OKay..lets get busy! Who do we evangelize first?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Armor_of_Light
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Armor_of_Light

Guest
I’m thinking we should evangelize catholics first, to boost our numbers before evangelizing anyone else.

Also…Since there is such confusion (for some) regarding:

‘no salvation outside the church’
inability to call non-catholics ‘heretics’
‘subsists in’
true ecumenism
fraternal correction
the ‘militant’ of Church Militant
etc…

Seriously. Why would anyone want to convert? Its a tough sell if the Church is not necessary for salvation. The argument from authority, i/e Jesus told us to, only goes so far.

Discuss and please don’t read stuff into this OP. I stated things as clearly as possible with no ulterior motives.
 
I say we evangelize Catholics first. Pope Francis has shown that, in order for our evangelization to bear fruit, we need to “walk the walk” ourselves, and be living, visible witnesses for what we are proclaiming.

I believe that all of our recent Pope’s have done this , and that Pope Francis is highlighting it. We have to let our light shine.
 
We evangelize ourselves, as individuals, first.

Others are converted by witnessing one’s own ongoing conversion. Conversion is a life-long process that requires constant attention until we die.

If we think that someone elses conversion is a higher priority than our own, then we are more concerned with the speck in our neighbour’s eye than the log in our own, and the battle is lost: we will likely only turn off the person we are trying to convert. That isn’t evangelizing, it’s proselytizing.

And that applies equally to fellow Catholics whom we perceive to have a flawed view of what we perceive as “truth”.
 
I think we should take the opportunity to evangelize anyone we can regarding our need for a savior wherever/whenever we can do so.

Then the dialogue is open for discussion of a deeper profession of Faith in a denomination
such as the Catholic Church.
 
The word evangelize is confusing my thoughts on this. Isn’t the purpose of evangelization to convert? If that is the case then a Catholic would seek out a non-Catholic for this purpose. I do like the thoughts the previous posters expressed though.
 
We should work on evangelizing ourselves first so that we may be the “city on a hill” - a light to others.
 
Whenever your going to fix things we must always fix within our own home first. As we become better Catholics and learn our faith better, we can then teach others, and others will come in bc well be able to show them the richness and truthfulness of the church
 
The word evangelize is confusing my thoughts on this. Isn’t the purpose of evangelization to convert? If that is the case then a Catholic would seek out a non-Catholic for this purpose. I do like the thoughts the previous posters expressed though.
The thing is, we all need ongoing conversion. A holy life leads to peace, joy and serenity. That is enormously attractive to others, more so than our words.

The Rule of St. Benedict has 12 degrees of humility which is a beautiful metaphor for our growth in holiness as we surrender our own will to God’s will.
 
Amazing - all three of us posted at the same time, with the same message. Think the Holy Spirit is speaking, perhaps??? 😃
 
Okay. We all evangelize ourselves, and it is a never ending life-long process. C’mon…we are to evangelize others at some point regardless of our personal journey. People are not going to be able to notice our light without a little instruction on what to look for.
 
So, how do you propose we evangelize others? By what method? How do we reach people on the street level where they are? People who have dropped out of religious life and going to Church?

Some concrete examples would be good. I think it’s easy to speak to other Catholics but we need to get out of our Churches and back to the highways and byways, and that includes inner cities and affluent suburbs. Note: I think I should point out that inner cities can be dangerous and that “veterans” of such places should be involved.

The “invisible,” to some, Catholic Church, must become become publicly visible.

Peace,
Ed
 
Okay. We all evangelize ourselves, and it is a never ending life-long process. C’mon…we are to evangelize others at some point regardless of our personal journey. People are not going to be able to notice our light without a little instruction on what to look for.
I disagree. If we are truly living our faith, the Holy Spirit will see to it that others notice. How do you think 90 out of 115 cardinals noticed Pope Francis? Did he preach to them?

Naturally, we will be called upon to give witness and instruct others – it is well known as a spiritual work of mercy to which we are committed, but we can become clanging cymbals unless we are walking the talk and have the gift of prudence and discernment before we open our mouths. 😉
 
Okay. We all evangelize ourselves, and it is a never ending life-long process. C’mon…we are to evangelize others at some point regardless of our personal journey. People are not going to be able to notice our light without a little instruction on what to look for.
How do missionaries and religious orders evangelize others? They build schools and clinics, they care for the sick, they educate children (in fact they’ll even teach the Koran to illiterate Muslims), they visit prisoners, they fight for social justice. In short they preach the Gospel by living it, which is a far more powerful statement than even the finest sermon.

