If I connect the dots between the 7 cities in the book of Revelation, it kind of looks like Utah upside-down. AMAZING.Modern technology has provided yet another piece of compelling evidence that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is indeed the Messenger of Allah.
That’s a much more impressive example.Those guys in South America during the Stone Age made giant animal pictures that can only be seen from the air, yet they are perfect.
I did not know that Muslims had the same fallicy as Westerners: those who lived in more primitive times were less intellegent than we are today.
Thanks.That’s a much more impressive example.
I guess we should all believe in Quetzelcoatl.
Yes, we all see what we want to see. Some Muslims have said it’s a miracle that the name allah appeared in the waves of the Tsunami several years ago. But a non-Muslim sees a boot kicking a dolphin in the same image. (The over-18 designation for this video is due to the tree that looks like it’s “giving the bird”):Thanks.
It is amazing to me the legnths that Muslims will go to to find outside verification of their faith. If they want to follow Islam, fine. If I say that it is not convencing to me, so be it. But if the faith and its fruits are not convencing, don’t insult me by trying to show how a bee hive spells Allah or the word Muhammed is in a cloud formation as proof.
Where is it stated in the Qur’an that we cannot leave the zone of the earth?… But, not only is something like this not unique, the most conclusive evidence that this is not a message from allah, is that allah said you can’t leave the zone of the earth. So, why would he have sent a message that can only be seen outside the “zone of the earth”?![]()
It’s in the video:Where is it stated in the Qur’an that we cannot leave the zone of the earth?
I suppose that is compelling evidence for Mr. Smith and his revelationIf I connect the dots between the 7 cities in the book of Revelation, it kind of looks like Utah upside-down. AMAZING.
Why not?That’s a much more impressive example.
I guess we should all believe in Quetzelcoatl.
Quetzalcoatl was a feathered serpent god of the Aztecs. This is not Christ by a “different name” by any stretch of the imagination.Why not?
Christ by a different name would still be Christ.
The stories of Q have many parallels to Christ. I find it fascinating, but than again I do believe that he visited his lost sheep and that his visit would not be wholly forgotten through the years.Quetzalcoatl was a feathered serpent god of the Aztecs. This is not Christ by a “different name” by any stretch of the imagination.
Jesus was not and never has been a feathered serpent.The stories of Q have many parallels to Christ. I find it fascinating, but than again I do believe that he visited his lost sheep and that his visit would not be wholly forgotten through the years.
ah but serpents are known for wisdom and feathers are a symbol of power.Jesus was not and never has been a feathered serpent.
From the Disillusioned Mormon blog:
mormonskeptic.blogspot.com/2007/06/who-was-quetzalcoatl.html
now come on, man.ah but serpents are known for wisdom and feathers are a symbol of power.
Wisdom and Power a simple yet usable reference for Christ for he had both in great abundance.