What is it about this particular subject that brings out such strong negative feelings??
There’s a lot to it, and I guess I might be able to list a few things since I used to be on one side of the argument and am now on the other.
From the OF point of view the SSPX are/were:
Use arguments that don’t hold water to justify their existence
Disobedient
Leadership (was) excommunicated
Proud
Arrogant
Loud-mouthed
Anachronistic/outdated
Unwilling to submit to legitimate authority
Unwilling to accept new dogmas of Vatican II
Schismatic
Practitioners of a rite that had been abrogated
Like Luther, breaking away to make their own church
A cult
Continue to provide illicit/invalid sacraments to date
From the SSPX point of view:
Deny most everything in the list above and have attempted to prove it
Unfairly dealt with by JPII and Rome
Feel Vatican II is problematic and contend that no new dogma was pronounced
Maligned/misrepresented by Catholic hierarchy to the faithful at large
Dealt with uncharitably by ‘mainstream’ Catholicism at large while heretics and non-Catholics were treated warmly
Weren’t given a fair hearing
Mocked for their arguments even when they were right (TLM not abrogated, no schism etc.)
Rely on “supplied jurisdiction” for administering the sacraments.
All I’m gonna say is that I’m glad they are having their doctrinal talks with Rome now. Deo Gratias.