K
KathieAnn
Guest
Please tell me how I can respond to a Protestant who insists that the Catholic Church claims certain early fathers were popes who never were simply to make the case of apostolic succession. Here is a bit of our conversation starting with my comment:
And ordination of every priest can be
Thanks!
And ordination of every priest can be
traced back to one of the apostles. FACT. By the way, you also said that some
that the Church considered popes were not. Who were these?
I have a popeThe term pope did not appear until Leo the Great in the mid 400’s. I know the apologist response to this (as I have heard all of the apologist responses you have given me to the other facts I have shown you). However, the historical fact is that there was no such thing as a pope before the mid 400’s.
chart which lists all the popes by name, birth, year of election and death.
Now I know they didn’t have to called “pope” to be in apostolic succession but where are Protestants getting this idea that we invented our line of succession prior to mid 400’s? What “history” is he referring to? Are there historical documents prior to 400 or so that list our popes that are reliable? We have argued for a long time on many different topics, and he always claims to know history better than me and that the Catholic version of history is made up. Help!Of course you do. The Roman Catholic church retroactively uses the term pope for certain early church fathers. That does not make it historically accurate. Study some history. Next to the Bible, history is probably the best argument against the Roman Catholic church.
End of our discussion and back to me here:
Thanks!