Hello. I know this is an old thread, but I stumbled across it today via Google, and I wanted to make sure that none of you confuse real atheism with what you have found at WWGHA.
First, let me say that I like what one of you said earlier:
The question is whether Catholic miracles are only slightly more sophisticated versions of the psychsomatic effects seized on by Pentecostal type people. So the atheist has actually a real argument - if Catholic healings are miracles, we wouldn’t necessarily expect that physically possible healings would be favoured. However they are. Regeneration of amputated limbs is rare or unheard of, relief of cancer or paralysis fairly common.
That is a very solid way of approaching this argument: acknowledging that many “healings” aren’t healings at all. They are simply coincidental or the effect of placebo that is triggered by prayer, group hypnosis, etc. So thank you for that.
Defining “miracle” is a great way to approach this question, because it undermines it to begin with. If we declassify the “media” version of miracles, then it invalidates this question because amputees are no longer singled out. Suddenly, millions of people are praying for an answer to their problems, and those problems work themselves out naturally…not because of miraculous intervention.
So, if the Christian god does not help with every day problems…if he doesn’t answer prayers…then why do people believe? I think you’ll find that people don’t believe in a god because there’s evidence of a god. They believe because it feels nice. They like being able to attribute things to a cause without having to spend too much time thinking about it. Most importantly, they like being able to shirk their responsibilities to humanity.
One of my most hated phrases is, “I’ll keep you in my prayers.” I’m sorry, but how does that help anyone? If you told me that you had cancer, how would you feel if I answered with, “I’ll close my eyes and make a wish that you’ll be okay.” You’d probably get angry. Why don’t I offer instead to drive you to/from your chemo treatments? Bring your spouse and children dinner when you aren’t feeling up to cooking? Start a donation drive to help cover your medical bills so that you might be able to stave off bankruptcy for a few more weeks? Of all the things I could do, prayer (wishing) is the least helpful. But I see this all the time, and it drives me crazy.
I come from a Christian family. My sister owns an organization that operates an orphanage in Sierra Leone, West Africa. I’m often told, “Pray for little XXXX…he/she doesn’t have long to live…” But I actually have skills that can help that child survive, and I’m not allowed to help because I’m not a theist. (But they still ask me to wish for them.)
And that’s the problem with prayer. God doesn’t heal people (anyone…not just amputees) because he doesn’t answer wishes. It’s recorded that he will do “whatever we ask for in his name”. And that statement, though obvious in intent, gets rationalized down to “you stay sick or handicapped because it’s part of God’s plan.” But the truth is that wishes aren’t answered because there’s no one there to answer.
There is no god.
Some people find this to be difficult to accept, but it is actually a liberating concept. Instead of following the command of your imaginary friend, you can be compassionate to everyone. Help anyone. You don’t have to harm or condemn. No one is in danger of Hell. You do what’s right because YOU choose to. Because that’s who you are, and not because that’s who you’re told to be.
Being godless is about taking responsibility for our lives and the lives of others. Everyone should step up to atheism. And that’s the purpose of the WWGHA site. It delivers the message in a radical (and sometimes ridiculous) way, but the message is clear.
Thank you for allowing me to share.