I am discussing Noah with someone else who believes that the flood is an example of genocide. so of coarse there are several problems here. thus far I seem to be stuck.
Judging the morality of God’s acts is tricky. A lot of things that are okay for God to do are not okay for us to do.
Genocide is bad for us, but it’s not exactly the same thing with God. God gave those people their lives and their existence, and technically he can take that away if he wants, for any reason, or none at all, although for the most part he doesn’t, because he gave us existence so that we could enjoy him.
But it doesn’t have to be that technical. The Bible says that every inclination of man’s heart was evil 24/7 back then, so I guess it was past the point of cajoling the world back into shaping up, and it would be more efficient to just pick the best and toss the rest, which is what he did. In other words, there really was no hope for change.
Also you can look at it this way. How bad is death anyways? After you die, you are judged by a fair and merciful God and then you go to heaven or hell, and even then, you are there basically by your own choice. Would you rather spend the rest of eternity in heaven if you can get there, or spend another 900 years in this life (because that’s how old they used to live to) living in a world full of people bent on evil 24/7?
So in a way it’s kind of relative, and personally I think God handled the situation in the best way possible, quickly sending everybody into eternity and starting over with one family.