of the fig tree to study, meditate or converse. Fig trees have dense shade because they have big leaves. The fig tree is a theme which runs throughout scripture, from the very first verses. Adam and Eve eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil and then they know they are naked and they sew fig leaves on themselves. The fig tree references in the Bible are that - the knowledge of God’s law - the knowledge of good and evil.

Everyone will sit in the shade of his own fig tree - everyone will be a student of God’s word, will meditate on the God’s law, on God’s word, and on the teaching of God whimself who became flesh.

A priest at my parish mentioned that “under the fig tree” was an idiom for being a student of Scripture in a homily last year. Jeff Cavins mentions it in one of his Bible studies. Scott Hahn mentions it in the questions he developed for the Ignatius Catholic Study Bible. ignatius.com/promotions/catholic-study-bible/download/guides/icsb-john.pdf

-Tim-
 
Notice that when Nathaniel’s brother Phillip calls him, he references scripture - Moses, the law and the Prophets. This is how we know that Philip and Nathaniel were students of the Scriptures.
I do not think this is evidence of being students, people used to gather at the Synagogue to listen to the reading of the Scripture and explanations from the Rabbis. That did not make the people students of the Scriptures. And also we know that Jesus chose the little ones, if they were students they will be great, because not many people had the opportunity to study in those days, just the privileged ones, whom Jesus did not come to call. How about this one???
Philip found Nathan’a-el, and said to him, "We have found him of whom Moses in the law and also the prophets wrote, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph." (John 1:45)

Jesus was a rabbi. Rabbis used several teaching techniques when teaching from the scriptures. Remez is a teaching technique where a rabbi hints at a scripture verse to bring the mind of his audience not only to the verse he is hinting at but to the surrounding verses and themes therein. Jesus uses the rabbinical teaching technique of remez often. That is what Jesus is doing when he uses the word guile, bringing his audiences mind to the story of Jacob and Esau. He is contrasting Jacob and Esau with Phillip and Nathaniel.

But he said, "Your brother came with guile, and he has taken away your blessing." (Genesis 39:35)-Tim-
Give right the quote or I do not answer you!!! you also make a mistake in one you gave me of Micah. Be careful in your quotes please…

Gloria

.
 
I do not think this is evidence of being students, people used to gather at the Synagogue to listen to the reading of the Scripture and explanations from the Rabbis. That did not make the people students of the Scriptures. And also we know that Jesus chose the little ones, if they were students they will be great, because not many people had the opportunity to study in those days, just the privileged ones, whom Jesus did not come to call. How about this one???

Give right the quote or I do not answer you!!! you also make a mistake in one you gave me of Micah. Be careful in your quotes please…

Gloria

.
Sorry, it should have been Genesis 27:35 instead of 39:35. I don’t recall having quoted from the Book of the Prophet Micah.

For your reference - catholicnewsagency.com/saint.php?n=569

-Tim-
 
Notice that when Nathaniel’s brother Phillip calls him, he references scripture - Moses, the law and the Prophets. This is how we know that Philip and Nathaniel were students of the Scriptures.

Philip found Nathan’a-el, and said to him, "We have found him of whom Moses in the law and also the prophets wrote, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph." (John 1:45)
I do not think this is evidence of being students, people used to gather at the Synagogue to listen to the reading of the Scripture and explanations from the Rabbis. That did not make the people students of the Scriptures. And also we know that Jesus chose the little ones, if they were students they will be great, because not many people had the opportunity to study in those days, just the privileged ones, whom Jesus did not come to call. How about this one???
Jesus was a rabbi. Rabbis used several teaching techniques when teaching from the scriptures. One of the rabbinical techniques Jesus uses often is called remez. Remez is a teaching technique where a rabbi hints at a scripture verse to bring the mind of his audience not only to the verse he is hinting at but to the surrounding verses and themes they convey. That is what Jesus is doing when he uses the word guile, bringing his audiences mind to the story of Jacob and Esau. He is contrasting Jacob and Esau with Phillip and Nathaniel.

