B
blase6
Guest
I came up with this thought a few days ago.
Simple existence is good. From this simple existence (God) comes forth more existing objects which are in order. But as simple objects progress to become more complex they beget disorder, which we call evil. (metaphysical evil or moral evil, or both)
This can be seen in how the death of a living creature is seen as evil. The living creature has an orderly composition of its body (cells, organs, etc.) which interacts with a simple world (a flat plain of grass is where a cow prefers to stay, for example). Say that there is also a cliff nearby. The animal is compelled somehow to be pushed off the cliff and dies. That is the result of simple objects interacting with themselves to produce a complex and disordered result.
So this can be used to explain why God allows evil to exist. God wants things to exist, so he keeps them in existence, but evil necessarily results from simple objects becoming more complex and disordered. Is this a bad understanding or would you agree that it has at least an element of truth?
Simple existence is good. From this simple existence (God) comes forth more existing objects which are in order. But as simple objects progress to become more complex they beget disorder, which we call evil. (metaphysical evil or moral evil, or both)
This can be seen in how the death of a living creature is seen as evil. The living creature has an orderly composition of its body (cells, organs, etc.) which interacts with a simple world (a flat plain of grass is where a cow prefers to stay, for example). Say that there is also a cliff nearby. The animal is compelled somehow to be pushed off the cliff and dies. That is the result of simple objects interacting with themselves to produce a complex and disordered result.
So this can be used to explain why God allows evil to exist. God wants things to exist, so he keeps them in existence, but evil necessarily results from simple objects becoming more complex and disordered. Is this a bad understanding or would you agree that it has at least an element of truth?