On absolute simple and Plotinus’s argument for God(neo platonic proof)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mickey3456987
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Mickey3456987

Guest
“ Isn’t light, gravity and possibly quark
These things doesn’t have any parts it’s not composite with anything these thing are absolute simple

These show that stage2 of Neo platonic proof is false because absolute simple can be quark itself since quark possibly doesn’t have any part

And absolute simple being can be light or gravity and not mind”

What do you think about these objection?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top