E
EasterJoy
Guest
Exactly. It is enough that the spouse suffering abuse or infidelity deserves to escape the harm. The spouse does not have the right nor does the spouse need to decide if the offending spouse is at fault or not. That the infidelity or danger is real is sufficient; the spouse does not have to judge guilt, but can leave that up to God.No, the fact that the abuse stems from an illness does not mean you have to just sit tight and endure it. You should do what you can to help your spouse deal with their sickness but that does not mean continuing to live with them and accepting their abuse. In fact, often doing this only ends up enabling the abusing spouse which does the exact opposite of actually help them. And sometimes, there really is nothing you can do but pray for them from a safe distance.
What the Church has to say about when a married couple may morally separate.
vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__P45.HTM
There are no exceptions for the spouse causing mental or physical danger or even simply making common life too difficult being sick. If such harm is occurring to either the spouse or the children then there is a legitimate reason for the spouses to separate. This is true even if the marriage is clearly valid. Do not believe the lie that since your spouse’s behaviour stems from an illness you are obliged to suffer abuse. That is not at all Catholic teaching on the matter.
A tribunal can investigate whether the capacity for a lifelong marriage existed, however. If a person made a promise in good faith but in the end did not prove to have the capacity to do what was promised, then that attempt at marriage was not valid, even if that spouse had a capacity to fulfill marriage vows for a limited time or under narrow circumstances.