No blessing for Catholic

  • Thread starter Thread starter yinekka
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Y

yinekka

Guest
My Catholic daughter and her Greek Orthodox husband took their baby to the Greek Orthodox church after the 40 days. The priest wouldn’t give my daughter a blessing when he found that she was a Catholic. As my son said," a Catholic priest would have happily given her Greek Orthodox husband a blessing."
 
My Catholic daughter and her Greek Orthodox husband took their baby to the Greek Orthodox church after the 40 days. The priest wouldn’t give my daughter a blessing when he found that she was a Catholic. As my son said," a Catholic priest would have happily given her Greek Orthodox husband a blessing."
As a Catholic priest, my actions are governed by Catholic universal law as well as by diocesan particular law, promulgated by my own bishop. The Orthodox priest, on the other hand, is to follow the law and the norms of his Church and of his bishop, which govern him.

I have the prerogative afforded me, to the extent that law allows, to impart blessings and to confer sacramentals on those who are not Catholic, at my discretion.
 
My Catholic daughter and her Greek Orthodox husband took their baby to the Greek Orthodox church after the 40 days. The priest wouldn’t give my daughter a blessing when he found that she was a Catholic. As my son said," a Catholic priest would have happily given her Greek Orthodox husband a blessing."
I’m not sure what to say. I know many Orthodox priests who happily give blessings to non-Orthodox. I’ve even had a handful of Orthodox bishops give me blessings. None of them, however, were Greek Orthodox. Perhaps it is something in their Greek Orthodox rules/norms that don’t allow for that. I’m sorry to hear about your daughter’s experience.
 
Were they trying to have the child churched? Was this in the context of a Divine Liturgy?
 
My Catholic daughter and her Greek Orthodox husband took their baby to the Greek Orthodox church after the 40 days. The priest wouldn’t give my daughter a blessing when he found that she was a Catholic. As my son said," a Catholic priest would have happily given her Greek Orthodox husband a blessing."
Some of the prayers in the 40-day Churching ceremony refer to restoring the woman to Communion and making her worthy to receive the Body and Blood of Christ. Since your daughter cannot receive Holy Communion in the Orthodox Church, I would imagine that is why she could not be Churched along with the baby.
 
Some of the prayers in the 40-day Churching ceremony refer to restoring the woman to Communion and making her worthy to receive the Body and Blood of Christ. Since your daughter cannot receive Holy Communion in the Orthodox Church, I would imagine that is why she could not be Churched along with the baby.
Just to add a bit of clarity to my response here: The Churching is a ceremony about the return of an Orthodox mother to the Church, after her absence due to childbirth. She she is not Orthodox, she is not returning to the Church after an absence.
 
Some of the prayers in the 40-day Churching ceremony refer to restoring the woman to Communion and making her worthy to receive the Body and Blood of Christ. Since your daughter cannot receive Holy Communion in the Orthodox Church, I would imagine that is why she could not be Churched along with the baby.
Good catch - I assumed blessing in the original post meant a standard blessing from the priest. I wasn’t thinking that the original post might be referring to something else.
 
My Catholic daughter and her Greek Orthodox husband took their baby to the Greek Orthodox church after the 40 days. The priest wouldn’t give my daughter a blessing when he found that she was a Catholic. As my son said," a Catholic priest would have happily given her Greek Orthodox husband a blessing."
I often get irritated when people of other faiths look for reasons to criticize the actions of priests of the Catholic Church when they refuse to do what these people want done. So, I will give this Greek Orthodox priest the right to do what he thinks is best.
 
This is typical behavior of the Greeks and, more commonly, of the Russian. Frankly, it is little more than instigative. The entire idea proceeds from an idea that the individual requesting a blessing is a schismatic and [potentially] questionably not baptized. Ask the Oriental Orthodox with a much more reasonable ecclesiology/mystagogy and they would never refuse.

I’m curious to the point of this thread, though. Are we to discuss if this is commonplace or official Orthodox policy or whether it is theologically correct or …?
 
This is typical behavior of the Greeks and, more commonly, of the Russian. Frankly, it is little more than instigative. The entire idea proceeds from an idea that the individual requesting a blessing is a schismatic and [potentially] questionably not baptized. Ask the Oriental Orthodox with a much more reasonable ecclesiology/mystagogy and they would never refuse.

I’m curious to the point of this thread, though. Are we to discuss if this is commonplace or official Orthodox policy or whether it is theologically correct or …?
If she so much as stood with the rest of the congregation for a divine liturgy she’d be blessed multiple times by the priest. I’ve never met an Orthodox priest that would outright refuse to give the ol’ “Father Son and Holy Spirit” over anyone, let alone the Catholic spouse of one of his parishioners. That leads me to believe, as others noticed, that she may not have been allowed to be directly involved in certain blessings having to do with the “churching” of the mother, since she isn’t Orthodox and therefore they wouldn’t apply to her. Greeks are hardly stickers for the rules in my experience, nor would a Greek Orthodox priest in the US be unfamiliar with mixed Orthodox/Catholic marriages or unaware of pastoral sensitivity.
 
^ A good portion of my family is Greek Orthodox. I have been refused a blessing from the priest even after the relation was known. Conversely, I know the Syriac Orthodox patriarch, as well as several bishops and many priests, none of which have ever denied me a blessing or even the sacraments.
 
In part, this discrepancy is based on different definitions of ecclesiology. The Syriac Churches have a very strong emphasis on Eucharistic ecclesiology. The Syriac Orthodox will gladly commune Maronites and, if asked, they’ll say we’re part of the same Church despite current historical and hierarchal issues. In this way, it would be a problem if they recognize being in the same Church yet refuse a blessing.

Conversely, I presume to the Eastern Orthodox anyone else is a schismatic and therefore not in the Church.
 
Some of the prayers in the 40-day Churching ceremony refer to restoring the woman to Communion and making her worthy to receive the Body and Blood of Christ. Since your daughter cannot receive Holy Communion in the Orthodox Church, I would imagine that is why she could not be Churched along with the baby.
Makes perfect sense. I mean a Catholic priest wouldn’t give a known non-Catholic communion. Another church acting in a similar manner in a Eucharistically related blessing cannot be seen as odd in that context.
 
Not quite sure about that as an absolute. Customs and “traditions” could be erroneous, and if one realizes they’re objectable the individual is morally compelled to actually contradict the custom. In fact, the great (generally liturgical) reformers of Churches, both Catholic and Orthodox, are such because they go against abuses which have become standard and to which others who commit them have become calloused or even unaware. I seriously question the Eastern Orthodox on their conceptions of ecclesiology regarding the other Apostolic Churches. If Maronites refused to church Antiochian Orthodox mothers we’d be turning away a lot of people.

And @Padres1969, that is untrue. A Catholic priest would consume a “known non-Catholic” - case in point: Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Church of the East and even (this is where I become uncomfortable) Protestants in danger of death without the ability to approach their own ministers.
 
And @Padres1969, that is untrue. A Catholic priest would consume a “known non-Catholic” - case in point: Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Church of the East and even (this is where I become uncomfortable) Protestants in danger of death without the ability to approach their own ministers.
Some of those yes, but as you say only in danger of death. Plus it’s well known the Orthodox are even stricter on their Eucharistic rules than the Catholic Church is about them.
 
Some of those yes, but as you say only in danger of death. Plus it’s well known the Orthodox are even stricter on their Eucharistic rules than the Catholic Church is about them.
Members of the Orthodox Churches and of the Church of the East need not be in danger of death in order to receive Holy Communion in the Catholic Church.
 
Some of those yes, but as you say only in danger of death. Plus it’s well known the Orthodox are even stricter on their Eucharistic rules than the Catholic Church is about them.
As RyanBlack said, Orthodox and the Church of the East members needn’t be in risk of death. Additionally, Eastern Orthodox might be stricter than Catholics, but Armenians and Syriacs are broadly much more willing to commune someone if they know they’re Catholic than the random Catholic priest communing an Orthodox individual.
 
