Neibuhr on Easygoing Christianity: non-Catholic variety

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rbt_Southwell
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

Rbt_Southwell

Guest
Some 40+ years ago, the theologian H. Richard Neibuhr wrote what he called the Creed of the mainstream * American Christian:

“A God without wrath brought men without sin into a kingdom without judgment through the ministrations of a Christ without a cross.”

What are your thoughts on his statement? Do you believe this to be a fair representation of non-denominational Christianity? Or do you think there are those in the Church who ascribe to Neibuhr’s view?*
 
Some 40+ years ago, the theologian H. Richard Neibuhr wrote what he called the Creed of the mainstream * American Christian:

“A God without wrath brought men without sin into a kingdom without judgment through the ministrations of a Christ without a cross.”

What are your thoughts on his statement? Do you believe this to be a fair representation of non-denominational Christianity? Or do you think there are those in the Church who ascribe to Neibuhr’s view?*

Niebuhr was not talking about nondenominational Christianity, which was much less prominent in his day and which he would have considered to be a strange fundamentalist fringe of Protestantism. Mainline Protestantism refers to the big, relatively liberal denominations belonging to older Protestant traditions such as Methodist, Presbyterian, etc.

I fear that some aspects of “megachurch” nondenominational evangelicalism are indeed heading in that direction, though.

Edwin
 
.
I fear that some aspects of “megachurch” nondenominational evangelicalism are indeed heading in that direction, though.

Edwin
He did say some very interesting things about denominations being (I am woefully paraphrasing and I promise to find the exact quotation) representations of religion to the caste system.

He (to me) was more of my style than his brother’s liberalism.

As to your “megachurch” comment: it’s interesting that many of them (in our neck of the woods at least) are called “worship centers.”

I guess this is to differentiate them from “sports centers” and “entertainment centers.”

Oh well, I am grateful to be Catholic and I am truly thankful for my backward thinking, stubborn against popular culture and mystery ladened, Spirit filled, Eucharist housed Church!

Robert
 
Some 40+ years ago, the theologian H. Richard Neibuhr wrote what he called the Creed of the mainstream * American Christian:

“A God without wrath brought men without sin into a kingdom without judgment through the ministrations of a Christ without a cross.”

What are your thoughts on his statement?*

Yes.

This is the epitome of what I would call “goat Christianity.”
Do you believe this to be a fair representation of non-denominational Christianity?
 
Atemi;

what exactly is “goat christianity?”

And isn’t it interesting how so many ministers speak of ‘issues’ instead of ‘sins?’

Robert
 
Atemi;

what exactly is “goat christianity?”
Exactly what you posted:

“A God without wrath brought men without sin into a kingdom without judgment through the ministrations of a Christ without a cross.”
And isn’t it interesting how so many ministers speak of ‘issues’ instead of ‘sins?’
Yes.

I have heard many a priest speak like this too.

I guess we all need to get back to basics.

 
You’re correct. Regardless of tradition, many ministers, rabbis and priests speak like Dr Phil and Oprah and Faith Popcorn on matters religious.

Is it the creeping culturalization of Christianity? When there is no yardstick to keep the faithful on track, everyone talks to an angel and gets gold tablets (or a personal vision or avatar or ‘spirit guide’ or ‘gospel of wealth’ message).

We Catholics (well, those of us who like the ‘reminders’ of our faith: the sacramentals, the incense, the votive candles, the novenas, the Stations of the Cross) have many ways to incorporate the Gospel message into the rhythms of our daily lives.

Neibuhr was quite a bit ahead of his time in noticing how mainstream Protestantism was veering towards the clubbiness and social caste havens of the middle class.

I guess this is why Pentacostalism and Evangelicalism have been so successful in our society.

Robert
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top