I think you are supposed to come up with your own questions and comments. I think this thread (and others like it from 'Catholic Opinion) might be automatically generated rather than from a particular poster.I was at the conference, though I didn’t get to any of the plenums (working) except the last (sr. terista sp?)
Did you have some point or questions? I’d be happy to discuss them, as I have mixed feeling about the conference, but I wonder what you were getting at?
They are the ones in the seminary for the wrong reasons.Well, there were approximately 3500 attendees, not counting all the speakers, staff, exhibitors, etc. I think saying there is a “large variance of opinions and ideas” in any group like that is right on the money.
I went to the breakfast and was amused to hear Marty Haugen. He was relating a story where he described himself as an out of work musician, and his compainion shot back saying somethign liek “don’t sell yourself short, there are whole websites dedicated to hating you!”
I heard people who were vehemently mourning the thought of being “told what to do” by the USCCB as far as choosing and composing music. And I heard comments to the effect that “all the 20 year olds in the seminaries now want to go back to cassocks and berettas”. On the other hand I heard people praising the return to latin, and sung antiphons.
There was another thread about that around here. I’ll have to look for it. I didn’t attend but my liturgy/music director and his wife did attend. I haven’t spoken to him about it personally but he did put a little something in our bulleting last Sunday which pretty much just mentioned singing as a high form of prayer.Someone told me there was a national convention of liturgical musicians in Indianapolis recently. Anyone attend? Was it for Catholic liturgies? Hass, Haugen, etc. were some of the speakers supposedly. It sounded liked a mixed bag of traditional and contemporary music.
I was just curious about what it was and if it had a specific direction - introduce new music, try to clarify liturgical music guidelines from Rome and the USCCB (if there are any), educate musicians on what is and isn’t allowed (can’t substitute a song for a reading, for example - we’ve been known to do this…)Yes there is another thread about this started by catholic blogger i think. I was at the conference.
NPM is a national pastoral musicians organization founed by Fr. Virgil Funk. It is supposed to be a professional organization to further training and education in catholic church musicains, and provide some networking. They have local chapters all over, and have several regional and one national conference every year. There was something in the neighborhood of 4500 people at this one, and with that many people there is no way you could avoid having a mix of veiwpoints.
Was there something you’d like to ask?
The short answer is yes to all of the above, and more. There are opening events each day, and many “breakout sessions” which you could think of as workshops or classes on every topic imaginable. Handbells, directing large groups, small groups, cantoring, improving voice, how to have an effective practice, liturgical guidleines, etc, etc… the best thing would be to get a copy of a registration packet and read some of the descritions.I was just curious about what it was and if it had a specific direction - introduce new music, try to clarify liturgical music guidelines from Rome and the USCCB (if there are any), educate musicians on what is and isn’t allowed
This is the most presumptuous thing I have ever read on any forum on the entire internet.They are the ones in the seminary for the wrong reasons.