But he said, "Your brother came with guile, and he has taken away your blessing." (Genesis 39:35)

Jesus saw Nathan’a-el coming to him, and said of him, "Behold, an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile!" (John 1:47)

Jesus calls Nathaniel an Israelite - a son of Israel. Israel was Jacob and Esau’s father. It is a reference to Phillip and Nathaniel as sons of Israel and a comparison of them to Jacob and Esau. It is also a reference to Jacob’s ladder.

That is how the teaching technique of remez works. Jews would have understood rabbinical teaching this way. Nathanial even calls refers to Jesus as a rabbi in his response.

Nathan’a-el answered him, "Rabbi, you are the Son of God! You are the King of Israel!" (John 1:49)
**First **of all we do not know, as far as my understanding goes, that Philip was the brother of Nathanael. In fact the link you provided in the other post #44 says was his friend! (I believe he was his brother, why not!)

Second Sorry, but all this business about the techniques of preaching from the rabbis and trying to accommodate Jesus teaching there is nonsense. What , do you want to frame God??? I think you have swallowed too much preaching from theologians!!

Third You said that Jesus was making them recall Jacob’s ‘guile’ (מִרְמָה) attitude towards his brother when He spoke about Nathanael being an Israelite without ‘guile’ . Well if you were true, and immediately make him think in Jacob’s account, in that moment he will have recognized as the Son of God, seen the way he used Scripture, **but no **, he went and asked him: “How do you know me?”. So his statement is not related to this fix up about Jacob.
People would often sit in the shade of the fig tree to study, meditate or converse. Fig trees have dense shade because they have big leaves. The fig tree is a theme which runs throughout scripture, from the very first verses. Adam and Eve eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil and then they know they are naked and they sew fig leaves on themselves. The fig tree references in the Bible are that - the knowledge of God’s law - the knowledge of good and evil.

Everyone will sit in the shade of his own fig tree - everyone will be a student of God’s word, will meditate on the God’s law, on God’s word, and on the teaching of God himself who became flesh.
Sorry, but it will not be a great thing to say ‘I saw you under the fig tree’ to just state that he knew that he was a student of the Scriptures. Why you are not able to see what is important and what is not? If he was truly sitting under the fig tree and Jesus saw him from afar, not only you are denying the divinity of Jesus, because will not mean anything that he saw him. Any one could have seen him and not because of that was the Son of God.
A priest at my parish mentioned that “under the fig tree” was an idiom for being a student of Scripture in a homily last year. Jeff Cavins mentions it in one of his Bible studies. Scott Hahn mentions it in the questions he developed for the Ignatius Catholic Study Bible. ignatius.com/promotions/catholic-study-bible/download/guides/icsb-john.pdf-Tim-
And this link that you put here only gives questions not answers. And if you believe that to seat under a fig tree was an idiom for being a student of the Scripture just because these scholars that you mention said so, it does not make it neither true, give the reference to the Jewish tradition that states that please, other wise I do not take it. I believe that may be in the Talmud or other Jewish writings where could be stated, but I would like to know.

In the love of God,
Gloria
 
The History of the Fig in the Holy Land from Ancient Times to the Present Day by Asaph Goor
rbedrosian.com/Gardens/Goor_1965_Fig.pdf

Fig tree as the Knowledge of Good and Evil
jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0007_0_06440.html

From the Talmud and Hebraica by John Lightfoot
ccel.org/ccel/lightfoot/talmud.vii.ii.html

Understanding Matt 21:19, and Mark 11:14 (A Cursed Fig Tree)
jerusalemcouncil.org/tag/teshuvah/
*Understanding Yeshua cursing the fig tree requires one to read about Adam and Eve and the fig leaves they covered themselves with, and to understand how the Jewish idiom of “studying under the fig tree” means to study about the Messiah. *
-Tim-

betemunah.org/bethphag.html

shemayisrael.com/parsha/kahn/archives/pinchas71.htm

-Tim-
If one sees a fig tree in a dream, his learning will be preserved within him, as it says: Whoso keepeth the fig tree shall eat the fruit thereof. ( Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Berakoth, Folio 57a)halakhah.com/berakoth/berakoth_57.html
**R. Hiyya b. Abba in the name of R. Johanan expounded: With reference to the Scriptural text: Whoso keepeth the fig tree shall eat the fruit thereof, why were the words of the Torah compared to the ‘fig tree’? As with the fig tree the more one searches it the more figs one finds in it so it is with the words of the Torah; the more one studies them the more relish he finds in them. **(The Soncino Babylonian Talmud, Eruvin Book III 54a-54b)halakhah.com/rst/moed/13c%20-%20Eruvin%20-%2053a-79a.pdf