But they rarely proselytize. They usually start with respect for people of other faiths. As in the film “Of Men and Gods”. Sometimes they’ll even go as far as martyrdom.
 
I disagree. If we are truly living our faith, the Holy Spirit will see to it that others notice. How do you think 90 out of 115 cardinals noticed Pope Francis? Did he preach to them?

Naturally, we will be called upon to give witness and instruct others – it is well known as a spiritual work of mercy to which we are committed, but we can become clanging cymbals unless we are walking the talk and have the gift of prudence and discernment before we open our mouths. 😉
Yah agreed. I get it. That is not the point of the thread. ;)😉
 
Good points made while I was typing…so double :)🙂 to you. That’s going to be my new thing on CAF I think. More smileys than what I’m given. It’s ecumenical.

[side topic removed]
 
We evangelize ourselves, as individuals, first.

Others are converted by witnessing one’s own ongoing conversion. Conversion is a life-long process that requires constant attention until we die.

If we think that someone elses conversion is a higher priority than our own, then we are more concerned with the speck in our neighbour’s eye than the log in our own, and the battle is lost: we will likely only turn off the person we are trying to convert. That isn’t evangelizing, it’s proselytizing.

And that applies equally to fellow Catholics whom we perceive to have a flawed view of what we perceive as “truth”.
The thing is, we all need ongoing conversion. A holy life leads to peace, joy and serenity. That is enormously attractive to others, more so than our words.

The Rule of St. Benedict has 12 degrees of humility which is a beautiful metaphor for our growth in holiness as we surrender our own will to God’s will.
Bingo!

We witness with our lives.

When the world is in a rage and people are freaking out over the crisis of the day and we go obout our business in peace, calmly attending to the little things God has placed in front of us, then people will notice and they will want to be like us. They will ask how we stay so calm, why we don’t react in anger and frustration, how we can be nice to people who curse us. Then the conversation can begin.

And it has to be a conversation. When the goal is conversion, you have lost before you started.

-Tim-
 
I’m thinking we should evangelize catholics first, to boost our numbers before evangelizing anyone else.

Also…Since there is such confusion (for some) regarding:

‘no salvation outside the church’
inability to call non-catholics ‘heretics’
‘subsists in’
true ecumenism
fraternal correction
the ‘militant’ of Church Militant
etc…

Seriously. Why would anyone want to convert? Its a tough sell if the Church is not necessary for salvation. The argument from authority, i/e Jesus told us to, only goes so far.

Discuss and please don’t read stuff into this OP. I stated things as clearly as possible with no ulterior motives.
What do you mean, Why would anyone want to convert?

Why would anyone want to be on a mountain top and feel the fresh wind in their face?

Why would anyone want to hear the truth?

Why would anyone love our Blessed Mother Mary?

Why would anyone want to receive Christ’s Precious Blood and Body?

Why would anyone want to follow in the foot steps of Christ?

Why would anyone long for the face of God?

Goodness gracious child, what are you talking about?

We are to show forth and God’s love and mercy. And we are to show forth the Beauty of His Bride the Church.

Why indeed!!!

But you are right. We must look into our hearts to understand why God’s Church is so wonderful.

We can not give what we do not have. We must love our Church before we can give this love to another.
 
We evangelize ourselves, as individuals, first.

Others are converted by witnessing one’s own ongoing conversion. Conversion is a life-long process that requires constant attention until we die.

If we think that someone elses conversion is a higher priority than our own, then we are more concerned with the speck in our neighbour’s eye than the log in our own, and the battle is lost: we will likely only turn off the person we are trying to convert. That isn’t evangelizing, it’s proselytizing.

And that applies equally to fellow Catholics whom we perceive to have a flawed view of what we perceive as “truth”.
😃 You beat me to it. That was my first thought as well - convert myself first before I can even think of converting anyone else. We can’t give what we don’t have. 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top