What are we to make of Catholic schools that have a majority of non-Catholic teachers?
At the Catholic school my son attended before we began homeschooling, it wasn’t until 5th grade that he had a Catholic homeroom teacher. They were, for the most part, excellent teachers, and they “went through the motions” of basic Catholicism (prayers, school Mass attendance, and so on). I would add that, at this particular school, it is never, ever spoken of whether someone is Catholic or not, whether teacher or student (there are a handful of exceptions). One gets the impression that it is a taboo subject, “the elephant in the parlor” for those who would actually think about something like this. The majority of the teachers are not Catholic, and a sizable minority of students (about 30 percent) are not Catholic either. The catechetics were standard diocesan issue (Sadlier, if I recall correctly) but I did find that when we began homeschooling, my son had huge gaps in his religious knowledge, gaps that we are filling in with the Baltimore Catechism.
I realize that in a vastly majority non-Catholic region, such as where we live, it is going to be very difficult to hire only Catholic teachers across the board. In the higher grades, I have no serious objections to having non-Catholics teaching subjects where there is little or no faith content (math, physical sciences, music, physical education — Knute Rockne started out as a Lutheran — and so on). But where subjects have some Catholic dimension to them, it seems to me that only a Catholic teacher, who actually believes in what he or she is teaching, can impart that Catholic dimension.
When I was in Catholic school, the non-Catholic teachers (a small minority) and non-Catholic students (ditto) might as well have had a sign hung around their necks saying “I’m not Catholic”. They didn’t, of course, and no one felt badly towards them, but it was just common knowledge and was seen as the exception. A non-Catholic would definitely not have been tasked with teaching religion.
Thoughts from the forum?
At the Catholic school my son attended before we began homeschooling, it wasn’t until 5th grade that he had a Catholic homeroom teacher. They were, for the most part, excellent teachers, and they “went through the motions” of basic Catholicism (prayers, school Mass attendance, and so on). I would add that, at this particular school, it is never, ever spoken of whether someone is Catholic or not, whether teacher or student (there are a handful of exceptions). One gets the impression that it is a taboo subject, “the elephant in the parlor” for those who would actually think about something like this. The majority of the teachers are not Catholic, and a sizable minority of students (about 30 percent) are not Catholic either. The catechetics were standard diocesan issue (Sadlier, if I recall correctly) but I did find that when we began homeschooling, my son had huge gaps in his religious knowledge, gaps that we are filling in with the Baltimore Catechism.
I realize that in a vastly majority non-Catholic region, such as where we live, it is going to be very difficult to hire only Catholic teachers across the board. In the higher grades, I have no serious objections to having non-Catholics teaching subjects where there is little or no faith content (math, physical sciences, music, physical education — Knute Rockne started out as a Lutheran — and so on). But where subjects have some Catholic dimension to them, it seems to me that only a Catholic teacher, who actually believes in what he or she is teaching, can impart that Catholic dimension.
When I was in Catholic school, the non-Catholic teachers (a small minority) and non-Catholic students (ditto) might as well have had a sign hung around their necks saying “I’m not Catholic”. They didn’t, of course, and no one felt badly towards them, but it was just common knowledge and was seen as the exception. A non-Catholic would definitely not have been tasked with teaching religion.
Thoughts from the forum?
Last edited: