NFP: Grave reason

  • Thread starter Thread starter polycat
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

polycat

Guest
I know a couple needs grave reason to avoid having children even using NFP. This still leaves a lot of room for debate on what is a grave reason. What should a couple do that disagree greatly on whether a particular reason is grave enough to postpone having children? For instance, many people (including priests) advise newlyweds to avoid having children for a time after marriage to get use to each other. A couple could easily disagree on this. Would it be a sin for the person who thought it was not a grave enough reason to give in to the other? Thanks.
 
Both parties need to be seeking God’s will in this. When there is a disareement, this often is at the haaert of the matter. Often; as sometimes it is fear or misinformation, rather than a deliberate (or semi deliberate) attempt to avoid the question of what is God’s will.

You sound a bit upset - the term grave means serious. It is possible for people to emphasize the word grave to the point where we dind sin in any thought that we might not have a child “every rainy Tuesday”.

Note, I am not dispariging couples with large families, but they are susceptible to a “holier than thou” attitude towards those who don’t have large families.

And as to the issue of putting off children while the spouses “get to know each other”, evidence seems to the contrary, that those who have children soon are often in better marriages than those who delay.

The reason, I once heard was somewhat as follows: You have had that fight that was devastating; to cool off and get some space, you get in the car and drive off. If there is a child back home, you are much more likely to return, due to not only the responsiblity of that child, but the love bond you have formed (How could I live without seeing {enter name}?), than if there is only the spouse back there with whom you have had the fight.
When, and how many children to have is at best a difficult question. You need to ask your spouse a lot of questions (not argumentative, but probing), and you both need to have a serious discussion - or several. And if you can’t do it on your own, get professional help. Questions that run this deep need to come to resolution; better that the resolution is one that leads to closer committment, rather than the first step towards the ending of the marriage, or a long marriage which amounts to mere tolerance.
 
The standard the Church requires is not “grave reason”.

The Catechism terms it “just” reason and Humanae Vitae “well-grounded”.

“Grave” is a much higher standard than “just”. The CCC is clear regarding the motive, and that it not be selfish. But, there is no specific criteria and the couple should discern it prayerfully together.

I think that if the two spouses do not agree, you should err on the side of the one who feels a need to postpone until such time as they change their mind. Bringing a child into a situation where one does not feel ready and the other does can bring an element of resentment, a level of stress, or a feeling of betrayal into the relationship. BAD idea.

No, I do not think the second spouse is sinning.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top