As RyanBlack said, Orthodox and the Church of the East members needn’t be in risk of death. Additionally, Eastern Orthodox might be stricter than Catholics, but Armenians and Syriacs are broadly much more willing to commune someone if they know they’re Catholic than the random Catholic priest communing an Orthodox individual.
I have no experience with the Syriac Orthodox, but I have received Holy Communion from an Armenian Apostolic priest who knew that I am Catholic.
 
And @Padres1969, that is untrue. A Catholic priest would consume a “known non-Catholic” - case in point: Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Church of the East and even (this is where I become uncomfortable) Protestants in danger of death without the ability to approach their own ministers.
I trust that you meant to use some other verb than “consume”…I am, after all, a priest and not a cannibal. I don’t consume people…be they Catholic or non-Catholic :yup:

I think it is worth, just for the sake of completeness, quoting the canon because the vagueness leaves me uncomfortable.

In the former case, the grant is actually broader.

In the latter case, the grant is qualified and much more nuanced and should not be said, simply, as “Protestants in danger of death without the ability to approach their own ministers.” It has been my experience that diocesan bishops and the conferences of bishops have been very good, thankfully, at taking up this latter provision and guiding pastoral agents with elucidating guidelines and assistance.
*Can. 844 §1 Catholic ministers may lawfully administer the sacraments only to Catholic members of Christ’s faithful, who equally may lawfully receive them only from Catholic ministers, except as provided in §§2, 3 and 4 of this canon and in can. 861 §2.

§2 Whenever necessity requires or a genuine spiritual advantage commends it, and provided the danger of error or indifferentism is avoided, Christ’s faithful for whom it is physically or morally impossible to approach a Catholic minister, may lawfully receive the sacraments of penance, the Eucharist and anointing of the sick from non-Catholic ministers in whose Churches these sacraments are valid.

§3 Catholic ministers may lawfully administer the sacraments of penance, the Eucharist and anointing of the sick to members of the eastern Churches not in full communion with the Catholic Church, if they spontaneously ask for them and are properly disposed. The same applies to members of other Churches which the Apostolic See judges to be in the same position as the aforesaid eastern Churches so far as the sacraments are concerned.

§4 If there is a danger of death or if, in the judgement of the diocesan Bishop or of the Episcopal Conference, there is some other grave and pressing need, Catholic ministers may lawfully administer these same sacraments to other Christians not in full communion with the Catholic Church, who cannot approach a minister of their own community and who spontaneously ask for them, provided that they demonstrate the Catholic faith in respect of these sacraments and are properly disposed.

§5 In respect of the cases dealt with in §§2, 3 and 4, the diocesan Bishop or the Episcopal Conference is not to issue general norms except after consultation with the competent authority, at least at the local level, of the non-Catholic Church or community concerned. *
 
Why is everyone seemingly trying to push the boundaries in regard to which church will commune them? How often does the need arise here in the West? As an Antiochian Orthodox Christian in the US I’ve never gone so long or been in a position where I could not recieve communion for so long a period that I looked to other churches. I mean apparently one guy here knows the Syriac Partriarch personally, which is great, but what’s that got to do with the price of tea in China? Most Sundays I go to the same Church as always, and if I travel I look for an Orthodox Church and attend if I can. Most times I don’t bother to try and commune if travelling, I just go to church. I suppose I could try to commune, or just wait until next week, or maybe I’m not even prepared to do so. I’m trying to figure out how you get an Orthodox priest to deny you a blessing. I mean, the traditional greeting is “Father, bless” and he makes the sign of the cross and puts his hand out for you to kiss. I’ve never met a priest who said, “wait, are you Orthodox? Orthodox in communion with the Greek Patriarch of Antioch?” They just do it. What kind of blessing could one be looking for and what extraneous info could one be giving to be denied it? “Father bless, oh and I’m Maronite and buddies with the Syriac Orthodox Patriarch”???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top