Our Lord's overall physical presence?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bravo_6
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

Bravo_6

Guest
Was He of an impressive physique and height for His time?Correct me if I’m wrong,but I understand the average height increases every 100 or so years(not sure if there is any truth in that).In any event,someone gave me His estimate height to be 5’9".Was this height normal or abnormal for 2000 years ago?
 
Height only increases as a factor of good nutrition during youth. Likewise, average height can decrease during extended periods of poor nutrition within a population.

How Tall is the Man on the Shroud?

Isabel Piczek with expertise in figurative arts and human anatomy wrote:
I have approached the question of height from the design point of view - an image which describes a 3D object and vice-versa, including the problem of foreshortening. I have also analyzed body type, muscle structure and proportion. I determined the height to be 5’11½" to 6’1", give or take 1" for linen stretch and shrinking, both of which are possible. Because of the body type, even with shrinkage, the man cannot be under 5’11½". I lean more towards 6’0". Whether Jews in Jesus’s time were smaller or larger is not relevant here. Jews were not small to start with, judging by the finds in the 1st century cemetery excavated near the wall of the Temple in the sixties…
 
The average height of cro-magnon man was 6’. It decreased when we gave up hunting and started grain farming.

It’s interesting in Canada to see 1st generation immigrants from 3rd world countries with their kids. Mom and dad will be often be far shorter than the kids. Nutrition plays a big role.
 
yes, 2000 years ago, 5’9 would have been rather tall! the average height i believe they say was around 4’6- 4’8 so if Jesus was 5’9 He would of been out of the ordinary 😃
 
Was He of an impressive physique and height for His time?Correct me if I’m wrong,but I understand the average height increases every 100 or so years(not sure if there is any truth in that).In any event,someone gave me His estimate height to be 5’9".Was this height normal or abnormal for 2000 years ago?
A lot of people claim that the man on the Shroud is too tall (5’8" at the lowest and 6’2" at the highest, with 5’11½" being a pretty good estimate) to be a 1st century Jew.

Now while the idea that ancient folks were short may prove true in some cultures, we have to take caution not to apply this rule to everyone. For a start, we know the heights of almost no one in antiquity; the only exceptions to this was Augustus Caesar as described by Suetonius (according to him, he would be just under 5’7, and even then, Octavian was still considered “short”) and the people who perished at Pompeii and Herculaneum (according to one estimate the average height for males in Pompeii was around 167 cm (5’5.7") and females about 154 cm (5’0.6"), while the average height for Herculaneum is approximately 169 cm (5’6.5") for males and 155 cm (5’1") for females).

Greeks and Romans usually cremated their dead, so aside from the remains at Pompeii and Herculaneum we have little skeletal evidence on which to draw any meaningful conclusions concerning the average height of people at the time of Jesus. While Israelites, and later Jews, did bury their dead, few skeletons from the time have been recovered intact because of the custom of secondary burial, where the family would return a year after the corpse was first deposited inside the tomb, take all that remains of the now-decomposed body (i.e. the bones) and rebury them, either by depositing them in a pile (hence the Biblical expression “to be gathered to one’s fathers”) or - more common during Jesus’ time - on a stone box called an ossuary. Apparently the most extensive collection was from Giv’at ha-Mivtar near Jerusalem, where archeologists were able to harvest thirty-five well-preserved skeletons, eight of which are adult males. The shortest of these men is said to have measured 5’2", with the tallest being 5’11; the average height would be around 5’6.

If the eight men from Giv’at ha-Mivtar were representative of their time and place (and given that the measurements were indeed correct), then there would really be nothing unusual or abnormal about the height of the man on the Shroud, contrary to what detractors say. If we assume that the man on the Shroud is Jesus, then we can say that He may have been a little tall, but not exceptionally so.
 
Was He of an impressive physique and height for His time?Correct me if I’m wrong,but I understand the average height increases every 100 or so years(not sure if there is any truth in that).In any event,someone gave me His estimate height to be 5’9".Was this height normal or abnormal for 2000 years ago?
The Bible has no physical description of Jesus at all and the Shroud is absolutely NOT evidence of anything.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top