-Tim-
 
40.png
TimothyH:
If one sees a fig tree in a dream, his learning will be preserved within him, as it says: Whoso keepeth the fig tree shall eat the fruit thereof. ( Babylonian Talmud: Tractate Berakoth, Folio 57a)halakhah.com/berakoth/berakoth_57.html
Wow, this is great! I think it supports more my point: that Nathanael was dreaming (thinking) in the fig tree before Philip arrived. Many thanks for your contribution. And therefore the reason why he answered like that to Jesus when he told him that he saw him under the fig tree!
40.png
TimothyH:
***R. Hiyya b. Abba in the name of R. Johanan expounded: With reference to the Scriptural text: Whoso keepeth the fig tree shall eat the fruit thereof, why were the words of the Torah compared to the ‘fig tree’? As with the fig tree the more one searches it the more figs one finds in it so it is with the words of the Torah; the more one studies them the more relish he finds in them. ***(The Soncino Babylonian Talmud, Eruvin Book III 54a-54b)halakhah.com/rst/moed/13c%20-%20Eruvin%20-%2053a-79a.pdf

-Tim-
This quote is more to do with the curse of the fig tree that Jesus did. Nothing to be sitting under the fig tree.

Many thanks,
In the love of Christ and all the people that he inspires,
Gloria

.
The History of the Fig in the Holy Land from Ancient Times to the Present Day by Asaph Goor
rbedrosian.com/Gardens/Goor_1965_Fig.pdf

Fig tree as the Knowledge of Good and Evil
jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0007_0_06440.html

From the Talmud and Hebraica by John Lightfoot
ccel.org/ccel/lightfoot/talmud.vii.ii.html

Understanding Matt 21:19, and Mark 11:14 (A Cursed Fig Tree)
jerusalemcouncil.org/tag/teshuvah/
*Understanding Yeshua cursing the fig tree requires one to read about Adam and Eve and the fig leaves they covered themselves with, and to understand how the Jewish idiom of “studying under the fig tree” means to study about the Messiah. *
-Tim-
Dear Timothy, many, many thanks!! I read all the links in your posts (the other one also) and I most be becoming an expert in figs!!!😃

I like these ones that make my point of Nathanael thinking in the Messianic age:

" It is mentioned in the Bible 16 times together with the vine as the most important of the country’s fruit. The saying “every man under his vine and under his fig tree” depicts an era of peace and security in the past and the vision of an ideal future" (I Kings 5:5; Micah 4:4; cf. Joel 2:22)

A man who sees a fig in a dream will have
his learning preserved.
Why is the Torah
likened to a fig’? All the fruits have some-
thing uneatable in them-dates have stones,
grapes have their pips, and pomegranates
their rinds, but the fig is good to eat in its
entirety. So all the words of the Torah
have nothing worthless in them” (Yalkut
Shimoni, Yehoshua, 247).

“The more man searches in
it (the fig tree), the more figs he finds. Thus are the words
of the Torah, the more man studies them,
the more wisdom he finds in them” (Baby-
lonian Talmud, Erubin, 54a).

“They
would study the Torah under the fig tree and
the owner of the tree would get up early and
pick it over every day” (Jerusalem Tal-
mud, Berahot, Chapter 2).

And this last one which does not explain the event, because we know that Nathanael was not setting under a fig tree, if Jesus or Philip will have seen him under the fig tree, he will not have answer as he did: “Rabbi, You are the Son of God, the King of Israel.”

Many, many thanks for all these. And as I said, me interpreting as Messianic times sitting under the fig tree, but in a dream, just makes my point!!!

In the love of all the ones who teach the ignorance of others, (meaning my ignorance)
Gloria

.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top