As a Latin, I would say that one reason I am fascinated by the Eastern Churches is that the Eastern theology offers a different perspective on the inexhaustible mysteries of the faith.
In light of that, it seems like we Latins should actively seek to understand how Eastern approaches can be expressed in our tradition, and that conversely, Eastern Catholics should actively seek to do the same. As some of the recent threads have shown, this can be difficult to do, but Christ’s will for the unity of the Church requires this of us.
I am amazed and impressed by the fact that the Vatican has developed Christological agreements with the Coptics (1988) and Assyrians (1996). This should show all of us that the theological differences between the Latin and Eastern traditions
within the Catholic communion should be entirely surmountable. Even if a solution is not immediately evident, we should be ready to trust the Holy Spirit to help us clarify the matter in time.
So as to “put my money where my mouth is”, I will attempt to do this right here, with regard to mortal vs. venial sin. In one of the other threads, one of the Eastern posters stated that he did not believe in this distinction, which triggered a lengthy and heated discussion. I do not want to reiterate that particular discussion, but I do want to show how I, as a Latin, might attempt to understand and articulate his beliefs:
–Since the early Church distinguished between the group “murder, adultery, apostasy” and lesser sins, it does seem that a distinction between mortal and venial has always been the teaching of the church
in principle. Nevertheless, since all sin is offensive to God, it is appropriate that we should confess all the sins we remember when we go to Confession, without classifying their severity. It follows that it would be only reasonable to go to communion with a “fresh” confession. Classifying severity can, after all, be a troublesome exercise. For example, although theft could be venial or mortal, depending upon the amount and circumstances, this classification may be of little help to the soul seeking salvation.–
Now, while the above paragraph does not reflect my own practice, and I do not entirely agree with the argument on a
prudential level, I can see how a Catholic could act and believe according to those ideas without deviating from the teaching of the church.
I invite any follow-ups to this post to be in the spirit of trying to discern convergences and building understanding, avoiding acrimony as much as possible.